NUCLEAR TECHNIQUES, Volume. 48, Issue 1, 010603(2025)

Development of neutron diffusion and transport algorithms based on finite volume method

Wei LI1, Xiaojing LIU2,3, Xiang CHAI2,3, and Pengcheng ZHAO4、*
Author Affiliations
  • 1School of Resource Environment and Safety Engineering, University of South China, Hengyang 421001, China
  • 2School of Mechanical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
  • 3Shanghai Digital Nuclear Reactor Technology Intergration Innovation Center, Shanghai 200240, China
  • 4School of Nuclear Science and Technology, University of South China, Hengyang 421001, China
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(27)
    Implementation flowchart of neutron diffusion and transportation in OpenFOAM
    Comparison of 2D-IAEA assembly normalized powers for benchmark problems
    Comparison of 3D-IAEA assembly normalized powers for benchmark problems
    The three-dimensional power distribution of the 3D-IAEA benchmark problem
    Comparison of assembly normalized powers for 3D-LMW under steady state
    Relative power vs simulated time for 3D-LMW problem
    The three-dimensional power distribution of the 3D-LMW benchmark problem
    IAEA light water reactor benchmark geometric mode
    Fast breeder reactor geometric model
    The three-dimensional power distribution of the 3D-TAKED benchmark problem
    Core configuration for the C5 Benchmark problem
    Mesh configuration for the C5 Benchmark problem
    Power distribution
    Neutron fluxes distribution of group 1 (a) and group 7 (b)
    • Table 1. Summary of results for the benchmark problems under steady state

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 1. Summary of results for the benchmark problems under steady state

      基准问题

      Benchmark problem

      参考值

      Reference value

      模拟值

      This work

      keff误差 / 10-5

      Error

      二维IAEA(2D IAEA)1.029 5851.029 54-4.4
      三维IAEA(3D IAEA)1.029 031.028 91-11.7
      三维LMW(3D LMW)0.999 660.999 626-3.4
    • Table 2. Summary of calculation conditions for the benchmark problems under steady state

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 2. Summary of calculation conditions for the benchmark problems under steady state

      基准问题

      Benchmark problem

      网格剖分数量

      Number of

      grid divisions

      网格剖分形式

      Grid generation form

      计算条件

      Calculation conditions

      计算时间

      Computing time

      / s

      二维IAEA(2D IAEA)24 100结构化网格 Structured grid20核并行 20-core parallelism1
      三维IAEA(3D IAEA)1 144 750结构化网格 Structured grid20核并行 20-core parallelism45
      三维LMW(3D LMW)7 897 500结构化网格 Structured grid20核并行 20-core parallelism436
    • Table 3. Simulation results of 2D-IAEA for benchmark problems

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 3. Simulation results of 2D-IAEA for benchmark problems

      程序Programkeff

      二维广义横向积分方法和SANM半解析方法的综合[13]

      Synthesis of 2D generalised transverse integral methods and SANM semi-analytic methods

      1.029 490
      RBF无网格法[14] RBF meshless method1.029 312
      TriVNM[15]1.029 560 7
      OpenFOAM1.029 540
    • Table 4. Simulation results of 3D-IAEA for benchmark problems

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 4. Simulation results of 3D-IAEA for benchmark problems

      程序Programkeff
      COMSOL Multiphysics[16]1.029 090
      cosCORE[17]1.029 170
      ParaFidi[18]1.029 040
      OpenFOAM1.028 914
    • Table 5. Simulation results of 3D-LMW for benchmark problems

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 5. Simulation results of 3D-LMW for benchmark problems

      程序Programkeff
      NDEFoam[19]1.000 120
      ParaFidi[18]0.999 600

      二维广义横向积分方法和SANM

      半解析方法的综合[13]

      Synthesis of 2D generalised transverse integral methods and SANM semi-analytic methods

      0.999 719
      OpenFOAM0.999 626
    • Table 6. Summary of calculation conditions for the benchmark problems under steady state

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 6. Summary of calculation conditions for the benchmark problems under steady state

      基准问题

      Benchmark

      problem

      网格剖分数量

      Number of grid

      divisions

      网格剖分形式

      Grid generation form

      计算条件

      Calculation conditions

      计算时间

      Computing time

      / s

      C5G7123 644结构化网格Structured grid20核并行运算20-core parallelism4 835
      IAEA70 848结构化网格Structured grid20核并行运算20-core parallelism38
      TAKEDA862 665结构化网格Structured grid20核并行运算20-core parallelism9 644
    • Table 7. Comparison of local neutron flux and k-eigenvalue factors

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 7. Comparison of local neutron flux and k-eigenvalue factors

      区域ZoneSURCUDNTR本文工作This work

      区域平均

      中子注量率

      Area-average

      neutron flux

      / cm-2·s-1

      10.016 8600.016 8600.016 856
      20.000 1250.000 1250.000 124
      30.000 0410.000 0350.000 038
      40.000 2950.000 2950.000 295
      50.000 7910.000 7910.000 814
      keff1.008 31.008 51.008 5
    • Table 8. Simulation results of IAEA for benchmark problems

