Residents’ Perception of the Recreational Value of Forest Parks: A Case Study in Shanghai, China

Location type	Forest park	Park area (ha)	Year opened	Questionnaire number	Number of valid respondents
Suburban	Gongqing National Forest Park	131	2005	100	87
Suburban	Gucun Country Forest Park	350	2011	100	95
Suburban	Pujiang Country Forest Park	582	2017	190	174
Rural	Sheshan National Forest Park	401	1993	120	95
Rural	Haiwan National Forest Park	433	2004	140	113
Rural	Dongping National Forest Park	355	1993	100	94

Table 2.
Categories of forest park recreational value

View table

View in Article

Table 2.
Categories of forest park recreational value

Category	Classification	Description
Psychological	Enjoying nature	A place where residents can be close to nature and perceive the scenery
Psychological	Artistic creation	A site to create artistic works, such as photographs or paintings
Psychological	Acquiring knowledge	A place for residents to acquire scientific knowledge
Physical	Physical exercise	A field in which to conduct physical exercise
Physical	Exploration activity	A place where residents can engage in exploratory activities
Social	Social interaction	An occasion for social interaction
Social	Family interaction	A site to hold a family gathering

Table 3.
Sample distribution by gender, age, education, and income (658 respondents)

View table

View in Article

Table 3.
Sample distribution by gender, age, education, and income (658 respondents)

Social variables	Category	Suburbs	Rural areas	Total number
Gender	male	155	154	309
Gender	female	201	148	349
Age	<18	29	9	38
	18-44	208	242	450
	45-59	69	39	108
	60-74	42	11	53
	>75	8	1	9
Education	Primary or below	4	5	9
	Middle school	44	19	63
	High school or vocational school	97	86	183
	Junior college or college	195	172	367
	Postgraduate	16	20	36
Income	<1500 yuan month^-1	52	21	73
	1500-3000 yuan month^-1	48	44	92
	3000-5000 yuan month^-1	114	111	225
	5000-10000 yuan month^-1	98	87	185
	>10000 yuan month^-1	44	39	83

Table 4.
Mean values of the three dimensions of recreational value in the suburbs and rural area forest parks assigned by residents

View table

View in Article

Table 4.
Mean values of the three dimensions of recreational value in the suburbs and rural area forest parks assigned by residents

Category	Classification		Total	Suburbs	Rural areas	χ²	P-value
Psychological value	Enjoying nature	Mean	4.30	4.35	4.25	18.479^#	<0.001^***
	Enjoying nature	Std.Dev.	0.80	0.85	0.73	18.479^#	<0.001^***
	Artistic creation	Mean	3.67	3.60	3.76	6.771	0.149
	Artistic creation	Std.Dev.	0.95	0.98	0.90	6.771	0.149
	Acquiring knowledge	Mean	3.18	3.31	3.03	26.431^#	<0.001^***
	Acquiring knowledge	Std.Dev.	1.04	0.98	1.09	26.431^#	<0.001^***
	Average		3.72	3.75	3.68	20.448^#	0.040^*
Physical value	Physical exercise	Mean	3.56	3.49	3.65	5.694	0.223
	Physical exercise	Std.Dev.	0.92	0.94	0.88	5.694	0.223
	Exploration activity	Mean	3.32	3.48	3.13	29.341^#	<0.001^***
	Exploration activity	Std.Dev.	1.03	0.94	1.09	29.341^#	<0.001^***
	Average		3.44	3.49	3.39	13.727	0.089
Social value	Social interaction	Mean	3.24	3.16	3.32	8.259	0.083
	Social interaction	Std.Dev.	0.98	0.99	0.97	8.259	0.083
	Family interaction	Mean	3.45	3.33	3.59	13.606^#	0.009^**
	Family interaction	Std.Dev.	0.96	1.00	0.90	13.606^#	0.009^**
	Average		3.34	3.25	3.46	32.264^#	<0.001^***

Tools

Get Citation

Copy Citation Text

Kaixuan ZHANG, Xiaoling WANG, Jiaying SHI, Xijin ZHANG, Qichong ZHU. Residents’ Perception of the Recreational Value of Forest Parks: A Case Study in Shanghai, China[J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2020, 11(4): 425

Download Citation

EndNote(RIS)BibTex Plain Text

Set citation alerts for article

Save article for my favorites

Paper Information

Received: Feb. 29, 2020

Accepted: Apr. 13, 2020

Published Online: Oct. 17, 2020

The Author Email: ZHANG Kaixuan (zhangkx99@126.com)

DOI:10.5814/j.issn.1674-764x.2020.04.011

Topics

Resource Economy

Research Articles

Table 1. Forest parks selected in the suburbs and rural areas of Shanghai

Table 1. Forest parks selected in the suburbs and rural areas of Shanghai

Table 2. Categories of forest park recreational value

Table 2. Categories of forest park recreational value

Table 3. Sample distribution by gender, age, education, and income (658 respondents)

Table 3. Sample distribution by gender, age, education, and income (658 respondents)

Table 4. Mean values of the three dimensions of recreational value in the suburbs and rural area forest parks assigned by residents

Table 4. Mean values of the three dimensions of recreational value in the suburbs and rural area forest parks assigned by residents

Table 1.
Forest parks selected in the suburbs and rural areas of Shanghai

Table 1.
Forest parks selected in the suburbs and rural areas of Shanghai

Table 2.
Categories of forest park recreational value

Table 2.
Categories of forest park recreational value

Table 3.
Sample distribution by gender, age, education, and income (658 respondents)

Table 3.
Sample distribution by gender, age, education, and income (658 respondents)

Table 4.
Mean values of the three dimensions of recreational value in the suburbs and rural area forest parks assigned by residents

Table 4.
Mean values of the three dimensions of recreational value in the suburbs and rural area forest parks assigned by residents