Matter and Radiation at Extremes, Volume. 6, Issue 3, 035902(2021)

Density-dependent shock Hugoniot of polycrystalline diamond at pressures relevant to ICF

Peng Wang1,2、*, Chen Zhang1, Shaoen Jiang1, Xiaoxi Duan1, Huan Zhang1, LiLing Li1, Weiming Yang1, Yonggang Liu1, Yulong Li1, Liang Sun1, Hao Liu1, and Zhebin Wang1
Author Affiliations
  • 1Laser Fusion Research Center, China Academy of Engineering Physics, Mianyang 621900, China
  • 2Department of Plasma Physics and Fusion Engineering, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(11)
    Schematic of experimental configuration with impedance-matching target: PSBO, a passive shock breakout diagnostic system.
    (a) Streaked image of shot 212 recorded by a passive shock breakout diagnostic system (PSBO); the rightmost streak is stray light. (b) Average intensities of groups indicated in (a).
    (a) Shock wave propagation in standard and sample. (b) Impedance-matching analysis. Point A (upA, PA) is the incident shock state in the standard, and point B (upB, PB) is the Hugoniot state of the sample.
    Experimental data and fitted lines: (a) shock velocity vs particle velocity; (b) pressure vs density.
    Comparisons between Hugoniot data and models: (a) shock velocity vs particle velocity; (b) pressure vs density. The results of SESAME 7830 and SESAME 7831 are shown as the blue and green lines, respectively, for initial densities of 3.23, 3.36, and 3.515 g/cm3.
    Hugoniots of materials with diffeinitial density (ρ0 = 3.515 g/cm3): (a) Hugoniots from SESAME 7830 and McQueen model in P–ρ plane; (b)–(d) Hugoniots from SESAME 7830, McQueen model, and Wu–Jing model in Us–up plane.
    Grüneisen parameter vs density. The gray and yellow regions are the valid density regions for the Grüneisen parameter of the present work (red curve) and Gregor et al.34 (black curve), respectively.
    (a) and (b) Grüneisen parameter calculated using Hugoniots of different initial density (full-density Hugoniot as reference) of SESAME 7830 and SESAME 7831; (c) and (d) Grüneisen parameter calculated along isochores of SESAME 7830 and SESAME 7831.
    • Table 1. Thicknesses of target steps used in experiments.

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 1. Thicknesses of target steps used in experiments.

      ShotAl step (μm)HDC step (μm)
      21227.79 ± 0.3531.95 ± 0.30
      21327.84 ± 0.2730.43 ± 0.24
      21427.87 ± 0.2330.78 ± 0.74
    • Table 2. Coefficients and uncertainties of piecewise-linear form of Usup relationship Us = a0 + a1(upβ) for Al.41

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 2. Coefficients and uncertainties of piecewise-linear form of Usup relationship Us = a0 + a1(upβ) for Al.41

      Range (km/s)a0±σa0(km/s)a1±σa1β (km/s)
      up ≤ 6.7639.449 ± 0.0201.324 ± 0.0163.0220
      6.763 < up ≤ 3017.992 ± 0.0781.167 ± 0.0269.8381
    • Table 3. Experimental data of present study: subscripts 1 and 2 denote Al and diamond, respectively; Δt, shock transition time in Al or diamond step; Us, measured average shock velocity; Us*, shock velocity with non-steady wave correction; up, particle velocity; P, pressure; ρ, density; Us1 and Us2* are used in impedance matching.

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 3. Experimental data of present study: subscripts 1 and 2 denote Al and diamond, respectively; Δt, shock transition time in Al or diamond step; Us, measured average shock velocity; Us*, shock velocity with non-steady wave correction; up, particle velocity; P, pressure; ρ, density; Us1 and Us2* are used in impedance matching.

      ShotΔt1 (ps)Δt2 (ps)Us1 (km/s)Us2 (km/s)Us2 (km/s)up2 (km/s)P2 (Mbar)ρ2 (g/cm3)
      212818.9 ± 5.1857.4 ± 6.733.94 ± 0.4837.26 ± 0.4537.20 ± 0.4521.36 ± 0.6325.67 ± 0.897.59 ± 0.34
      213876.2 ± 6.0879.1 ± 7.631.78 ± 0.3834.61 ± 0.4134.51 ± 0.4119.72 ± 0.5221.98 ± 0.707.54 ± 0.31
      214977.2 ± 5.4988.0 ± 14.428.53 ± 0.2831.15 ± 0.8831.02 ± 0.8817.13 ± 0.4417.16 ± 0.587.21 ± 0.41
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Peng Wang, Chen Zhang, Shaoen Jiang, Xiaoxi Duan, Huan Zhang, LiLing Li, Weiming Yang, Yonggang Liu, Yulong Li, Liang Sun, Hao Liu, Zhebin Wang. Density-dependent shock Hugoniot of polycrystalline diamond at pressures relevant to ICF[J]. Matter and Radiation at Extremes, 2021, 6(3): 035902

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category: Inertial Confinement Fusion Physics

    Received: Nov. 30, 2020

    Accepted: Feb. 14, 2021

    Published Online: May. 21, 2021

    The Author Email:

    DOI:10.1063/5.0039062

    Topics