Acta Optica Sinica, Volume. 45, Issue 6, 0628007(2025)

Terrestrial Ecosystem Carbon Monitoring Satellite Laser Elevation Control Point Extraction and Accuracy Verification

Guoyuan Li1,2、*, Jinquan Guo1,2、**, Jie Chen1,3, Jiyi Chen1, Zhao Liu1, Mingyuan Peng1, and Xiaoping Pang2
Author Affiliations
  • 1Land Satellite Remote Sensing Application Center, Ministry of Natural Resources, Beijing 100048, China
  • 2Chinese Antarctic Center of Surveying and Mapping, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, Hubei , China
  • 3College of Geoscience and Surveying Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology-Beijing, Beijing 100083, China
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(21)
    Pulse width of transmit waveform. (a) Fixed gain; (b) variable gain
    Background noise of transmit waveform. (a) Fixed gain; (b) variable gain
    SNR of transmit waveform. (a) Fixed gain; (b) variable gain
    Background noise of echo waveform. (a) Fixed gain; (b) variable gain
    SNR of echo waveform. (a) Fixed gain; (b) variable gain
    Experimental process of laser elevation control point extraction and verification
    Schematic diagram of saturated waveform
    Low SNR echo waveform
    Schematic diagrams of laser error distribution of Shenyang area. (a) All laser altimetry data; (b) laser elevation control points
    Schematic diagrams of laser error distribution of PA area. (a) All laser altimetry data; (b) laser elevation control points
    Laser data affected by thick clouds. (a) Multi-spectral image; (b) footprint image; (c) waveform data
    Saturation laser altimetry data of building area. (a) Multi-spectral image; (b) footprint image; (c) waveform data
    Saturation laser altimetry data of water area. (a) Multi-spectral image; (b) footprint image; (c) waveform data
    Error distributions of laser elevation control points with different ECP flags in Shenyang area. (a) ECP flag is 1; (b) ECP flag is 2; (c) ECP flag is 3
    Error distributions of laser elevation control points with different ECP flags in PA area. (a) ECP flag is 1; (b) ECP flag is 2; (c) ECP flag is 3
    • Table 1. Statistics of pulse width of echo waveform in Chagan Lake area

      View table

      Table 1. Statistics of pulse width of echo waveform in Chagan Lake area

      LaserNumber of laser pointFixed gain pulse width /nsVariable gain pulse width /ns
      MeanStandard deviationMeanStandard deviation
      Laser 18011.1630.06111.0660.094
      Laser 27110.4410.04310.5050.110
      Laser 37810.8990.12011.0670.206
      Laser 45510.3560.11010.4970.104
      Laser 52511.0010.08211.1740.110
    • Table 2. Statistics of differences in pulse width of echo waveform and transmit waveform in Chagan Lake area

      View table

      Table 2. Statistics of differences in pulse width of echo waveform and transmit waveform in Chagan Lake area

      LaserNumber of laser pointFixed gain pulse width difference /nsVariable gain pulse width difference /ns
      MeanStandard deviationMeanStandard deviation
      Laser 1801.5720.1331.6900.155
      Laser 2711.2130.1350.7950.143
      Laser 3780.2960.0940.3160.210
      Laser 4550.9560.1000.5930.177
      Laser 5251.0870.1351.1990.208
    • Table 3. Elevation accuracy verification results of Shenyang

      View table

      Table 3. Elevation accuracy verification results of Shenyang

      ItemRMSE /mMean error /mNumberQualification rate /%
      All laser points2.4100.0991324
      Laser elevation control points0.440-0.00777886.76
      ECP flag is 10.291-0.12954984.51
      ECP flag is 20.328-0.07911793.16
      ECP flag is 30.8580.22411291.96
    • Table 4. Elevation accuracy verification results of PA

      View table

      Table 4. Elevation accuracy verification results of PA

      ItemRMSE /mMean error /mNumberQualification rate /%
      All laser points4.1300.94523713
      Laser elevation control points0.607-0.086600583.70
      ECP flag is 10.289-0.097119081.51
      ECP flag is 20.461-0.136157780.78
      ECP flag is 30.739-0.058323885.88
    • Table 5. Analysis of the influence of screening parameters

      View table

      Table 5. Analysis of the influence of screening parameters

      Screening conditionShenyang regionPA region
      Deletion numberDeletion rate /%Deletion numberDeletion rate /%
      DEM elevation difference292.144051.71
      Saturation24918.411170.05
      SNR785.76287712.13
      Number of peak46434.291576066.46
    • Table 6. Comparison of DSM accuracy with and without laser elevation control points

      View table

      Table 6. Comparison of DSM accuracy with and without laser elevation control points

      TypeNumber of ECPNumber of check pointMean error /mRMSE /m
      Without ECP03996510.9111.45
      With ECP280399652.622.27
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Guoyuan Li, Jinquan Guo, Jie Chen, Jiyi Chen, Zhao Liu, Mingyuan Peng, Xiaoping Pang. Terrestrial Ecosystem Carbon Monitoring Satellite Laser Elevation Control Point Extraction and Accuracy Verification[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2025, 45(6): 0628007

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category: Remote Sensing and Sensors

    Received: Jul. 13, 2024

    Accepted: Sep. 30, 2024

    Published Online: Mar. 24, 2025

    The Author Email: Guoyuan Li (ligy@lasac.cn), Jinquan Guo (guojinquan0516@foxmail.com)

    DOI:10.3788/AOS241293

    CSTR:32393.14.AOS241293

    Topics