Hyperspectral Image Classification Based on Dual-Channel Feature Enhancement

Table 1. Implementation of spectral-channel
View table
Table 1. Implementation of spectral-channel
Layer name Kernel size Output size
Input （11×11×200）
Conv （1×1×7）（11×11×97，24）
Spectral block （1×1×7）（11×11×97，24）
BN-Mish-Conv （1×1×97）（11×11×1，24）

Table 2. Implementation of spatial-channel
View table
Table 2. Implementation of spatial-channel
Layer name Kernel size Output size
Input （11×11×200）
Conv （1×1×200）（11×11×1，24）
Spatial block （3×3×1）（11×11×1，24）

Table 3. Implementation of classification module
View table
Table 3. Implementation of classification module
Layer name Kernel size Output size
Concatenate （11×11×1，48）
Attention block （11×11×1，48）
BN-Mish-dropout-GAP （1×48）
Fully connected （1×16）

Table 4. Samples for each category of training, validation, and testing for IP dataset

View table

Table 4. Samples for each category of training, validation, and testing for IP dataset

Order	Class	Number	Training set	Verification set	Test set
Total		10249	307	307	9635
1	alfalfa	46	3	3	40
2	corn-notill	1428	42	42	1344
3	corn-mintill	830	24	24	782
4	corn	237	7	7	223
5	grass-pasture	483	14	14	455
6	grass-trees	730	21	21	688
7	grass-pasture-mowed	28	3	3	22
8	hay-windrowed	478	14	14	450
9	oats	20	3	3	14
10	soybean-notill	972	29	29	914
11	soybean-mintill	2455	73	73	2309
12	soybean-clean	593	17	17	559
13	wheat	205	6	6	193
14	woods	1265	37	37	1191
15	buildings-grass-tree-drives	386	11	11	364
16	stone-steel-towers	93	3	3	87

Table 5. Samples for each category of training, validation, and testing for UP dataset

View table

Table 5. Samples for each category of training, validation, and testing for UP dataset

Order	Class	Number	Training set	Verification set	Test set
Total		42776	210	210	42356
1	asphalt	6631	33	33	6465
2	meadows	18649	93	93	18463
3	gravel	2099	10	10	2079
4	corn	3064	15	15	3034
5	trees	1345	6	6	1333
6	bare soil	5029	25	25	4979
7	bitumen	1330	6	6	1318
8	self-blocking bricks	3682	18	18	3646
9	shadows	947	4	4	939

Table 6. Samples for each category of training, validation, and testing for SV dataset

View table

Table 6. Samples for each category of training, validation, and testing for SV dataset

Order	Class	Number	Training set	Verification set	Test set
Total		54129	263	263	53603
1	brocoli-green-weeds-1	2009	10	10	1989
2	brocoli-green-weeds-2	3726	18	18	3690
3	fallow	1976	9	9	1958
4	fallow-rough-plow	1394	6	6	1382
5	fallow-smooth	2678	13	13	2652
6	stubble	3959	19	19	3921
7	celery	3579	17	17	3545
8	grapes-untrained	11271	56	56	11159
9	soil-vinyard-develop	6203	31	31	6141
10	corn-senesced-green-weeds	3278	16	16	3246
11	lettuce-romaine-4wk	1068	5	5	1058
12	lettuce-romaine-5wk	1927	9	9	1909
13	lettuce-romaine-6wk	916	4	4	908
14	lettuce-romaine-7wk	1070	5	5	1060
15	vinyard-untrained	7268	36	36	7196
16	vinyard-vertical-trellis	1807	9	9	1789

Table 7. Samples for each category of training, validation, and testing for BS dataset

View table

Table 7. Samples for each category of training, validation, and testing for BS dataset

Order	Class	Number	Training set	Verification set	Test set
Total		3248	40	40	3168
1	water	270	3	3	264
2	hippo grass	101	2	2	97
3	floodplain grasses 1	251	3	3	245
4	floodplain grasses 2	215	3	3	209
5	reeds 1	269	3	3	263
6	riparian	269	3	3	263
7	fierscar 2	259	3	3	253
8	island interior	203	3	3	197
9	acacia woodlands	314	4	4	306
10	acacia shrublands	248	3	3	242
11	acacia grasslands	305	4	4	297
12	short mopane	181	2	2	177
13	mixed mopane	269	3	3	263
14	exposed soils	95	1	1	93

