Research on retrieval method of atmospheric ozone column concentration from ultraviolet channel sunlight meter

QIAN Congcong; XUN Lina; LU Hui; LYU Dingyong; ZHANG Jingjing; LI Xin

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1673-6141.2025.01.005

Journal of Atmospheric and Environmental Optics, Volume. 20, Issue 1, 60(2025)

Research on retrieval method of atmospheric ozone column concentration from ultraviolet channel sunlight meter

QIAN Congcong1,*... XUN Lina1,2, LU Hui1, LYU Dingyong1, ZHANG Jingjing1,2 and LI Xin3 |Show fewer author(s)

Author Affiliations

¹School of Electrical Engineering and Automation, Anhui University, Hefei 230601, China

²School of Artificial Intelligence, Anhui University, Hefei 230601, China

³Anhui Institute of Optics and Fine Mechanics, HFIPS, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei 230031, China

show less

Abstract Get PDF(in Chinese)

Figures & Tables(10)

Table 1. Dobson、Brewer and UV-PFR instrument band

View table

View in Article

Table 1. Dobson、Brewer and UV-PFR instrument band

差值类型	波长对/nm
差值类型	Dobson	Brewer	UV-PFR
单差对	305/317	310/313	305/311
	305/325	316/320	318/332
	305/340	310/316	305/318
	317/325	310/320	305/332
	317/340	313/316	311/318
	325/340	313/320	311/332
双差对	305/317, 317/340	310/313, 313/320	305/311, 311/318
双差对	317/340, 325/340	313/320, 316/320	311/332, 318/332

Table 2. Comparison of results between Dobson single difference method and Pandora

View table

View in Article

Table 2. Comparison of results between Dobson single difference method and Pandora

单差对/nm	$Ω_{A} - Ω_{B}$
单差对/nm	绝对平均值/DU	绝对偏差/DU	相对平均值/DU	相对偏差/%
305/317	-17.7	59.6	-5.7	19
305/325	-5.2	13.3	-1.6	4.3
305/340	-2.9	4.6	-0.9	1.5
317/325	-0.6	5.6	-0.1	1.8
317/340	-1.0	4.0	-0.3	1.3
325/340	-1.3	3.1	-0.4	1.0

Table 3. Comparison of results of Dobson double difference method and Pandora
View table
View in Article
Table 3. Comparison of results of Dobson double difference method and Pandora
双差对/nm $Ω_{A} - Ω_{B}$
绝对平均值/DU 绝对偏差/DU 相对平均值/DU 相对偏差/%
305/317, 317/340 -1.3 5.6 -0.4 1.9
317/340, 325/340 -4.5 14.6 -1.4 4.7

Table 4. Comparison of the results of Brewer single difference method and Pandora

View table

View in Article

Table 4. Comparison of the results of Brewer single difference method and Pandora

单差对/nm	$Ω_{A} - Ω_{B}$
单差对/nm	绝对平均值/DU	绝对偏差/DU	相对平均值/DU	相对偏差/%
310/313	-7.4	25.0	-2.3	8.0
316/320	-2.1	6.9	-0.7	2.2
310/316	-3.2	9.7	-1.0	3.1
310/320	-2.7	7.1	-0.9	2.3
313/316	-2.8	15.2	0.2	4.9
313/320	-1.0	5.1	-0.3	1.6

Table 5. Comparison of the results of Brewer double difference method and Pandora
View table
View in Article
Table 5. Comparison of the results of Brewer double difference method and Pandora
双差对/nm $Ω_{A} - Ω_{B}$
绝对平均值/DU 绝对偏差/DU 相对平均值/DU 相对偏差/%
310/313, 313/320 -1.3 3.7 -0.4 1.2
313/320, 316/320 -1.5 4.9 -0.5 1.6

Table 6. Comparison of results between UV-PFR single difference method and Pandora instrument

View table

View in Article

Table 6. Comparison of results between UV-PFR single difference method and Pandora instrument

单差对/nm	$Ω_{A} - Ω_{B}$
单差对/nm	绝对平均值/DU	绝对偏差/DU	相对平均值/DU	相对偏差/%
305/311	-5.8	18.9	-1.8	6.1
318/332	-1.3	2.8	-0.4	0.1
305/318	-5.6	13.8	-1.8	4.4
305/332	-3.1	5.0	-0.9	1.6
311/318	-5.5	14.5	-1.7	4.6
311/332	-2.8	4.6	-0.8	1.5