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 8. Simulation results of IAEA for benchmark problems

      求解程序Programkeff
      SURCU[22]1.008 3
      FELICIT[22]1.006 9
      TEPFEM[22]1.007 9
      OpenFOAM1.008 5
    • Table 9. Comparison of k-eigenvalue factors under TAKEDA

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 9. Comparison of k-eigenvalue factors under TAKEDA

      keff-全提All withdrawnkeff-插入一半Half inserted控制棒价值Control rod worth
      Monte Carlo0.973 20.959 41.47×10-2
      DNTR0.973 60.959 71.54×10-2
      PN0.979 40.964 71.56×10-2
      CTDOS[26]0.977 667 50.961 868 91.481×10-2
      TORT[26]0.976 7500.962 0071.474×10-2

      本文工作

      This work

      0.973 50.959 51.49×10-2
    • Table 10. Comparison of average neutron flux under control rod all out

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 10. Comparison of average neutron flux under control rod all out

      中子注量率

      Neutron flux density / cm-2·s-1

      Monte CarloDNTRPN

      本文工作

      This work

      燃料区

      Fuel region

      4.281 4×10-5-0.03a-1.04a0.02a
      2.408 1×10-40.03-0.640.01
      1.641 1×10-4-0.011.630.00
      6.224 7×10-6-0.250.98-0.23

      轴向增殖区

      Axial breeder zone

      5.185 0×10-60.065.100.12
      4.691 2×10-5-0.2614.5-0.32
      4.697 8×10-5-0.3122.5-0.77
      3.773 6×10-6-1.1232.7-1.98

      径向增殖区

      Radial breeder zone

      3.325 2×10-60.317.050.05
      3.089 3×10-5-0.216.84-0.48
      3.283 4×10-5-0.3722.6-0.87
      2.047 3×10-6-0.5030.8-1.16

      钠填充区

      Sodium filling zone

      2.534 4×10-50.89-0.841.27
      1.665 8×10-40.010.820.03
      1.264 8×10-40.104.260.15
      6.984 0×10-6-0.3813.4-0.14
    • Table 11. Comparison of average neutron flux under control rod half inserted

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 11. Comparison of average neutron flux under control rod half inserted

      中子注量率

      Neutron flux / cm-2·s-1

      Monte CarloDNTRPN

      本文工作

      This work

      燃料区

      Fuel region

      4.348 2×10-5-0.10a-1.74a-0.05a
      2.417 1×10-40.05-1.190.05
      1.620 0×10-40.06-3.700.05
      6.043 8×10-6-0.240.82-0.26

      轴向增殖区

      Axial breeder zone

      5.220 9×10-60.455.390.61
      4.677 2×10-5-0.2111.6-0.16
      4.619 0×10-5-0.3127.7-0.62
      3.628 7×10-6-0.2034.3-0.89

      径向增殖区

      Radial breeder zone

      3.317 6×10-60.086.25-0.16
      3.043 8×10-5-0.1313.9-0.39
      3.212 6×10-5-0.4321.8-0.95
      2.001 6×10-6-0.9129.7-1.61

      钠填充区

      Sodium filling zone

      2.590 2×10-50.24-1.950.74
      1.677 9×10-4-0.390.00-0.27
      1.255 1×10-4-0.733.27-0.64
      7.064 8×10-6-5.129.27-4.90

      控制棒

      Control rod

      1.655 6×10-50.710.21
      9.105 0×10-50.470.16
      5.181 5×10-50.310.05
      1.107 3×10-61.03-0.82
    • Table 12. Comparison of 2D-C5G7 benchmark eigenvalue solutions

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 12. Comparison of 2D-C5G7 benchmark eigenvalue solutions

      程序

      Program

      OpenFOAMMCNPRMCAPOLL02HELIOSSN2D[30]APOLLO2[31]DORT-GRS[31]TWODANT[30]
      keff1.186 491.186 551.186 431.186 181.193 2991.187 0231.186 1801.184 8181.186 677
    • Table 13. Comparison of 3D-C5G7 benchmark eigenvalue solutions

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 13. Comparison of 3D-C5G7 benchmark eigenvalue solutions

      程序

      Program

      OpenFOAMMCNPPANDAVARIANT-ISE
      keff1.143 821.143 081.142 041.145 01
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Wei LI, Xiaojing LIU, Xiang CHAI, Pengcheng ZHAO. Development of neutron diffusion and transport algorithms based on finite volume method[J]. NUCLEAR TECHNIQUES, 2025, 48(1): 010603

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category: NUCLEAR ENERGY SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING

    Received: Feb. 28, 2024

    Accepted: --

    Published Online: Feb. 26, 2025

    The Author Email: ZHAO Pengcheng (赵鹏程)

    DOI:10.11889/j.0253-3219.2025.hjs.48.240037

    Topics