Journal of Applied Optics, Volume. 46, Issue 3, 695(2025)

Lightweight infrared image super-resolution reconstruction based on gradient guidance

Kun ZHU, Liangji SHEN*, Wentao JIANG, Chaojie YE, Zhonghao LI, Wei WEI, and Jilong LIU
Author Affiliations
  • Xi'an Institute of Applied Optics, Xi'an 710065, China
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(12)
    Structure diagram of infrared image super-resolution reconstruction network
    Part of images from dataset 2
    Comparison of results for different super-resolution methods under scenario 1 (with scale factor of 2)
    Comparison of results for different super-resolution methods under scenario 2 (with scale factor of 4)
    Comparison of results for different super-resolution methods under scenario 3 (with scale factor of 2)
    Comparison of results for different super-resolution methods under scenario 4 (with scale factor of 4)
    Comparison of results for different super-resolution methods under scenario 5 (with scale factor of 2)
    Comparison of results for different super-resolution methods under scenario 6 (with scale factor of 4)
    Comparison of M1 model and M2 results under the same scenario
    • Table 1. Results of comparative experiment (dataset 1)

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 1. Results of comparative experiment (dataset 1)

      MethodScalePSNRSSIMParams/KFLOPs/G
      SRCNN×230.230.824357.317.57
      FSRCNN34.620.873412.82.02
      IMDN35.000.8948694.452.95
      MSID34.100.8648375.527.34
      BSRN35.560.9096331.624.02
      Omni-SR35.650.9082771.757.48
      SAFMN37.190.9373226.717.16
      YUAN38.960.962781.16.25
      SHI39.460.9675255.121.83
      Ours39.760.9699111.48.54
      SRCNN×429.730.708657.317.57
      FSRCNN31.100.733612.81.55
      IMDN33.070.7937715.213.64
      MSID31.730.6834393.67.18
      BSRN33.160.8086352.46.40
      Omni-SR33.260.8043792.514.77
      SAFMN33.420.7864238.44.51
      YUAN35.620.897481.16.25
      SHI35.900.9047255.130.92
      Ours35.910.9051111.38.54
    • Table 2. Results of comparative experiment (dataset 2)

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 2. Results of comparative experiment (dataset 2)

      MethodsScalePSNRSSIMParams/KFLOPs/G
      BSRN×233.650.7640331.624.02
      SAFMN34.610.8301226.717.16
      YUAN35.180.856281.16.25
      SHI35.570.8725255.121.83
      Ours35.450.8726111.48.54
      BSRN×433.950.7675352.46.40
      SAFMN32.990.7182238.44.51
      YUAN33.960.771481.16.25
      SHI34.030.7813255.130.92
      Ours34.050.7762111.38.54
    • Table 3. Comparison of objective evaluation metrics for various models

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 3. Comparison of objective evaluation metrics for various models

      MethodsScaleGMGRBαPSNRSSIM
      M1×250.0136.770.9325
      M250.0139.130.9655
      M350.138.720.9619
      M450.00139.040.9637
      M5100.0139.310.9665
      M6150.0139.760.9699
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Kun ZHU, Liangji SHEN, Wentao JIANG, Chaojie YE, Zhonghao LI, Wei WEI, Jilong LIU. Lightweight infrared image super-resolution reconstruction based on gradient guidance[J]. Journal of Applied Optics, 2025, 46(3): 695

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category: NIGHT VISION TECHNOLOGY

    Received: Nov. 1, 2024

    Accepted: --

    Published Online: May. 28, 2025

    The Author Email: Liangji SHEN (沈良吉)

    DOI:10.5768/JAO202546.0304002

    Topics