Fig. 1. Pinhole camera model

Fig. 2. Causes of the artifacts in texture image. (a) Camera parameter errors; (b) low model accuracy; (c) inconsistent illumination environment; (d) texture aliasing

Fig. 3. Greedy algorithm diagram. (a) Triangulation texture distribution map obtained by texture quality optimal criterion; (b) triangulation texture distribution map redistributed by greedy algorithm

Fig. 4. Composite-weight schematic. From left to right: angle weight, depth weight, border weight, and composite-weight

Fig. 5. BDS function diagram. Left: source image; right: target image. s1,t1 and s2,t2 are two pairs of patches between source and target images which have minimum Euclidean distance, respectively

Fig. 6. Comparison of reconstruction results of different texture reconstruction methods

Fig. 7. Influence of illumination disagreement on the method in Ref.[73]. Each row gives the source texture image and the target texture image in the experiment, and the illumination disagreement increases gradually from top to bottom

Fig. 8. Poisson image editing diagram

Fig. 9. Seam levelling on a circumference. Function values are shown as the height above the circumference. (a) Original function; (b) levelling function; (c) sum of original function and levelling function (minus a constant)