Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, Volume. 51, Issue 4, 41101(2014)
Comparison of Pseudo-Thermal Light Source Based on Different Method of Modulation
[1] [1] Klyshko D N. Photon and Nonlinear Optics [M]. NewYork: Gordon and Breach Science, 1988. 312-332.
[2] [2] Strekalov D V, Sergienko A V, Klyshko D N, et al.. Observation of two-photon“ghost”interference and diffraction [J]. Phys Rev Lett, 1995, 74(18): 3600-3603.
[3] [3] Bennink R S, Benley S J, Boyd R W.“Two-photon”coincidence imaging with a classical source [J]. Phys Rev Lett, 2002, 89(11): 113601.
[4] [4] Valencia A, Scarcelli G, D′ Angelo M, et al.. Two-photon imaging with thermal light [J]. Phys Rev Lett, 2005, 94(6): 063601.
[5] [5] Jeffrey H Shapiro. Computational ghost imaging [J]. Phys Rev A, 2008, 78(6): 061802.
[6] [6] Qin Jiexin, Liu Shichao, Huang Genghua, et al.. Research on the pseudo-thermal light made by liquid crystal spatial light modulation [J]. Chinese J Lasers, 2012, 39(1): 0102008.
[7] [7] Qi Kangnan, Qin Kecheng, Cheng Lu. In troduction to Statistical Optics [M] . Tianjin: Nankai University Press, 1987. 69-82, 205-211, 410-424.
[8] [8] Xuefeng Liu, Mingfei Li, Xuri Yao. High-visibility ghost imaging from artificially generated non-Gaussian intensity fluctuations [J]. AIP Advances, 2013, 3(5): 052121.
Get Citation
Copy Citation Text
Fan Xiaolei, Zhang Erfeng, Xu Yaokun, Xiong Shuidong. Comparison of Pseudo-Thermal Light Source Based on Different Method of Modulation[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2014, 51(4): 41101
Category: Imaging Systems
Received: Nov. 6, 2013
Accepted: --
Published Online: Apr. 8, 2014
The Author Email: Fan Xiaolei (878079909@qq.com)