Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, Volume. 61, Issue 16, 1611011(2024)

A Crosstalk Evaluation Method and Theoretical Modeling for Three-Dimensional Display (Invited)

Shujun Xing1,2、*, Zihan Nie2, Shuang Zhang2, Xunbo Yu2, Xin Gao2, Xinzhu Sang1,2、**, and Binbin Yan1,2
Author Affiliations
  • 1Shenzhen Research Institute, Beijing University of Posts & Telecommunications, Shenzhen 518057, Guangdong, China
  • 2School of Electronic Engineering, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing 100876, China
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(13)
    Schematic of the backward ray-tracing technique
    Schematic of the full parallax 3D light field reconstruction model
    Color crosstalk ratio calculation schematic
    Description of the experimental procedure
    Encoding images of the four scenes. (a) Buddha; (b) camera; (c) Mario; (d) car
    Results of simulation experiments. (a) Variation curves of viewpoint concentration and color crosstalk ratio with the horizontal movement of human eyes; (b) simulation images and index values at x=-50 mm, x=337.5 mm and x=637.5 mm
    Variation of viewpoint concentration and color crosstalk radio at different spatial spacings. (a) Viewpoint concentration; (b) color crosstalk ratio
    Variation of viewpoint concentration and color crosstalk ratio when different number of viewpoints are selected. (a) Viewpoint concentration; (b) color crosstalk ratio
    Viewpoint images of four scenes at ±30°, ±15°, and 0°
    Variation of viewpoint concentration and color crosstalk ratio during horizontal movement of human eyes at four scenes. (a) Viewpoint concentration; (b) color crosstalk ratio
    • Table 1. 3D scene data and display parameters

      View table

      Table 1. 3D scene data and display parameters

      3D sceneNumber of verticesNumber of edgesNumber of facesNumber of triangles
      Buddha8219243551623516236
      Camera447005888146441160882336
      Mario133833267458133725267450
      Car3787238750674837196497439298
      Display panelResolution7680×4320
      Size /(mm×mm)1440×810
      Light control unitNumber of covered pixels10×10,20×20,40×40,60×60
      Virtual camera arrayArray size10×10,20×20,40×40,60×60
      Neighboring distance /mm192.45,123.72,91.16,44.41,29.36
      Horizontal field of view /(°)51.28
      Distance between the virtual camera array and the display panel /mm1500
    • Table 2. A 5-point rating scale

      View table

      Table 2. A 5-point rating scale

      ScoreImage quality
      5High image quality without crosstalk
      4Some crosstalk is observed but it does not affect the image quality too much
      3Crosstalk can be clearly seen and has an impact on image quality
      2Higher crosstalk,affecting the viewing experience
      1Crosstalk is very high and seriously interferes the viewing experience
    • Table 3. Correlation coefficients between four metrics and subjective ratings

      View table

      Table 3. Correlation coefficients between four metrics and subjective ratings

      MetricSpearman’s coefficientPearson’s coefficient
      PSNR0.6322906567880.597100003203
      SSIM0.0946830212320.111147887930
      Viewpoint concentration0.89089205915310.901234453597
      Color crosstalk ratio0.88123441383290.938139950959
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Shujun Xing, Zihan Nie, Shuang Zhang, Xunbo Yu, Xin Gao, Xinzhu Sang, Binbin Yan. A Crosstalk Evaluation Method and Theoretical Modeling for Three-Dimensional Display (Invited)[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2024, 61(16): 1611011

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category: Imaging Systems

    Received: May. 24, 2024

    Accepted: Jun. 27, 2024

    Published Online: Aug. 12, 2024

    The Author Email: Shujun Xing (xsj@bupt.edu.cn), Xinzhu Sang (xzsang@126.com)

    DOI:10.3788/LOP241365

    CSTR:32186.14.LOP241365

    Topics