Acta Physica Sinica, Volume. 68, Issue 20, 203101-1(2019)
Fig. 4. In-the-money option (
Fig. 5. At-the-money option (
Fig. 6. Out-of-the-money option (
Fig. 7. A comparison of the two models with maturity date of February 2019到期日为2019年2月时两模型的平值期权价格对比图
Fig. 8. A comparison of the two models with maturity date of September 2019.到期日为2019年9月时两模型的平值期权价格对比图
Fig. 9. A comparison of the two models with maturity date of June 2019到期日为2019年6月时两模型的平值期权价格对比图
Fig. 10. RMSE for the two models on the same due date.相同到期日不同执行价格下两种模型的RMSE对比图
Fig. 11. Theil inequality coefficients for the two models on the same maturity date.相同到期日不同执行价格下两种模型的Theil不等系数对比图
Parameter estimates.
参数估计结果
Parameter estimates.
参数估计结果
|
K = 25800, the evaluation index values of the two models under different maturity dates.
K = 25800下两种模型不同到期日下的评价指标值
K = 25800, the evaluation index values of the two models under different maturity dates.
K = 25800下两种模型不同到期日下的评价指标值
|
Get Citation
Copy Citation Text
Ling Feng, Wan-Ni Ji.
Received: May. 10, 2019
Accepted: --
Published Online: Sep. 17, 2020
The Author Email: