Acta Optica Sinica, Volume. 45, Issue 18, 1828004(2025)

Structure‑from‑Motion Method for Asteroids Based on Constrained Bundle Adjustment (Invited)

Yifan Wang1,2, Huan Xie1,2、*, Xiongfeng Yan1,2, Yaqiong Wang1,2, Jie Chen1,2, Taoze Ying1,2, Ming Yang1,2, and Xiaohua Tong1,2
Author Affiliations
  • 1College of Surveying and Geo-Informatics, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
  • 2Shanghai Key Laboratory of Space Mapping and Remote Sensing for Planetary Exploration, Shanghai 200092, China
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(13)
    Observation geometry of asteroid exploration mission
    Flowchart of proposed method
    Image examples for test datasets. (a)‒(i) Dataset 1‒9
    Comparison of camera position errors between SfM and C-SfM methods on test datasets. (a)‒(i) Dataset 1‒9
    Comparison of camera pointing errors between SfM and C-SfM methods on test datasets. (a)‒(i) Dataset 1‒9
    Comparison of camera pose estimation using SfM and C-SfM methods in test dataset 7
    Comparison of camera pose estimation using SfM and C-SfM methods in test dataset 4
    Comparison of camera pose estimation using SfM and C-SfM methods in test dataset 8
    Comparison of camera pose estimation results between SfM and C-SfM methods under attitude noise with standard deviation σ=2″
    • Table 1. Observation conditions of test dataset

      View table

      Table 1. Observation conditions of test dataset

      DatasetData typeShape modelDistance /kmSun phase angle /(°Approach angle /(°Image number
      1SimulatedBennu120159036
      2SimulatedBennu140159036
      3SimulatedBennu160159036
      4SimulatedItokawa120607536
      5SimulatedItokawa120604536
      6SimulatedItokawa120601536
      7SimulatedItokawa120607572
      8SimulatedItokawa120159054
      9In-orbitBennu~160~4.5~8736
    • Table 2. Parameter setting of simulated camera

      View table

      Table 2. Parameter setting of simulated camera

      PropertySetting
      TypePerspective camera
      Focal length628.7 mm
      Detector array size1024 pixel×1024 pixel
      Pixel size8.5 μm
      FOV0.794°×0.794°
    • Table 3. Average reprojection error, camera position estimation error, and pointing estimation error of test datasets using SfM and C-SfM methods

      View table

      Table 3. Average reprojection error, camera position estimation error, and pointing estimation error of test datasets using SfM and C-SfM methods

      Dataset

      Reprojection

      error /pixel

      Position

      error /km

      Pointing error /

      °

      SfMC-SfMSfMC-SfMSfMC-SfM
      10.1650.1590.0850.0710.0330.031
      20.1320.1270.2980.1940.1140.072
      30.1280.1240.4070.3210.1360.106
      40.1720.1620.8850.4380.4670.219
      50.1830.1550.4290.1740.2110.112
      60.1740.1720.3510.0970.2990.236
      71.1780.1731.1680.2420.5840.128
      80.1420.1360.4050.3170.1670.125
      90.1850.1730.6150.4080.1990.127
    • Table 4. Comparison of average reprojection error, camera position error, and pointing error of SfM and C-SfM methods under varying levels of random attitude noise in dataset 1

      View table

      Table 4. Comparison of average reprojection error, camera position error, and pointing error of SfM and C-SfM methods under varying levels of random attitude noise in dataset 1

      σ /(″)

      Reprojection

      error /pixel

      Position

      error /km

      Pointing

      error /(°

      SfMC-SfMSfMC-SfMSfMC-SfM
      0.50.1380.1330.1610.1130.0720.050
      10.1400.1310.1490.0970.0670.043
      20.1410.1340.4240.1640.2080.075
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Yifan Wang, Huan Xie, Xiongfeng Yan, Yaqiong Wang, Jie Chen, Taoze Ying, Ming Yang, Xiaohua Tong. Structure‑from‑Motion Method for Asteroids Based on Constrained Bundle Adjustment (Invited)[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2025, 45(18): 1828004

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category: Remote Sensing and Sensors

    Received: Jun. 3, 2025

    Accepted: Jul. 30, 2025

    Published Online: Sep. 19, 2025

    The Author Email: Huan Xie (huanxie@tongji.edu.cn)

    DOI:10.3788/AOS251213

    CSTR:32393.14.AOS251213

    Topics