Table 7. Comparison of results between UV-PFR double difference method and Pandora instrument
View table
View in Article
Table 7. Comparison of results between UV-PFR double difference method and Pandora instrument
双差对/nm $Ω_{A} - Ω_{B}$
绝对平均值/DU 绝对偏差/DU 相对平均值/DU 相对偏差/%
305/311, 311/318 0.7 7.2 0.2 2.4
311/332, 318/332 -1.1 1.8 -0.3 0.5

Table 8. Comparison of the best channels of the three single-difference pairs
View table
View in Article
Table 8. Comparison of the best channels of the three single-difference pairs
单差对/nm $Ω_{A} - Ω_{B}$
绝对平均值/DU 绝对偏差/DU 相对平均值/DU 相对偏差/%
325/340 -1.3 3.1 -0.4 1.0
313/320 -1.0 5.1 -0.3 1.6
318/332 -1.3 2.8 -0.4 0.1

Table 9. Comparison of the best channels of the three single-difference pairs
View table
View in Article
Table 9. Comparison of the best channels of the three single-difference pairs
双差对/nm $Ω_{A} - Ω_{B}$
绝对平均值/DU 绝对偏差/DU 相对平均值/DU 相对偏差/%
305/317, 317/340 -1.3 5.6 -0.4 1.9
310/313, 313/320 -1.3 3.7 -0.4 1.2
311/332, 318/332 -1.1 1.8 -0.3 0.5

Table 10. Five groups of experimental results in different time periods

View table

View in Article

Table 10. Five groups of experimental results in different time periods

实验数量	$Ω_{B}$ /DU	$Ω_{A} - Ω_{B}$
实验数量	$Ω_{B}$ /DU	绝对平均值/DU	绝对偏差/DU	相对平均值/DU	相对偏差/%
679	296	-0.48	3.36	-0.2	1.0
679	296	-0.84	2.72	-0.3	0.9
276	336	-0.27	2.76	-0.08	0.8
276	336	-0.22	3.88	-0.06	1.0
299	331	-1.29	3.29	-0.4	0.9
299	331	-1.19	2.27	-0.3	0.7
597	314	-0.2	2.48	-0.6	0.8
597	314	-0.4	4.91	-0.1	1.0
312	366	-0.59	2.18	-0.2	0.6
312	366	-0.75	1.75	-0.2	0.5

Tools

Get Citation

Copy Citation Text

Congcong QIAN, Lina XUN, Hui LU, Dingyong LYU, Jingjing ZHANG, Xin LI. Research on retrieval method of atmospheric ozone column concentration from ultraviolet channel sunlight meter[J]. Journal of Atmospheric and Environmental Optics, 2025, 20(1): 60

Download Citation

EndNote(RIS)BibTex Plain Text

Set citation alerts for article

Save article for my favorites

Paper Information

Category:

Received: Nov. 19, 2021

Accepted: --

Published Online: Feb. 21, 2025

The Author Email: Congcong QIAN (z19201009@stu.ahu.edu.cn)

DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1673-6141.2025.01.005

Topics

laser devices and laser physics

Lasers and Laser Optics

Laser physics

laser manufacturing

Instrumentation, Measurement and Metrology

Table 1. Dobson、Brewer and UV-PFR instrument band

Table 1. Dobson、Brewer and UV-PFR instrument band

Table 2. Comparison of results between Dobson single difference method and Pandora

Table 2. Comparison of results between Dobson single difference method and Pandora

Table 3. Comparison of results of Dobson double difference method and Pandora

Table 3. Comparison of results of Dobson double difference method and Pandora

Table 4. Comparison of the results of Brewer single difference method and Pandora

Table 4. Comparison of the results of Brewer single difference method and Pandora

Table 5. Comparison of the results of Brewer double difference method and Pandora

Table 5. Comparison of the results of Brewer double difference method and Pandora

Table 6. Comparison of results between UV-PFR single difference method and Pandora instrument

Table 6. Comparison of results between UV-PFR single difference method and Pandora instrument

Table 7. Comparison of results between UV-PFR double difference method and Pandora instrument

Table 7. Comparison of results between UV-PFR double difference method and Pandora instrument

Table 8. Comparison of the best channels of the three single-difference pairs

Table 8. Comparison of the best channels of the three single-difference pairs

Table 9. Comparison of the best channels of the three single-difference pairs

Table 9. Comparison of the best channels of the three single-difference pairs

Table 10. Five groups of experimental results in different time periods

Table 10. Five groups of experimental results in different time periods

微信扫一扫：分享