Chinese Journal of Lasers, Volume. 47, Issue 5, 0506002(2020)

Detection of Acoustic Wave Direction Using Weak-Reflection Fiber Bragg Gratings

Peng Ding1,2, Jing Wu3, De Kang4, Junbin Huang2、*, Wen Liu2, Hongcan Gu2, Yunyun Wang2, and Jinsong Tang1
Author Affiliations
  • 1College of Electronic Engineering, Naval University of Engineering, Wuhan, Hubei 430033, China
  • 2Department of Weapon Engineering, Naval University of Engineering, Wuhan, Hubei 430033, China
  • 3Department of Operational Research and Programming, Naval University of Engineering, Wuhan, Hubei 430033, China
  • 4Equipment Support Branch of Naval Equipment Department, Beijing 100036, China
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(10)
    Schematic of distributed sensor system based on WFBG
    Simulation signals of two sensing fibers. (a) Time domain signals; (b) amplitude-frequency curves
    Sensitivity test of sensing optical fiber
    Sensitivity test results of the sensing optical fiber. (a) Data collected by acquisition card; (b) extracted interference peak signals; (c) demodulated phase signals under multiple measurements
    Setting of distributed sensing fibers and acoustic source. (a) Sensors; (b) acoustic sources
    Signals demodulated by optical fiber sensing system. (a) Output signals of acquisition card; (b) signal peaks extracted from No.1 sensor
    Signals decumulated by the two sensors with loudspeakers at different positions. (a) Point A; (b) point B; (c) point C; (d) point D; (e) point E
    • Table 1. Sine wave fitting results of the demodulated signals

      View table

      Table 1. Sine wave fitting results of the demodulated signals

      Testing timeFitting functionR-squareFrequency /HzAmplitude /rad
      11.36sin(2.01x+1.3040)0.755123201.36
      20.72sin(2.03x+2.5830)0.727163230.72
      30.36sin(2.08x+0.8935)0.701943310.36
      41.06sin(1.85x+1.4890)0.843062941.06
      50.84sin(2.03x+2.8740)0.855733230.84
      60.92sin(1.93x+2.8485)0.748073070.92
      70.61sin(1.98x+0.79)0.775993150.61
    • Table 2. Calculation values of θ0 for loudspeakers at different locations

      View table

      Table 2. Calculation values of θ0 for loudspeakers at different locations

      PositionABCDE
      θ0 /(°)25.45313.2820-13.282-25.453
    • Table 3. Sine wave fitting results of the demodulation signals

      View table

      Table 3. Sine wave fitting results of the demodulation signals

      PointSensorFitting functionR-squareFrequency /HzΔφsignal /radθ0 /(°)
      ANo.13.087sin(1.836x+1.3040)0.8172292
      No.23.7778sin(1.916x+2.5830)0.89433051.279024.04
      BNo.13.001sin(2.248x+0.8935)0.8919357
      No.26.285sin(2.025x+1.4890)0.96843220.595510.93
      CNo.11.744sin(2.023x+2.8740)0.9021322
      No.25.951sin(1.992x+2.8485)0.9837317-0.0255-0.47
      DNo.14.027sin(2.074x+0.79)0.9817330
      No.28.726sin(2.025x+0.01625)0.9961322-0.7738-14.27
      ENo.12.123sin(2.181x+0.5101)0.9540347
      No.22.63sin(2.119x-0.8686)0.9645337-1.3787-26.04
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Peng Ding, Jing Wu, De Kang, Junbin Huang, Wen Liu, Hongcan Gu, Yunyun Wang, Jinsong Tang. Detection of Acoustic Wave Direction Using Weak-Reflection Fiber Bragg Gratings[J]. Chinese Journal of Lasers, 2020, 47(5): 0506002

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category: fiber optics and optical communications

    Received: Nov. 9, 2019

    Accepted: Jan. 10, 2020

    Published Online: May. 12, 2020

    The Author Email: Huang Junbin (tsyj98@163.com)

    DOI:10.3788/CJL202047.0506002

    Topics