Journal of the Chinese Ceramic Society, Volume. 52, Issue 11, 3617(2024)
Overview on Machine Learning Methods for Cement-Based Materials
[1] [1] CLAUDE S, GEOFFREY I W, Encyclopedia of machine learning[M]: Springer Science & Business Media, New York, US, 2011.
[2] [2] JORDAN M I, MITCHELL T M. Machine learning: Trends, perspectives, and prospects[J]. Science, 2015, 349(6245): 255–260.
[3] [3] TOM M M, Machine learning[M]: McGraw-Hill Science/Engineering/Math, New York, US, 1997.
[4] [4] KADRI E H, KENAI S, EZZIANE K, et al. Influence of metakaolin and silica fume on the heat of hydration and compressive strength development of mortar[J]. Appl Clay Sci, 2011, 53(4): 704–708.
[5] [5] LAWLER J S, ZAMPINI D, SHAH S P. Microfiber and macrofiber hybrid fiber-reinforced concrete[J]. J Mater Civ Eng, 2005, 17(5): 595–604.
[7] [7] On machine learning and the next wave of innovation[EB/OL]. (2020) [2023–12–05]. http://www.linkedin.com/pulse/machine-learning-next-wave-innovation-eric-miley-mba.
[8] [8] LIU Y, GUO B R, ZOU X X, et al. Machine learning assisted materials design and discovery for rechargeable batteries[J]. Energy Storage Mater, 2020, 31: 434–450.
[9] [9] LIU Y, ZHAO T L, JU W W, et al. Materials discovery and design using machine learning[J]. J Materiomics, 2017, 3(3): 159–177.
[10] [10] BUTLER K T, DAVIES D W, CARTWRIGHT H, et al. Machine learning for molecular and materials science[J]. Nature, 2018, 559(7715): 547–555.
[11] [11] LIU Y, ZOU X X, MA S C, et al. Feature selection method reducing correlations among features by embedding domain knowledge[J]. Acta Mater, 2022, 238: 118195.
[12] [12] LIU Y, WANG S Y, YANG Z W, et al. Auto-MatRegressor: Liberating machine learning alchemists[J]. Sci Bull, 2023, 68(12): 1259–1270.
[13] [13] AZIMI S M, BRITZ D, ENGSTLER M, et al. Advanced steel microstructural classification by deep learning methods[J]. Sci Rep, 2018, 8: 2128.
[14] [14] SAHA S K, PRADHAN S, BARAI S V. Use of machine learning based technique to X-ray microtomographic images of concrete for phase segmentation at meso-scale[J]. Constr Build Mater, 2020, 249: 118744.
[15] [15] LIU F Y, XU K, DING W Q, et al. Microstructural characteristics and their impact on mechanical properties of steel-PVA fiber reinforced concrete[J]. Cem Concr Compos, 2021, 123: 104196.
[16] [16] LORENZONI R, CUROSU I, PACIORNIK S, et al. Semantic segmentation of the micro-structure of strain-hardening cement-based composites (SHCC) by applying deep learning on micro-computed tomography scans[J]. Cem Concr Compos, 2020, 108: 103551.
[17] [17] WEI L Y, LEVOY M. Fast texture synthesis using tree-structured vector quantization[C]//Proceedings of the 27th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques. ACM, 2000: 479–488.
[20] [20] ALBERT C, ISGOR O B, ANGST U. Exploring machine learning to predict the pore solution composition of hardened cementitious systems[J]. Cem Concr Res, 2022, 162: 107001.
[21] [21] BOLSTAD W M. Introduction to Bayesian Statistics[M]. John Wiley & Sons, 2016: 428–595.
[22] [22] KE X Y, DUAN Y. A Bayesian machine learning approach for inverse prediction of high-performance concrete ingredients with targeted performance[J]. Constr Build Mater, 2021, 270: 121424.
[24] [24] ASTERIS P G, KOOPIALIPOOR M, ARMAGHANI D J, et al. Prediction of cement-based mortars compressive strength using machine learning techniques[J]. Neural Comput Appl, 2021, 33(19): 13089–13121.
[25] [25] HABEEB G A, FAYYADH M M, Rice husk ash concrete: the effect of RHA average particle size on mechanical properties and drying shrinkage[J]. Aust J Basic Appl Sci, 2009, 3(3): 1616–1622.
[26] [26] JAIN A, PATEL H, NAGALAPATTI L, et al. Overview and importance of data quality for machine learning tasks[C]//Proceedings of the 26th ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery & data mining. 2020: 3561–3562.
