Acta Optica Sinica, Volume. 44, Issue 12, 1201013(2024)

Impact Analysis of Multi-Baseline Transmission Photoelectric Measurement on Atmospheric Extinction Coefficient

Hanhui Cao1,2,3, Hongyao Chen2,3、*, Liming Zhang2,3, and Jiawei Li2,3
Author Affiliations
  • 1University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, Anhui , China
  • 2Hefei Institutes of Physical Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei 230031, Anhui , China
  • 3Key Laboratory of Optical Calibration and Characterization, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei 230031, Anhui , China
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(21)
    Schematic diagram of variable baseline measurement
    Schematic diagram of optical path for multi-baseline extinction coefficient measurement system
    Overall block diagram of detection circuit
    Design schematic diagram of detection analog circuit
    Minimum output signal allowed for each movement distance and normalized response of signals in various radiation bands. (a) Minimum output signal; (b) normalized response
    Analysis results of noise characteristics of detection circuit. (a) Lower limit of feedback capacitance value; (b) variation of circuit SNR with feedback resistance when output voltage range is 0.1-5.0 V
    Variation of extinction coefficient measured in each band with baseline distance when output voltage is 0.001 V
    Measurement of background noise and time-domain statistical characteristics in detection circuit. (a) Measurement of background noise; (b) time-domain statistical characteristics
    Experimental results of three methods for noise resistance. (a) Relation between relative error and SNR; (b) when SNR is 30 dB, relative standard deviation varies with sampling time; (c) when SNR is 0, relative standard deviation varies with sampling time; (d) when SNR is -30 dB, relative standard deviation varies with sampling time
    Variation of correlation coefficient of signals at both ends with time difference under various SNR
    Variation of transmittance measurement values with time difference
    Variation of relative standard deviation of transmittance measurement with time difference. (a) Calculation results of three digital signal processing methods; (b) when time difference is 20 ms, calculation result of spectrum peak search method
    Experimental results of measurement uncertainty in extinction coefficient (confidence factor k is 2). (a) Influence of stability of fixed-point transmittance measurement on extinction coefficient; (b) influence of the number of measurement points at receiving unit on extinction coefficient
    Variation of measurement uncertainty in extinction coefficient with maximum baseline distance
    Variation of background radiation signals at both ends
    Changes in transmittance, environmental temperature and relative humidity over time based on dual baseline operation
    • Table 1. Main component parameters of the system

      View table

      Table 1. Main component parameters of the system

      Main componentParameterValue
      Halogen lampStability /%0.1
      FilterCenter wavelength /nm440, 550, 670, 870, 1020
      CondenserDiameter /mm25.4
      Focal length /mm100
      Projection lensDiameter /mm50.8
      Focal length /mm500
      Receiving lensDiameter /mm101.6
      Focal length /mm500
      Photoelectric detection circuitSpectral response range /nm190-1100
      Detector modelS2281
      Photosensitive area /mm2100
      Output voltage /V0-5
    • Table 2. Comparison of three methods for resisting random noise interference at different time differences

      View table

      Table 2. Comparison of three methods for resisting random noise interference at different time differences

      SNR /dBRelative standard deviation ofleast square /%Relative standard deviation ofspectrum peak search /%Relative standard deviation of sampling integral technique /%
      0100 μs200 μs0100 μs200 μs0100 μs200 μs
      -4013.9923913.7458813.4517219.6033116.9938717.0648615.8014515.1449514.98034
      -357.989777.714847.772378.461208.278588.143788.872398.505158.51167
      -304.513484.488354.690994.837514.747225.012285.072334.924925.27868
      -252.466232.382802.580762.710052.539482.640142.823422.670932.71224
      -201.382471.431521.423851.473461.552631.513421.498111.578271.55441
      -150.789890.806100.754810.825600.846130.789210.868920.908990.81423
      -100.452510.420870.444170.485780.453170.476580.505420.475920.49392
      -50.251670.254250.261990.274330.275840.279270.283440.289630.28759
      00.144590.140660.139980.155860.149460.149640.161240.153920.15217
      50.075140.079730.082280.079450.085460.088310.082370.087390.09151
      100.045250.043290.044250.048370.046830.045830.049070.048150.04783
      150.025180.025790.024060.027220.027260.026150.027660.027880.02714
      200.014880.014700.015170.016080.015330.015890.016800.015960.01602
      250.008030.008790.008590.008610.009150.008700.008920.009460.00902
      300.005230.005450.005890.005480.005460.005400.005660.005610.00561
      350.003600.003970.004340.003730.003830.003730.003770.003840.00386
      400.002830.003260.003970.002850.003010.003110.002870.003040.00321
      450.002640.002950.003620.002620.002650.002660.002600.002660.00267
      500.002530.002890.003560.002490.002560.002600.002500.002550.00261
      550.002520.002850.003540.002490.002510.002580.002490.002500.00257
      600.002500.002840.003530.002470.002490.002550.002470.002480.00255
    • Table 3. Standard deviation of transmittance with different SNR

