[1] JIN Genming. Study on reaction mechanism for synthesis of superheavy element[J]. Nuclear Physics Review, 20, 71-75(2003).

[2] ZHOU Shangui. Study on superheavy nuclei and superheavy elements[J]. Nuclear Physics Review, 34, 318-331(2017).

[3] Back B B, Esbensen H, Jiang C L et al. Recent developments in heavy-ion fusion reactions[J]. Reviews of Modern Physics, 86, 317-360(2014).

[4] Jiang C L, Back B B, Rehm K E et al. Heavy-ion fusion reactions at extreme sub-barrier energies[J]. The European Physical Journal A, 57, 235(2021).

[5] Montagnoli G, Stefanini A M. Recent experimental results in sub- and near-barrier heavy-ion fusion reactions[J]. The European Physical Journal A, 53, 169(2017).

[6] Montagnoli G, Stefanini A M. Recent experimental results in sub- and near-barrier heavy-ion fusion reactions[J]. The European Physical Journal A, 59, 138(2023).

[7] Sun X X, Guo L. Effects of the tensor force on low-energy heavy-ion fusion reactions: a mini review[J]. Communications in Theoretical Physics, 74, 097302(2022).

[8] LIU Weiping. The prospects for accelerator-based nuclear physics facilities[J]. Physics, 43, 150-156(2014).

[9] MA Yugang, ZHAO Hongwei. High current heavy ion accelerator and its scientific research topic Editor's note[J]. Scientia Sinica (Physica, Mechanica & Astronomica), 50, 5(2020).

[10] Xia J W, Zhan W L, Wei B W et al. The heavy ion cooler-storage-ring project (HIRFL-CSR) at Lanzhou[J]. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, 488, 11-25(2002).

[11] Yang J C, Xia J W, Xiao G Q et al. High intensity heavy ion accelerator facility (HIAF) in China[J]. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms, 317, 263-265(2013).

[12] Zhou X H, Yang J C, HIAF Project Team. Status of the high-intensity heavy-ion accelerator facility in China[J]. AAPPS Bulletin, 32, 35(2022).

[13] Hong B. Status of the RAON project in Korea[J]. AAPPS Bulletin, 33, 3(2023).

[14] Karpov A V, Denikin A S, Naumenko M A et al. NRV web knowledge base on low-energy nuclear physics[J]. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, 859, 112-124(2017).

[15] Hagino K, Rowley N, Kruppa A T. A program for coupled-channel calculations with all order couplings for heavy-ion fusion reactions[J]. Computer Physics Communications, 123, 143-152(1999).

[16] Wen P W, Chuluunbaatar O, Gusev A A et al. Near-barrier heavy-ion fusion: role of boundary conditions in coupling of channels[J]. Physical Review C, 101, 014618(2020).

[17] Simenel C, Umar A S. Heavy-ion collisions and fission dynamics with the time-dependent Hartree–Fock theory and its extensions[J]. Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics, 103, 19-66(2018).

[18] Simenel C. Nuclear quantum many-body dynamics[J]. The European Physical Journal A, 48, 152(2012).

[19] Wang B, Wen K, Zhao W J et al. Systematics of capture and fusion dynamics in heavy-ion collisions[J]. Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables, 114, 281-370(2017).

[20] WANG Bing, WEN Kai, ZHAO Weijuan et al. Systematic study of the heavy-ion fusion dynamics at near-barrier energies[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 62, 2480-2491(2017).

[21] Wong C Y. Interaction barrier in charged-particle nuclear reactions[J]. Physical Review Letters, 31, 766-769(1973).

[22] Lwin N W, Htike N N, Hagino K. Applicability of the Wong formula for fusion cross sections from light to heavy systems[J]. Physical Review C, 95, 064601(2017).

[23] Vijay , Chahal R P, Gautam M S et al. Fusion cross sections and barrier distributions for 16O+70, 72, 73, 74, 76Ge and 18O+74Ge reactions at energies near and below the Coulomb barrier[J]. Physical Review C, 103, 024607(2021).

[24] Hill D L, Wheeler J A. Nuclear constitution and the interpretation of fission phenomena[J]. Physical Review, 89, 1102-1145(1953).

[25] Zhu L, Feng Z Q, Li C et al. Orientation effects on evaporation residue cross sections in 48Ca-induced hot fusion reactions[J]. Physical Review C, 90, 014612(2014).

[26] Chen Y, Yao H, Liu M et al. Systematic study of fusion barriers with energy dependent barrier radius[J]. Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables, 154, 101587(2023).

[27] Rafferty D C, Dasgupta M, Hinde D J et al. Multinucleon transfer in 16, 18O, 19F+208Pb reactions at energies near the fusion barrier[J]. Physical Review C, 94, 024607(2016).

[28] Gernoth K A, Clark J W, Prater J S et al. Neural network models of nuclear systematics[J]. Physics Letters B, 300, 1-7(1993).

[29] He W B, Ma Y G, Pang L G et al. High-energy nuclear physics meets machine learning[J]. Nuclear Science and Techniques, 34, 88(2023).

[30] Boehnlein A, Diefenthaler M, Sato N et al. Colloquium: Machine learning in nuclear physics[J]. Reviews of Modern Physics, 94, 031003(2022).

[31] He W B, Li Q F, Ma Y G et al. Machine learning in nuclear physics at low and intermediate energies[J]. Science China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy, 66, 282001(2023).