Table 8. Classification results of IP dataset of 3% training samples

View table

Table 8. Classification results of IP dataset of 3% training samples

Class	SVM	SSRN	FDSSC	DBMA	DBDA	DCFE
1 /%	24.19	67.39	97.72	61.76	87.50	100
2 /%	56.71	84.58	98.74	92.30	94.22	98.13
3 /%	65.09	92.49	97.31	97.93	98.32	94.61
4 /%	39.63	91.37	97.20	96.15	98.18	96.81
5 /%	87.33	99.04	99.53	98.00	100	97.63
6 /%	83.87	96.18	92.83	94.86	96.34	95.91
7 /%	57.20	88	100	52.94	83.33	90.90
8 /%	89.28	95.70	100	100	100	97.59
9 /%	22.58	57.14	88.88	50.00	100	100
10 /%	66.70	78.33	88.92	95.52	91.16	94.77
11 /%	62.50	95.83	99.23	95.99	97.47	96.84
12 /%	51.86	85.57	97.16	86.89	97.61	95.63
13 /%	94.79	91.86	98.90	100	97.95	100
14 /%	90.42	91.90	93.44	92.81	95.86	96.88
15 /%	62.82	90.76	95.92	90.93	93.67	96.24
16 /%	98.46	100	92.30	92.22	92.30	93.18
OA /%	69.35	90.52	96.14	93.14	96.19	96.57
AA /%	65.86	87.88	96.15	86.77	95.24	96.57
Kappa /%	64.65	89.21	95.44	92.18	95.65	96.09
Training time /s	12.23	56.06	132.43	108.67	78.96	75.41
Test time /s	1.39	3.39	5.65	7.68	6.83	7.33

Table 9. Classification results of UP dataset of 0.5% training samples

View table

Table 9. Classification results of UP dataset of 0.5% training samples

Class	SVM	SSRN	FDSSC	DBMA	DBDA	DCFE
1 /%	80.26	94.81	98.88	93.67	96.24	96.49
2 /%	86.94	98.50	98.82	96.34	99.23	99.26
3 /%	71.13	100	100	99.02	99.87	99.44
4 /%	96.44	100	91.74	97.43	98.20	98.78
5 /%	90.85	99.32	99.92	99.55	99.92	99.92
6 /%	77.02	93.43	99.61	98.67	98.06	99.97
7 /%	69.70	95.96	100	98.50	100	99.21
8 /%	67.30	75.87	84.02	82.48	84.11	91.19
9 /%	99.89	99.68	99.66	96.88	100	99.33
OA /%	83.07	94.85	97.02	95.06	97.11	98.15
AA /%	82.24	95.28	96.96	95.84	97.29	98.18
Kappa /%	77.07	93.17	96.04	93.40	96.17	97.54
Training time /s	5.32	12.06	32.16	29.83	21.88	20.12
Test time /s	2.19	5.21	13.22	13.52	11.25	12.10

Table 10. Classification results of SV dataset of 0.5% training samples

View table

Table 10. Classification results of SV dataset of 0.5% training samples

Class	SVM	SSRN	FDSSC	DBMA	DBDA	DCFE
1 /%	99.84	100	100	100	100	100
2 /%	98.95	100	97.20	100	97.84	100
3 /%	89.87	94.35	99.58	99.57	96.92	100
4 /%	97.30	95.63	96.91	90.26	97.71	94.33
5 /%	93.55	99.40	100	97.66	99.26	100
6 /%	99.79	100	99.74	100	99.97	99.77
7 /%	91.33	99.46	100	91.90	99.88	100
8 /%	74.73	89.14	95.15	95.62	96.53	97.32
9 /%	97.69	99.51	89.31	99.69	98.76	100
10 /%	90.01	97.75	98.17	97.38	97.70	99.28
11 /%	75.92	92.97	93.17	81.76	95.40	95.49
12 /%	95.19	99.63	98.35	95.93	99.79	100
13 /%	94.86	99.88	100	99.88	100	100
14 /%	89.26	98.04	95.92	97.62	96.00	97.78
15 /%	75.85	87.95	91.94	89.97	94.47	99.03
16 /%	99.03	100	100	100	100	100
OA /%	88.09	95.35	95.85	95.90	97.70	98.95
AA /%	91.45	97.11	97.21	96.08	98.14	98.93
Kappa /%	86.70	94.82	95.38	95.44	97.44	98.83
Training time /s	10.27	85.65	123.14	146.28	82.33	80.56
Test time /s	4.12	16.32	31.05	42.56	25.67	23.66

Table 11. Classification results of BS dataset of 1.2% training samples

View table

Table 11. Classification results of BS dataset of 1.2% training samples

Class	SVM	SSRN	FDSSC	DBMA	DBDA	DCFE
1 /%	100	100	83.95	96.33	95.97	93.26
2 /%	70.70	95.83	78.40	100	98.00	95.14
3 /%	84.10	100	95.57	100	100	100
4 /%	65.95	81.18	82.82	89.40	85.77	86.12
5 /%	82.62	84.55	100	99.45	98.96	92.30
6 /%	65.71	93.24	62.11	80.18	87.04	95.45
7 /%	78.77	94.75	98.82	84.33	100	96.93
8 /%	65.87	97.51	100	100	99.49	100
9 /%	75.18	81.74	100	100	91.04	100
10 /%	69.82	100	97.60	99.18	100	97.99
11 /%	95.49	100	99.00	99.32	100	100
12 /%	93.10	100	93.12	94.62	100	100
13 /%	76.25	100	100	100	100	100
14 /%	90.41	100	100	100	100	100
OA /%	78.63	94.27	90.80	94.87	96.39	96.83
AA /%	79.57	94.91	92.45	95.91	96.87	96.94
Kappa /%	76.87	93.79	90.03	94.45	96.09	96.57
Training time /s	1.65	10.25	22.35	20.88	18.65	19.39
Test time /s	0.41	2.01	2.37	3.02	2.11	2.04

