[1] Foster S, Tikhomirov A, Harrison J et al. Demonstration of an advanced fiber laser hydrophone array in Gulf St Vincent[C]. SPIE, 9634, 96342F(2015).

[2] Fang G S, Xu T W, Li F. 16-channel fiber laser sensing system based on phase generated carrier algorithm[J]. IEEE Photon Tech Lett, 25, 2185-2188(2013). http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6601629/

[3] Léguillon Y, Tow K H, Besnard P et al. First demonstration of a 12 DFB fiber laser array on a 100 GHz ITU grid, for underwater acoustic sensing application[C]. SPIE, 8439, 84390J(2012).

[4] Li R Z, Wang X B, Huang J B et al. Spatial-division-multiplexing addressed fiber laser hydrophone array[J]. Opt Lett, 38, 1909-1911(2013). http://europepmc.org/abstract/med/23722786

[5] Rajesh R, Sreehari C V, Vivek K et al. An eight element hydrophone array using DFB fiber laser with bender bar packaging[C]. OSA Technical Digest, Th3A, 52(2016).

[6] Tang Bo, Huang Junbin, Gu Hongcan. Distributed feedback fiber laser hydrophone used in towed line array[J]. Chinese J Lasers, 43, 0810002(2016).

[7] Tikhomirov A, Foster S. DFB FL sensor multiplexing noise[C]. Australian Conference on Optical Fiber Technology, 60-62(2006).

[8] Liu X H, Chang J, Zhang S S et al. External optical feedback effects on stability of asymmetric DFB-FL and isolation method[J]. J Mod Optic, 61, 973-979(2014). http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09500340.2014.916360

[9] Liu Wen. Research on the key issues in distributed-feedback fiber laser array[D]. Changsha: National University of Defense Technology(2016).

[10] Ma L N, Hu Y M, Xiong S D et al. Intensity noise and relaxation oscillation of a fiber laser sensor array integrated in a single fiber[J]. Opt Lett, 35, 1795-1797(2010). http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/20517419

[11] Xu T W, LI F, Wu Y F. Stability of distributed feedback fiber laser sensor array with unequal wavelength spacing[C]. SPIE, 7382, 73823P(2009).

[12] Todd M. On the probability structure of output noise from a digital phase demodulation system subject to biased intensity-based input noise[J]. J Lightwave Technol, 26, 2291-2300(2008). http://www.opticsinfobase.org/JLT/abstract.cfm?uri=JLT-26-14-2291

[13] Todd M. Noise propagation in an optical demodulation scheme used for fiber Bragg grating interrogation[C]. SPIE, 7982, 79820A(2011).

[14] Liang Xun, Xiong Shuidong, Hu Yongming. Impact of relative intensity noise on fiber optic hydrophone’s phase generated carrier scheme[J]. Chinese J Lasers, 35, 716-721(2008).

[15] Xu Dan, Lu Bin, Yang Fei et al. Narrow linewidth single-frequency laser noise measurement based on a 3×3 fiber coupler[J]. Chinese J Lasers, 43, 0102004(2016).

[16] Zeng Zhoumo, Liu Fang, Feng Hao. Digitalized demodulation based on 3×3 coupler for dual Mach-Zehnder fiber interferometer[J]. Optics and Precision Engineering, 22, 1411-1417(2014).

[17] Liu Chang. Research and realize on demodulation system based on 3×3 coupler[D]. Harbin: Harbin Engineering University(2012).

[18] Wang Dan, Liao Yanbiao, Zhang Min. Analysis of precisions of parameters calculated by ellipse fitting in double beam interferometer[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 36, 0312002(2016).

[19] Brown D A, Cameron C B, Keolian R M et al. A symmetric coupler based demodulator for fiber optic interferometric sensors[C]. SPIE, 1584, 328-335(1991).

[20] Todd M, Seaver M, Bucholtr E. Improved, operationally-passive interferometric demodulation method using 3×3 coupler[J]. Electron Lett, 38, 784-786(2002). http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?arnumber=1021841