[32] Gao Y F, Cai B S, Yuan C X. Investigation of β-decay half-life and delayed neutron emission with uncertainty analysis[J]. Nuclear Science and Techniques, 34, 9(2023).

[33] Munoz J M, Akkoyun S, Reyes Z P et al. Predicting β-decay energy with machine learning[J]. Physical Review C, 107, 034308(2023).

[34] Ma N N, Zhao T L, Wang W X et al. Simple deep-learning approach for α-decay half-life studies[J]. Physical Review C, 107, 014310(2023).

[35] Jin Z S, Yan M S, Zhou H et al. Bayesian optimization approach to model-based description of α decay[J]. Physical Review C, 108, 014326(2023).

[36] Dong X X, An R, Lu J X et al. Nuclear charge radii in Bayesian neural networks revisited[J]. Physics Letters B, 838, 137726(2023).

[37] Dong X X, An R, Lu J X et al. Novel Bayesian neural network based approach for nuclear charge radii[J]. Physical Review C, 105, 014308(2022).

[38] Mumpower M R, Sprouse T M, Lovell A E et al. Physically interpretable machine learning for nuclear masses[J]. Physical Review C, 106, L021301(2022).

[39] Yang Z X, Fan X H, Yin P et al. Taming nucleon density distributions with deep neural network[J]. Physics Letters B, 823, 136650(2021).

[40] Shang T S, Li J, Niu Z M. Prediction of nuclear charge density distribution with feedback neural network[J]. Nuclear Science and Techniques, 33, 153(2022).

[41] Lyu B F, Li Z L, Wang Y J et al. Mapping low-lying states and B(E2;01+→21+) in even-even nuclei with machine learning[J]. Physics Letters B, 857, 139013(2024).

[42] Wang Y J, Li Q F. Machine learning transforms the inference of the nuclear equation of state[J]. Frontiers of Physics, 18, 64402(2023).

[43] Wang Y J, Li F P, Li Q F et al. Finding signatures of the nuclear symmetry energy in heavy-ion collisions with deep learning[J]. Physics Letters B, 822, 136669(2021).

[44] Dell'Aquila D, Gnoffo B, Lombardo I et al. Modeling heavy-ion fusion cross section data via a novel artificial intelligence approach[J]. Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics, 50, 015101(2023).

[45] Li Z L, Gao Z P, Liu L et al. Importance of physical information on the prediction of heavy-ion fusion cross sections with machine learning[J]. Physical Review C, 109, 024604(2024).

[46] Ke G L, Meng Q, Finley T, Guyon I, Luxburg U V, Bengio S, ed et al. Highly efficient gradient boosting decision tree[C], 30, 3149-3157(2017).

[47] Deb N K, Kalita K, Rashid H A et al. Role of neutron transfer in the sub-barrier fusion cross section in 18O+116Sn[J]. Physical Review C, 102, 034603(2020).

[48] Prajapat R, Maiti M, Kumar R et al. Fusion and back-angle quasielastic measurements in 30Si+156Gd near the Coulomb barrier[J]. Physical Review C, 105, 064612(2022).

[49] Stefanini A M, Montagnoli G, D'Andrea M et al. New insights into sub-barrier fusion of 28Si+100Mo[J]. Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics, 48, 055101(2021).

[50] Colucci G, Montagnoli G, Stefanini A M et al. Sub-barrier fusion involving odd mass nuclei: The case of 36S+50Ti,51V[J]. The European Physical Journal A, 55, 111(2019).

[51] Sanila S, Vinodkumar A M, Babu B R S et al. Fusion studies in 12C+182, 184, 186W reactions at energies below and near the Coulomb barrier[J]. Physical Review C, 106, 024614(2022).

[52] Stefanini A M, Montagnoli G, Esbensen H et al. New results in low-energy fusion of 40Ca+90, 92Zr[J]. Physical Review C, 96, 014603(2017).

[53] Del Fabbro M, Stefanini A M, Montagnoli G et al. Influence of the Z=50 shell closure on heavy-ion sub-barrier fusion[J]. The European Physical Journal A, 59, 26(2023).

[54] Navarro Pérez R, Schunck N. Controlling extrapolations of nuclear properties with feature selection[J]. Physics Letters B, 833, 137336(2022).

[55] Hagino K, Takigawa N. Subbarrier fusion reactions and many-particle quantum tunneling[J]. Progress of Theoretical Physics, 128, 1061-1106(2012).

[56] Dasso C H, Landowne S, Winther A. Channel-coupling effects in heavy-ion fusion reactions[J]. Nuclear Physics A, 405, 381-396(1983).

[57] Dasso C H, Landowne S, Winther A. A study of Q-value effects on barrier penetration[J]. Nuclear Physics A, 407, 221-232(1983).

[58] JIA Huiming, LIN Chengjian, YANG Lei et al. Study of heavy-ion reaction at energy near coulomb-barrier by backward quasi-elastic scattering[J]. Atomic Energy Science and Technology, 53, 1755-1761(2019).

[59] Thampi A. Interpretable AI: Building explainable machine learning systems[M]. Simon and Schuster(2022).

[60] Lundberg S. A unified approach to interpreting model predictions[J/OL]. arXiv preprint(2017).

[61] Emmert‐Streib F, Yli‐Harja O, Dehmer M. Explainable artificial intelligence and machine learning: A reality rooted perspective[J]. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 10, e1368(2020).

[62] Xu F, Uszkoreit H, Du Y et al. Explainable AI: A brief survey on history, research areas, approaches and challenges[C], 563-574(2019).