Table 12. OA for different proportions of training samples in IP
View table
Table 12. OA for different proportions of training samples in IP
Algorithm 0.5% 1% 3% 5% 10%
SVM 48.53 55.95 69.35 74.74 80.55
SSRN 64.99 81.40 90.52 0.955 97.84
FDSSC 70.75 84.71 96.14 97.21 98.02
DBMA 59.33 77.64 93.14 93.75 96.91
DBDA 56.97 78.81 96.19 96.58 97.55
DCFE 74.10 86.54 96.57 97.83 98.34

Table 13. OA for different proportions of training samples in UP
View table
Table 13. OA for different proportions of training samples in UP
Algorithm 0.1% 0.5% 1% 3% 5%
SVM 70.59 83.07 88.45 90.35 93.29
SSRN 78.32 94.85 97.11 99.43 99.69
FDSSC 88.97 97.02 97.74 99.50 99.58
DBMA 89.87 95.06 96.37 99.10 99.49
DBDA 88.01 97.11 98.40 99.07 99.33
DCFE 90.79 98.15 98.66 99.99 99.99

Table 14. OA for different proportions of training samples in SV
View table
Table 14. OA for different proportions of training samples in SV
Algorithm 0.1% 0.5% 1% 3% 5%
SVM 78.65 88.09 89.89 91.24 92.47
SSRN 67.22 95.35 96.32 97.23 98.14
FDSSC 88.83 95.85 96.48 97.52 98.85
DBMA 92.15 95.90 96.66 97.62 98.21
DBDA 94.23 97.70 98.31 98.95 99.36
DCFE 95.70 98.95 99.25 99.81 99.98

Table 15. OA for different proportions of training samples in BS
View table
Table 15. OA for different proportions of training samples in BS
Algorithm 0.5% 1.2% 3% 5% 10%
SVM 73.53 78.63 87.82 89.06 92.76
SSRN 84.07 94.27 95.52 98.19 99.15
FDSSC 87.98 90.80 96.33 97.24 99.46
DBMA 93.36 94.87 95.88 98.01 99.04
DBDA 96.27 96.39 97.38 98.64 99.33
DCFE 96.66 96.83 99.24 99.62 99.80

Tools

Get Citation

Copy Citation Text

Li Zhao, Leiquan Wang, Junsan Zhang, Zhimin Shao, Jie Zhu. Hyperspectral Image Classification Based on Dual-Channel Feature Enhancement[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2023, 60(12): 1210012

Download Citation

EndNote(RIS)BibTex Plain Text

Set citation alerts for article

Save article for my favorites

Paper Information

Category: Image Processing

Received: May. 17, 2022

Accepted: Jun. 16, 2022

Published Online: Jun. 5, 2023

The Author Email: Junsan Zhang (zhangjunsan@upc.edu.cn)

DOI:10.3788/LOP221628

Topics

laser devices and laser physics

Lasers and Laser Optics

Laser physics

laser manufacturing

Instrumentation, Measurement and Metrology

Table 1. Implementation of spectral-channel

Table 1. Implementation of spectral-channel

Table 2. Implementation of spatial-channel

Table 2. Implementation of spatial-channel

Table 3. Implementation of classification module

Table 3. Implementation of classification module

Table 4. Samples for each category of training, validation, and testing for IP dataset

Table 4. Samples for each category of training, validation, and testing for IP dataset

Table 5. Samples for each category of training, validation, and testing for UP dataset

Table 5. Samples for each category of training, validation, and testing for UP dataset

Table 6. Samples for each category of training, validation, and testing for SV dataset

Table 6. Samples for each category of training, validation, and testing for SV dataset

Table 7. Samples for each category of training, validation, and testing for BS dataset

Table 7. Samples for each category of training, validation, and testing for BS dataset

Table 8. Classification results of IP dataset of 3% training samples

Table 8. Classification results of IP dataset of 3% training samples

Table 9. Classification results of UP dataset of 0.5% training samples

Table 9. Classification results of UP dataset of 0.5% training samples

Table 10. Classification results of SV dataset of 0.5% training samples

Table 10. Classification results of SV dataset of 0.5% training samples

Table 11. Classification results of BS dataset of 1.2% training samples

Table 11. Classification results of BS dataset of 1.2% training samples

Table 12. OA for different proportions of training samples in IP

Table 12. OA for different proportions of training samples in IP

Table 13. OA for different proportions of training samples in UP

Table 13. OA for different proportions of training samples in UP

Table 14. OA for different proportions of training samples in SV

Table 14. OA for different proportions of training samples in SV

Table 15. OA for different proportions of training samples in BS

Table 15. OA for different proportions of training samples in BS