[27] [27] GUDIVADA V, APON A, DING J. Data quality considerations for big data and machine learning: Going beyond data cleaning and transformations[J]. Int J Adv Softw, 2017, 10(1): 1–20.
[29] [29] EBERHART R, KENNEDY J. A new optimizer using particle swarm theory[C]//MHS'95. Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on Micro Machine and Human Science. Nagoya, Japan. IEEE, 1995: 39–43.
[30] [30] KENNEDY J, EBERHART R. Particle swarm optimization[C]//Proceedings of ICNN'95 - International Conference on Neural Networks. Perth, WA, Australia. IEEE, 1995: 1942–1948.
[31] [31] STORN R, PRICE K. Differential evolution–A simple and efficient heuristic for global optimization over continuous spaces[J]. J Glob Optim, 1997, 11(4): 341–359.
[32] [32] TEODOROVIC D, DELL’ORCO M, Bee colony optimization–a cooperative learning approach to complex transportation problems[J]. Adv Or Ai, 2005, 51: 60.
[33] [33] DORIGO M, MANIEZZO V, COLORNI A. Ant system: Optimization by a colony of cooperating agents[J]. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B Cybern, 1996, 26(1): 29–41.
[34] [34] HAMIDIAN P, ALIDOUST P, GOLAFSHANI E M, et al. Introduction of a novel evolutionary neural network for evaluating the compressive strength of concretes: A case of rice husk ash concrete[J]. J Build Eng, 2022, 61: 105293.
[35] [35] GOLAFSHANI E M, BEHNOOD A, ARASHPOUR M. Predicting the compressive strength of normal and high-performance concretes using ANN and ANFIS hybridized with grey wolf optimizer[J]. Constr Build Mater, 2020, 232: 117266.
[36] [36] ASTERIS P G, SKENTOU A D, BARDHAN A, et al. Predicting concrete compressive strength using hybrid ensembling of surrogate machine learning models[J]. Cem Concr Res, 2021, 145: 106449.
[37] [37] LUNDBERG S M, NAIR B, VAVILALA M S, et al. Explainable machine-learning predictions for the prevention of hypoxaemia during surgery[J]. Nat Biomed Eng, 2018, 2(10): 749–760.
[38] [38] LAURITSEN S M, KRISTENSEN M, OLSEN M V, et al. Explainable artificial intelligence model to predict acute critical illness from electronic health records[J]. Nat Commun, 2020, 11(1): 3852.
[39] [39] LYNGDOH G A, ZAKI M, ANOOP KRISHNAN N M, et al. Prediction of concrete strengths enabled by missing data imputation and interpretable machine learning[J]. Cem Concr Compos, 2022, 128: 104414.
[40] [40] LIANG M F, GAN Y D, CHANG Z, et al. Microstructure-informed deep convolutional neural network for predicting short-term creep modulus of cement paste[J]. Cem Concr Res, 2022, 152: 106681.
[41] [41] DUAN Z H, KOU S C, POON C S. Using artificial neural networks for predicting the elastic modulus of recycled aggregate concrete[J]. Constr Build Mater, 2013, 44: 524–532.
[42] [42] LIANG M F, CHANG Z, WAN Z, et al. Interpretable Ensemble-Machine-Learning models for predicting creep behavior of concrete[J]. Cem Concr Compos, 2022, 125: 104295.
[43] [43] KHAN I, XU T F, CASTEL A, et al. Risk of early age cracking in geopolymer concrete due to restrained shrinkage[J]. Constr Build Mater, 2019, 229: 116840.
[44] [44] CASTEL A, FOSTER S J, NG T, et al. Creep and drying shrinkage of a blended slag and low calcium fly ash geopolymer concrete[J]. Mater Struct, 2016, 49(5): 1619–1628.
[45] [45] PACHECO-TORGAL F, DING Y N, JALALI S. Properties and durability of concrete containing polymeric wastes (tyre rubber and polyethylene terephthalate bottles): An overview[J]. Constr Build Mater, 2012, 30: 714–724.
[46] [46] SHEN L H, LI Q H, GE W, et al. The mechanical property and frost resistance of roller compacted concrete by mixing silica fume and limestone powder: Experimental study[J]. Constr Build Mater, 2020, 239: 117882.
[47] [47] FENG J P, ZHANG H W, GAO K, et al. Efficient creep prediction of recycled aggregate concrete via machine learning algorithms[J]. Constr Build Mater, 2022, 360: 129497.
