Road-Change Detection in High-Resolution Imagery Incorporating Swin Transformer Structure

Xueting Jia; Weidong Song; Shangyu Sun

doi:10.3788/LOP242122

Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, Volume. 62, Issue 10, 1028006(2025)

Road-Change Detection in High-Resolution Imagery Incorporating Swin Transformer Structure

Xueting Jia^1,2, Weidong Song^1,2, and Shangyu Sun^1,2、*

¹School of Geomatics, Mapping and Geoscience, Liaoning University of Engineering and Technology, Fuxin 123000, Liaoning , China

²Collaborative Innovation Research Institute of Geospatial Information Service, Liaoning University of Engineering and Technology, Fuxin 123000, Liaoning , China

show less

Abstract Get PDF(in Chinese)

Figures & Tables(11)

Fig. 1. STSNet structure

Download full size

Fig. 2. Overall structure of Swin Transformer network

Download full size

Fig. 3. Gradient-aware multi-scale feature fusion module

Download full size

Fig. 4. Scale-aware strip attention module

Download full size

Fig. 5. Examples of LNTU_RCD_GF dataset. (a1)(a2) Previous period images; (b1)(b2) images from the later period; (c1)(c2) CRCD; (d1) (d2) LNTU_RCD_GF

Download full size

Fig. 6. Examples of change detection visualization results for different models on the LNTU_RCD_GF dataset. (a) Previous period images; (b) images from the later period; (c) label; (d) UNet; (e) PSPNet; (f) FPN; (g) UNet++; (h) MANet; (i) STSNet

Download full size

Fig. 7. Examples of change detection visualization results for different models on the WRCD dataset. (a) Previous period images; (b) images from the later period; (c) label; (d) UNet; (e) PSPNet; (f) FPN; (g) UNet++; (h) MANet; (i) STSNet

Download full size

Fig. 8. Examples of ablation experiment visualization results. (a) Previous period images; (b) images from the later period; (c) label; (d) baseline network; (e) GAMF²; (f) SSAM; (g) STSNet

Download full size

Table 1. Comparison of prediction results of different network models on LNTU_RCD_GF dataset
View table
Table 1. Comparison of prediction results of different network models on LNTU_RCD_GF dataset
Method F₁ /% α_IoU /% P /% R /%
UNet 86.10 80.11 88.05 86.93
PSPNet 79.62 71.15 84.12 79.68
FPN 83.99 77.54 87.40 83.98
UNet++ 85.76 80.33 86.15 87.29
MANet 88.82 81.99 94.01 86.39
STSNet 89.31 84.28 89.71 90.49

Table 2. Comparison of prediction results of different network models on WRCD dataset
View table
Table 2. Comparison of prediction results of different network models on WRCD dataset
Method F₁ /% α_IoU /% P /% R /%
UNet 86.88 78.86 86.42 90.13
PSPNet 77.13 67.24 84.04 76.49
FPN 85.81 76.98 87.55 85.84
UNet++ 88.69 81.76 90.70 88.06
MANet 84.68 75.89 87.45 83.80
STSNet 90.42 83.72 91.39 90.86

Table 3. Comparison of ablation experiment results
View table
Table 3. Comparison of ablation experiment results
GAMF² SSAM F₁ /% α_IoU /% P /% R /%
× × 86.57 81.43 87.19 87.55
√ × 88.16 82.83 89.59 88.94
× √ 87.25 81.94 89.07 87.83
√ √ 89.31 84.28 89.71 90.49

Tools

Get Citation

Copy Citation Text

Xueting Jia, Weidong Song, Shangyu Sun. Road-Change Detection in High-Resolution Imagery Incorporating Swin Transformer Structure[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2025, 62(10): 1028006

Download Citation

EndNote(RIS)BibTex Plain Text

Set citation alerts for article

Save article for my favorites

Paper Information

Category: Remote Sensing and Sensors

Received: Oct. 15, 2024

Accepted: Dec. 2, 2024

Published Online: Apr. 27, 2025

The Author Email: Shangyu Sun (shangyu_sun@126.com)

DOI:10.3788/LOP242122

CSTR:32186.14.LOP242122

Topics

laser devices and laser physics

Lasers and Laser Optics

Laser physics

laser manufacturing

Instrumentation, Measurement and Metrology

Table 1. Comparison of prediction results of different network models on LNTU_RCD_GF dataset

Table 1. Comparison of prediction results of different network models on LNTU_RCD_GF dataset

Table 2. Comparison of prediction results of different network models on WRCD dataset

Table 2. Comparison of prediction results of different network models on WRCD dataset

Table 3. Comparison of ablation experiment results

Table 3. Comparison of ablation experiment results