Chinese Optics Letters, Volume. 22, Issue 12, 121101(2024)

Underwater depth imaging of a single photon lidar system based on polarization suppression

Haidong Ye1, Rui Xu1,2,3、*, Jiafeng Sun1, Hang Lü1, Yan Shi1, Yunfeng Song3, and Weiwei Liu2
Author Affiliations
  • 1College of Optical and Electronic Technology, China Jiliang University, Hangzhou 310018, China
  • 2College of Electronic Information and Optical Engineering, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China
  • 3Sunny Group Co., Ltd., Ningbo 315400, China
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(10)
    Schematic diagram of the underwater depth imaging system.
    IRF fitting plot. (a) The IRF without polarization module. (b) The IRF with a polarization module added.
    Acquired detection histogram. The attenuation length between the system and the target is 3.6. Collected data of the target to plot timing histograms under different conditions: (a) polarization module is not added to the system; (b) polarization module is added to the system.
    The depth and intensity of a flange target at 3.6 AL between the system and the target under different conditions: (a) reference images; (b) polarization module is not added to the system; (c) polarization module is added to the system.
    Photographs of the object and its dimensions used in the experiment. (a) Plastic flange, side shown by (b). (c) Depth-resolution object with nine square columns providing ten planes of different heights, shown from the side (d).
    Intensity (top row) and depth (bottom row) profiles of the flange target at 1.9, 3.6, 4.4, 6.7, 7.4, and 8.5 attenuation lengths between the system and the target. The acquisition time per pixel is 20 ms.
    Intensity (first row), depth (second row), 3D (third row), and MAE (fourth row) profiles of the flange target at 3.6 AL between the system and the target. The acquisition time per pixel was varied by software from 20 to 0.02 ms.
    Depth profiles of the deep target at 1.9, 3.1, 4.6, 5.3, 6.7, 7.2, and 8.2 attenuation lengths between the system and the target.
    • Table 1. The Average Target Returns and SBR of Each Pixel Scanned by the System without and with Polarization Modules at Different Attenuation Lengths

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 1. The Average Target Returns and SBR of Each Pixel Scanned by the System without and with Polarization Modules at Different Attenuation Lengths

      Attenuation lengthAverage optical power (mW)Polarization module not addedAdd polarization module
      Average peak return per pixelSBRAverage peak return per pixelSBR
      1.90.79825.345.86761.577.2
      3.63.57447.225.75553.868.7
      4.43.55961.916.24973.455.2
      5.63.54434.513.42954.422.4
      6.73.52933.512.12148.315.2
      7.43.52210.410.91473.512.8
    • Table 2. The Processing Time of Our Improved and Optimized Algorithm for Data at Different Acquisition Time per Pixel

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 2. The Processing Time of Our Improved and Optimized Algorithm for Data at Different Acquisition Time per Pixel

      Acquisition time per pixel20 ms2 ms0.2 ms0.02 ms
      Processing time of our improved and optimized algorithm0.1626 s0.2088 s0.1990 s0.2154 s
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Haidong Ye, Rui Xu, Jiafeng Sun, Hang Lü, Yan Shi, Yunfeng Song, Weiwei Liu, "Underwater depth imaging of a single photon lidar system based on polarization suppression," Chin. Opt. Lett. 22, 121101 (2024)

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category: Imaging Systems and Image Processing

    Received: Feb. 2, 2024

    Accepted: Jun. 13, 2024

    Published Online: Jan. 2, 2025

    The Author Email: Rui Xu (ray@cjlu.edu.cn)

    DOI:10.3788/COL202422.121101

    CSTR:32184.14.COL202422.121101

    Topics