[48] [48] TOI N, DE LA FUENTE A, MARINKOVI S. Creep of recycled aggregate concrete: Experimental database and creep prediction model according to the fib model code 2010[J]. Constr Build Mater, 2019, 195: 590–599.
[49] [49] PAUL S C, PANDA B, HUANG Y H, et al. An empirical model design for evaluation and estimation of carbonation depth in concrete[J]. Measurement, 2018, 124: 205–210.
[50] [50] KELLOUCHE Y, BOUKHATEM B, GHRICI M, et al. Exploring the major factors affecting fly-ash concrete carbonation using artificial neural network[J]. Neural Comput Appl, 2019, 31(2): 969–988.
[51] [51] CUNNINGHAM P, CARNEY J, JACOB S. Stability problems with artificial neural networks and the ensemble solution[J]. Artif Intell Med, 2000, 20(3): 217–225.
[52] [52] LIU K H, ALAM M S, ZHU J, et al. Prediction of carbonation depth for recycled aggregate concrete using ANN hybridized with swarm intelligence algorithms[J]. Constr Build Mater, 2021, 301: 124382.
[53] [53] MOGHADDAS S A, NEKOEI M, MOHAMMADI GOLAFSHANI E, et al. Modeling carbonation depth of recycled aggregate concrete using novel automatic regression technique[J]. J Clean Prod, 2022, 371: 133522.
[54] [54] STROBL C, BOULESTEIX A L, KNEIB T, et al. Conditional variable importance for random forests[J]. BMC Bioinformatics, 2008, 9: 307.
[55] [55] NUNEZ I, NEHDI M L. Machine learning prediction of carbonation depth in recycled aggregate concrete incorporating SCMs[J]. Constr Build Mater, 2021, 287: 123027.
[56] [56] BOA A R, ZTRK M, TOPU B. Using ANN and ANFIS to predict the mechanical and chloride permeability properties of concrete containing GGBFS and CNI[J]. Compos Part B Eng, 2013, 45(1): 688–696.
[57] [57] LIU Q, IQBAL M F, YANG J, et al. Prediction of chloride diffusivity in concrete using artificial neural network: Modelling and performance evaluation[J]. Constr Build Mater, 2021, 268: 121082.
[58] [58] INTHATA S, KOWTANAPANICH W, CHEERAROT R. Prediction of chloride permeability of concretes containing ground pozzolans by artificial neural networks[J]. Mater Struct, 2013, 46(10): 1707–1721.
[59] [59] SONG H W, KWON S J. Evaluation of chloride penetration in high performance concrete using neural network algorithm and micro pore structure[J]. Cem Concr Res, 2009, 39(9): 814–824.
[60] [60] VAN Q T. Machine learning approach for investigating chloride diffusion coefficient of concrete containing supplementary cementitious materials[J]. Constr Build Mater, 2022, 328: 127103.
[61] [61] ABDULALIM A A, IQBAL M, ZAHID M, et al. Prediction of rapid chloride penetration resistance of metakaolin based high strength concrete using light GBM and XGBoost models by incorporating SHAP analysis[J]. Constr Build Mater, 2022, 345: 128296.
[62] [62] LUNDBERG S M, LEE S I. A unified approach to interpreting model predictions[C]//Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. Long Beach, California, USA. ACM, 2017: 4768–4777.
[63] [63] LIU K H, ZOU C Y, ZHANG X C, et al. Innovative prediction models for the frost durability of recycled aggregate concrete using soft computing methods[J]. J Build Eng, 2021, 34: 101822.
[65] [65] Zhang J, Huang Y, Wang Y, et al. Multi-objective optimization of concrete mixture proportions using machine learning and metaheuristic algorithms[J]. Constr Build Mater, 2020, 253: 119208.
[66] [66] ZHANG J F, HUANG Y M, MA G W, et al. Mixture optimization for environmental, economical and mechanical objectives in silica fume concrete: A novel frame-work based on machine learning and a new meta-heuristic algorithm[J]. Resour Conserv Recycl, 2021, 167: 105395.
[67] [67] CEMALGIL S, GL E, ONAT O, et al. A novel prediction model for durability properties of concrete modified with steel fiber and Silica Fume by using Hybridized GRELM[J]. Constr Build Mater, 2022, 341: 127856.
[68] [68] ASTERIS P G, KOLOVOS K G, DOUVIKA M G, et al. Prediction of self-compacting concrete strength using artificial neural networks[J]. Eur J Environ Civ Eng, 2016, 20(s1): s102–s122.
