Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, Volume. 55, Issue 2, 021413(2018)

Parameters of Laser Cutting Ni-Based Alloy Steel with Factors Interaction

Tianchi Yu, Yuxiang Chen*, Xin Yue, Zhijun Liang, and Jiacheng Jin
Author Affiliations
  • College of Applied Technology, University of Science and Technology Liaoning, Anshan, Liaoning 114000, China
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(15)
    The first group test macrograph
    The first group test metallography. (a) No. 1; (b) No. 2; (c) No. 3; (d) No. 4;(e) No. 5; (f) No. 6; (g) No. 7; (h) No. 8
    The second group test macrograph
    The second group test metallography. (a) No. 1; (b) No. 2; (c) No. 3; (d) No. 4; (e) No. 5; (f) No. 6;(g) No. 7; (h) No. 8; (i) No. 9; (j) No. 10; (k) No. 11; (l) No. 12; (m) No. 13; (n) No. 14; (o) No. 15; (p) No. 16
    • Table 1. 1 C match E table

      View table

      Table 1. 1 C match E table

      MatchE1, C1E2, C1E1, C2E2, C2
      R /μm311.50301.42232.48335.92
    • Table 1. 0 Visual analysis of the second orthogonal experimental interaction

      View table

      Table 1. 0 Visual analysis of the second orthogonal experimental interaction

      StatisticaverageCDC×DEC×ED×E7FC×FD×F11E×F131415
      K1612.92597.78592.28543.98647.42599.6586.62591597.24587.96595.78578.66589.74588.46600.44
      K2568.40583.54589.04637.34533.90581.72594.70590.32584.08593.36585.54602.66591.58592.86580.88
      R44.5214.243.2493.36113.5217.888.080.6813.165.4010.2424.001.844.4019.56
    • Table 1. Levels of each factor in the orthogonal test

      View table

      Table 1. Levels of each factor in the orthogonal test

      SymbolFactorLevel 1Level 2
      AGas pressure /MPa0.30.4
      BDefocusing distance /mm-0.5-1.0
      CCutting speed /(mm·min-1)200300
      DElectric current /A200210
      EPluse width /ms0.80.9
      FFrequency /Hz7580
    • Table 2. List of L8(27) interaction between two columns

      View table

      Table 2. List of L8(27) interaction between two columns

      Number1234567
      (1)(1)325476
      (2)(2)16745
      (3)(3)7654
      (4)(4)123
      (5)(5)32
      (6)(6)1
      (7)(7)
    • Table 3. Top design of the first group

      View table

      Table 3. Top design of the first group

      FactorABA×BCA×CB×CBlank
      Column1234567
    • Table 4. Top design of the second group

      View table

      Table 4. Top design of the second group

      FactorCDC×DEC×ED×EBlankFC×FD×FBlankE×FBlankBlankBlank
      Column123456789101112131415
    • Table 5. Chemical composition of GH3128 (mass fraction, %)

      View table

      Table 5. Chemical composition of GH3128 (mass fraction, %)

      NiCrWMoAlTiFeBZrCe
      Bal.19.0-22.07.5-9.07.5-9.00.4-0.80.4-0.81.00.0050.040.05
    • Table 6. Results of the first orthogonal test

      View table

      Table 6. Results of the first orthogonal test

      NumberABA×BCA×CB×CBlankAverage slagthickness /μmAverage kerfwidth /μm
      11111111434175.0
      21112222254165.0
      31221122690217.5
      41222211258137.5
      52121212466200.0
      62122121198157.5
      72211221418187.5
      82212112254172.5
    • Table 7. Results of the second orthogonal test

      View table

      Table 7. Results of the second orthogonal test

      NumberFactorSlag /μmKerf /μmPercentage /%Score
      1111111111111111323.33137.510080.08
      2111111122222222293.33162.510079.08
      3111222211112222316.67165.010077.67
      4111222222221111360.00180.010074.00
      5122112211221122406.67155.010074.17
      6122112222112211326.67155.010078.17
      7122221111222211330.00155.010078.00
      8122221122111122450.00157.510071.75
      9212121212121212273.33105.06555.79
      10212121221212121323.33125.08065.07
      11212212112122121196.67160.010084.17
      12212212121211212226.67167.510081.92
      13221122112211221223.33125.06556.12
      14221122121122112120.00115.06055.50
      15221211212212112200.00150.010085.00
      16221211221121221213.33145.010084.83
    • Table 8. Visual analysis of the first orthogonal experimental interaction

      View table

      Table 8. Visual analysis of the first orthogonal experimental interaction

      TestindexStatisticaverageInteraction factor
      ABA×BCA×CB×CBlank
      Slag thickness /μmK11636135213602008157614121308
      K2133616201612964139615601664
      R3002682521044180148356
      Kerf width /μmK1695.0697.5700.0780.0722.5685.0657.5
      K2717.5715.0712.5632.5690.0727.5755.0
      R22.517.512.5147.532.542.597.5
    • Table 9. B match C table

      View table

      Table 9. B match C table

      MatchC1, B1C2, B1C1, B2C2, B2
      R /μm375.0322.5405.0310.0
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Tianchi Yu, Yuxiang Chen, Xin Yue, Zhijun Liang, Jiacheng Jin. Parameters of Laser Cutting Ni-Based Alloy Steel with Factors Interaction[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2018, 55(2): 021413

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category: Lasers and Laser Optics

    Received: Aug. 4, 2017

    Accepted: --

    Published Online: Sep. 10, 2018

    The Author Email: Yuxiang Chen (491208485@qq.com)

    DOI:10.3788/LOP55.021413

    Topics