Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, Volume. 62, Issue 18, 1817018(2025)

Comparison of Multicolor 3D Fluorescence Microscopic Imaging: Optical Sectioning Structured Illumination Microscopy Versus Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy (Invited)

Jia Qian1, Xianghua Yu1, Jiawei Guo1, Wei Jin1,2, Yang Zhang1,2, Ruiwen Yang1,2, Xing Li1, Yanlong Yang1, Dan Dan1,2、*, and Baoli Yao1,2、**
Author Affiliations
  • 1State Key Laboratory of Ultrafast Optical Science and Technology, Xi'an Institute of Optics and Precision Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xi'an 710119, Shaanxi , China
  • 2University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(10)
    Schematic diagrams of optical paths for CLSM and OS-SIM. (a) Principle of conventional single-point CLSM; (b) principle of SD-CLSM
    Principle of OS-SIM based on DMD modulation and LED illumination
    Reconstructed 3D optical sectioning images of autofluorescent mixed pollen grain samples by CLSM and OS-SIM. (a) Reconstructed image by CLSM; (b) reconstructed image by OS-SIM; enlarged images of (c) box ①, (d) box ②, (e) box ③, and (f) box ④ in Fig. 3(a); enlarged images of (g) box ①, (h) box ②, (i) box ③, and (j) box ④ in Fig. 3(b)
    Reconstructed 3D optical sectioning images of autofluorescent plant flower bud samples by CLSM and OS-SIM. (a) Reconstructed image by CLSM; (b) reconstructed image by OS-SIM; enlarged images of (c) network center structure, (d) network structure, (e) membranous structure, and (f) granular structure in Fig. 4(a); enlarged images of (g) network center structure, (h) network structure, (i) membranous structure, and (j) granular structure in Fig. 4(b)
    Measurement results of field-of-view for CLSM and OS-SIM systems. (a) Field-of-view of CLSM measured by a standard microscopic scale bar; (b) field-of-view of OS-SIM measured by a standard microscopic scale bar
    Measurement results of spatial resolution for CLSM and OS-SIM systems. (a) PSF images for CLSM and OS-SIM systems using 110 nm-diameter fluorescent beads as samples; (b) PSF curves
    Gray scale histograms of reconstructed 3D optical sectioning images for autofluorescent plant flower bud samples by CLSM and OS-SIM, N represents the number of pixels. (a) CLSM; (b) OS-SIM
    • Table 1. Comparison of key components and parameters between CLSM and OS-SIM

      View table

      Table 1. Comparison of key components and parameters between CLSM and OS-SIM

      ComponentCLSMOS-SIM
      Light sourceLaserLED
      Wavelength /nm488, 561, 637405, 460, 550, 625 (405 nm not used)
      Filter setDichroic mirrors + long-pass filters forcorresponding 3-channel lasersChroma ET-391-32/479-33/554-24/638-31 Multi LED set
      Camera specificationAndor EMCCD, resolution is 1024 pixel×1024 pixel, pixel pitch is 13.0 µm, peak quantum efficiency is 95%, average readout noise is below 1 e, full well capacity in electrons is 8×104e, grey level is 16 bit, frame rate is 26 frame/sTucsen sCMOS, resolution is 2048 pixel×2048 pixel, pixel pitch is 6.5 μm, peak quantum efficiency is 95%, average readout noise is 1.1 e, full well capacity in electrons is 4.5×104e, grey level is 16 bit, frame rate is 100 frame/s
      Objective lenNikon, 20×, NA is 0.75Novel, 20×, NA is 0.75
      Exposure time /ms5050
      Axial scanning step /nm500500
      SpecimensMixed pollen grains, flower budsMixed pollen grains, flower buds
    • Table 2. Statistical results of gray scale for regions ⓪~④ in Fig. 3

      View table

      Table 2. Statistical results of gray scale for regions ⓪~④ in Fig. 3

      SystemRegionMeanStandard deviationMaximumMinimum
      CLSM11221321978804
      1650917042425811424
      128618504273551000
      3275466384796915958
      15120802232958804
      OS-SIM1261721073
      269468854021035
      813731168600
      18087413761167
      16196502967168
    • Table 3. Comparison of key performance indexes between CLSM and OS-SIM

      View table

      Table 3. Comparison of key performance indexes between CLSM and OS-SIM

      Performance indexCLSMOS-SIM
      Field of view /µm420±10430±10
      Spatial resolution /nm581±10438±8
      Image resolution /(pixel×pixel)1024×10242048×2048
      Imaging speed /(pixel·s-11.58×105(SD-CLSM)3.76×105
      SNR /dB21.119.3
      Dynamic rangeDynamic range of CLSM is one order higher than that of OS-SIM
      Illumination power density /(W·cm-28×10416.2
      Reference price /(million RMB)1.5‒2.50.8‒1.2
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Jia Qian, Xianghua Yu, Jiawei Guo, Wei Jin, Yang Zhang, Ruiwen Yang, Xing Li, Yanlong Yang, Dan Dan, Baoli Yao. Comparison of Multicolor 3D Fluorescence Microscopic Imaging: Optical Sectioning Structured Illumination Microscopy Versus Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy (Invited)[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2025, 62(18): 1817018

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category: Medical Optics and Biotechnology

    Received: Aug. 4, 2025

    Accepted: Aug. 13, 2025

    Published Online: Sep. 11, 2025

    The Author Email: Dan Dan (dandan@opt.ac.cn), Baoli Yao (yaobl@opt.ac.cn)

    DOI:10.3788/LOP251802

    CSTR:32186.14.LOP251802

    Topics