[69] [69] RUTKOWSKA G, WICHOWSKI P, FRANUS M, et al. Modification of ordinary concrete using fly ash from combustion of municipal sewage sludge[J]. Materials, 2020, 13(2): 487.
[70] [70] SHEWA G A, UGWUOWO F I. A new hybrid estimator for linear regression model analysis: Computations and simulations[J]. Sci Afr, 2023, 19: e01441.
[71] [71] FAN C C, ZHENG Y X, WANG S Q, et al. Prediction of bond strength of reinforced concrete structures based on feature selection and GWO-SVR model[J]. Constr Build Mater, 2023, 400: 132602.
[72] [72] MOTLAGH S A T, NAGHIZADEHROKNI M. An extended multi-model regression approach for compressive strength prediction and optimization of a concrete mixture[J]. Constr Build Mater, 2022, 327: 126828.
[73] [73] ERDAL H I. Two-level and hybrid ensembles of decision trees for high performance concrete compressive strength prediction[J]. Eng Appl Artif Intell, 2013, 26(7): 1689–1697.
[74] [74] BELLO S A, OYEDELE L, OLAITAN O K, et al. A deep learning approach to concrete water-cement ratio prediction[J]. Results Mater, 2022, 15: 100300.
[75] [75] MIN C D, XIONG S, SHI Y, et al. Early-age compressive strength prediction of cemented phosphogypsum backfill using lab experiments and ensemble learning models[J]. Case Stud Constr Mater, 2023, 18: e02107.
[76] [76] WANG S Q, XIA P, CHEN K Y, et al. Prediction and optimization model of sustainable concrete properties using machine learning, deep learning and swarm intelligence: A review[J]. J Build Eng, 2023, 80: 108065.
[77] [77] PARUTHI S, HUSAIN A, ALAM P, et al. A review on material mix proportion and strength influence parameters of geopolymer concrete: Application of ANN model for GPC strength prediction[J]. Constr Build Mater, 2022, 356: 129253.
[78] [78] MOHTASHAM MOEIN M, SARADAR A, RAHMATI K, et al. Predictive models for concrete properties using machine learning and deep learning approaches: A review[J]. J Build Eng, 2023, 63: 105444.
[79] [79] LECUN Y, BENGIO Y, HINTON G. Deep learning[J]. Nature, 2015, 521: 436–444.
[80] [80] HEATON J. Ian Goodfellow, Yoshua Bengio, and Aaron Courville: Deep learning[J]. Genet Program Evolvable Mach, 2018, 19(1/2): 305–307.
[81] [81] EMMERT-STREIB F, YANG Z, FENG H, et al. An introductory review of deep learning for prediction models with big data[J]. Front Artif Intell, 2020, 3: 4.
[82] [82] ALZUBAIDI L, ZHANG J L, HUMAIDI A J, et al. Review of deep learning: Concepts, CNN architectures, challenges, applications, future directions[J]. J Big Data, 2021, 8(1): 53.
[83] [83] ZHOU J, CUI G Q, HU S D, et al. Graph neural networks: A review of methods and applications[J]. AI Open, 2020, 1: 57–81.
[84] [84] ISLAM S, ELMEKKI H, ELSEBAI A, et al. A comprehensive survey on applications of transformers for deep learning tasks[J]. Expert Syst Appl, 2024, 241: 122666.
[85] [85] YIN W P, KANN K, YU M, et al. Comparative study of CNN and RNN for natural language processing[EB/OL]. 2017: arXiv: 1702.01923. http://arxiv.org/abs/1702.01923.pdf
[86] [86] LIU Y, YANG Z W, YU Z Y, et al. Generative artificial intelligence and its applications in materials science: Current situation and future perspectives[J]. J Materiomics, 2023, 9(4): 798–816.
[87] [87] YU J, WENG Y W, YU J T, et al. Generative AI for performance-based design of engineered cementitious composite[J]. Compos Part B Eng, 2023, 266: 110993.
Get Citation
Copy Citation Text
ZHANG Wensheng, CAO Fuli, ZHI Xiao, YE Jiayuan, REN Xuehong. Overview on Machine Learning Methods for Cement-Based Materials[J]. Journal of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 2024, 52(11): 3617
Category:
Received: Nov. 30, 2023
Accepted: Dec. 13, 2024
Published Online: Dec. 13, 2024
The Author Email: