Fig. 1. Schematic diagram of compressed sensing ghost imaging

Fig. 2. Scheme implementation process. (a) Scheme 1; (b) scheme 2

Fig. 3. Imaging comparison of three schemes

Fig. 4. Comparison of imaging effects under different grouping numbers

Fig. 5. Influence of grouping number on imaging quality

Fig. 6. Effect of loss probability on imaging results

Fig. 7. Effect of loss probability on image quality