Fig. 1. Angular distribution Wrel(θ) for fixed I=1018  W cm−2 and η=0.35 versus the scattering angle θ.

Fig. 2. Relativistic angular distribution Wrel(θ) for the fixed scattering angle θ=0.22 and the parabolic coordinate η=0.35 versus the laser field intensity I.

Fig. 3. Relativistic angular distribution Log Wrel(θ) versus the ellipticity, ε, for the fixed scattering angle θ=0.22, the parabolic coordinate η=0.35, and the laser field intensity I=1018  W cm−2.

Fig. 4. (a) Maximal scattering angle θmax versus laser field intensity I; (b) maximal scattering angle θmax versus the ellipticity, E, for the fixed laser field intensity I=1018  W cm−2.

Fig. 5. Relativistic energy distribution Wrel(E) for the fixed parabolic coordinate η=10.

Fig. 6. Comparative review; nonrelativistic versus relativistic results of the angular [Wrel(θ) vs Wnonrel(θ)] and the energy distribution spectra [Wrel(E) vs Wnonrel(E)], with all included corrections for the fixed parabolic coordinates η=50 and 100, respectively.