      View table

      Table 3. Standard deviation of transmittance with different SNR

      SNR /dBOutput current /ATransmittanceStandard deviation of transmittance
      Spectrum peak searchSampling integral technique
      -401.074×10-128.448×10-61.436×10-61.279×10-6
      -351.910×10-121.502×10-51.244×10-61.278×10-6
      -303.396×10-122.671×10-51.268×10-61.316×10-6
      -256.039×10-124.751×10-51.206×10-61.269×10-6
      -201.074×10-118.448×10-51.312×10-61.333×10-6
      -151.910×10-111.502×10-41.271×10-61.366×10-6
      -103.396×10-112.671×10-41.211×10-61.271×10-6
      -56.039×10-114.751×10-41.310×10-61.376×10-6
      01.074×10-108.448×10-41.263×10-61.300×10-6
      51.910×10-101.502×10-31.284×10-61.313×10-6
      103.396×10-102.671×10-31.251×10-61.286×10-6
      156.039×10-104.751×10-31.295×10-61.324×10-6
      201.074×10-98.448×10-31.295×10-61.348×10-6
      251.910×10-91.502×10-21.374×10-61.421×10-6
      303.396×10-92.672×10-21.459×10-61.499×10-6
      356.040×10-94.752×10-21.818×10-61.825×10-6
      401.074×10-88.451×10-22.543×10-62.571×10-6
      451.911×10-81.503×10-13.984×10-63.992×10-6
      503.400×10-82.675×10-16.849×10-66.821×10-6
      556.052×10-84.761×10-11.197×10-51.192×10-5
      601.078×10-78.479×10-12.109×10-52.103×10-5
    • Table 4. Standard deviation of transmittance at various modulation frequencies under dark background

      View table

      Table 4. Standard deviation of transmittance at various modulation frequencies under dark background

      Modulation frequency /HzGroup 1Group 2Group 3Group 4Group 5Group 6Group 7Group 8Mean value
      18.7503.0134.1682.1192.4682.1863.0612.1562.2492.678
      25.9774.6774.6831.5082.8893.5721.8782.3902.6593.032
      32.8314.4104.2771.2832.1761.9792.7812.8152.5132.779
      39.8432.4143.4042.8132.5592.4221.9391.9974.1372.711
      46.1134.6904.4131.9032.8332.5852.5652.0941.8732.869
      53.1082.6482.8831.9331.9633.3192.2542.6701.7052.422
      59.3373.2173.0542.2632.2822.3542.5134.5653.0992.918
      65.3012.8783.0232.0032.5653.2543.5144.4443.9233.200
      70.9563.9823.7872.3392.8433.5182.6662.8672.3883.049
      77.3463.3563.7182.9211.9111.6311.5642.3692.2752.468
    • Table 5. Standard deviation of transmittance at various modulation frequencies under natural light background

      View table

      Table 5. Standard deviation of transmittance at various modulation frequencies under natural light background

      Modulation frequency /HzGroup 1Group 2Group 3Group 4Group 5Group 6Group 7Group 8Mean value
      18.75016.6778.9337.7094.73014.3036.07612.8857.2969.826
      25.97612.8168.1088.1285.9477.2806.7557.1125.8117.745
      32.8319.7509.9624.2089.6614.7398.5269.42510.6708.368
      39.84311.6615.90610.4175.01112.6338.3586.1896.6018.347
      46.1137.3606.8425.4436.5258.2544.7124.8434.7646.093
      53.1078.5717.3289.3578.3574.88412.78919.53210.13310.119
      59.3379.7039.8892.90412.1024.6844.9945.5807.3627.152
      65.3018.6394.4248.2033.9536.06311.23013.0298.1507.961
      70.95712.1895.6088.6558.4719.0196.4246.73910.6588.470
      77.3476.8079.3057.4319.83416.1505.72414.4459.1949.861
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Hanhui Cao, Hongyao Chen, Liming Zhang, Jiawei Li. Impact Analysis of Multi-Baseline Transmission Photoelectric Measurement on Atmospheric Extinction Coefficient[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2024, 44(12): 1201013

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category: Atmospheric Optics and Oceanic Optics

    Received: Feb. 8, 2024

    Accepted: Apr. 12, 2024

    Published Online: Jun. 7, 2024

    The Author Email: Chen Hongyao (hychen@aiofm.ac.cn)

    DOI:10.3788/AOS240630

    Topics