Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, Volume. 60, Issue 16, 1610004(2023)
Image Threshold Segmentation Method Based on Cumulative Residual Information Energy
Figures & Tables(24)
Fig. 5. Color images of test images. (a) 368016; (b) 135069; (c) 12074; (d) 100007; (e) 238011
Fig. 6. Gray images of test images. (a) 368016; (b) 135069; (c) 12074; (d) 100007; (e) 238011
Fig. 7. Gray histograms of test images. (a) 368016; (b) 135069; (c) 12074; (d) 100007; (e) 238011
Fig. 8. Segmentation results of different methods (#368016). (a) Standard segmentation; (b) method 1; (c) method 2; (d) method 3; (e) method 4; (f) method 5; (g) method 6; (h) method 7
Fig. 9. Segmentation results of different methods (#135069). (a) Standard segmentation; (b) method 1; (c) method 2; (d) method 3; (e) method 4; (f) method 5; (g) method 6; (h) method 7
Fig. 10. Segmentation results of different methods (#12074). (a) Standard segmentation; (b) method 1; (c) method 2; (d) method 3; (e) method 4; (f) method 5; (g) method 6; (h) method 7
Fig. 11. Segmentation results of different methods (#100007). (a) Standard segmentation; (b) method 1; (c) method 2; (d) method 3; (e) method 4; (f) method 5; (g) method 6; (h) method 7
Fig. 12. Segmentation results of different methods (#238011). (a) Standard segmentation; (b) method 1; (c) method 2; (d) method 3; (e) method 4; (f) method 5; (g) method 6; (h) method 7
Fig. 13. Comparison of segmentation accuracy of test images under different methods
Fig. 14. Comparison of peak signal-to-noise ratio of test images under different methods
Fig. 17. Segmentation results of different methods (#cell1). (a) Standard segmentation; (b) method 1; (c) method 2; (d) method 3; (e) method 4; (f) method 5; (g) method 6; (h) method 7
Fig. 18. Segmentation results of different methods (#cell 2). (a) Standard segmentation; (b) method 1; (c) method 2; (d) method 3; (e) method 4; (f) method 5; (g) method 6; (h) method 7
Fig. 19. Segmentation results of different methods (#cell3). (a) Standard segmentation; (b) method 1; (c) method 2; (d) method 3; (e) method 4; (f) method 5; (g) method 6; (h) method 7
Table 1. Running time of brute force and recursive algorithm
View tableTable 1. Running time of brute force and recursive algorithm
Image number Brute force（considering symmetry） Recursive algorithm Average value 81.1418 0.1452 368016 90.9496 0.1471 135069 78.5673 0.1409 12074 78.0805 0.1407 100007 80.4477 0.1333 238011 77.6641 0.1638
Table 2. Comparison of segmentation accuracy of test images under different methods
View tableTable 2. Comparison of segmentation accuracy of test images under different methods
Image number Method 1 Method 2 Method 3 Method 4 Method 5 Method 6 Method 7 Average value 76.19 46.08 75.73 68.34 59.59 84.16 87.05 368016 40.67 22.83 36.43 71.12 27.39 87.50 89.16 135069 96.38 45.40 96.39 93.38 67.34 96.44 96.22 12074 76.67 45.27 75.54 45.85 65.98 76.44 76.90 100007 83.62 44.38 86.86 66.48 73.81 76.51 89.06 238011 83.60 72.50 83.43 64.86 63.45 83.91 83.92
Table 3. Comparison of peak signal-to-noise ratio of test images under different methods
View tableTable 3. Comparison of peak signal-to-noise ratio of test images under different methods
Image number Method 1 Method 2 Method 3 Method 4 Method 5 Method 6 Method 7 Average value 45.4723 43.8435 45.4290 44.6560 44.0715 45.6972 45.8953 368016 44.1927 43.2047 43.9098 44.1428 43.2745 45.7884 45.9916 135069 49.3790 46.3471 49.3868 48.6248 46.1141 49.4305 49.3727 12074 44.5711 42.9522 44.5033 42.9325 43.6998 44.5484 44.5544 100007 46.3390 44.1118 46.5349 45.1768 45.5190 45.7557 46.5860 238011 42.8796 42.6017 42.8101 42.4032 41.7503 42.9628 42.9716
Table 4. Comparison of segmentation accuracy of test images under different methods
View tableTable 4. Comparison of segmentation accuracy of test images under different methods
Image number Method 1 Method 2 Method 3 Method 4 Method 5 Method 6 Method 7 Average value 92.25 48.58 91.70 51.39 25.71 79.18 94.07 cell1 91.88 51.52 91.42 52.36 14.03 68.79 98.67 cell2 94.21 40.88 93.95 48.04 11.76 93.81 94.34 cell3 90.65 53.34 89.73 53.78 51.35 74.94 89.21
Table 5. Comparison of peak signal-to-noise ratio of test images under different methods
View tableTable 5. Comparison of peak signal-to-noise ratio of test images under different methods
Image number Method 1 Method 2 Method 3 Method 4 Method 5 Method 6 Method 7 Average value 40.2141 39.9135 40.1215 39.8911 38.5440 39.5497 40.2371 cell1 36.5561 36.8090 36.6380 36.8600 36.1745 36.8294 36.8690 cell2 35.7449 35.4467 35.7032 35.4740 34.7912 34.7979 35.7911 cell3 48.3414 47.4848 48.0233 47.3395 44.6664 47.0220 48.0512
Tools
Get Citation
Copy Citation Text
Jing Liu, Yue Tian, Jiulun Fan. Image Threshold Segmentation Method Based on Cumulative Residual Information Energy[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2023, 60(16): 1610004
Paper Information
Category: Image Processing
Received: Jul. 15, 2022
Accepted: Oct. 13, 2022
Published Online: Aug. 15, 2023
The Author Email: Jing Liu (liujing121777@163.com)
© Copyright 2018-2021 | Chinese Laser Press.
All Rights Reserved 沪ICP备15018463号-20