Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, Volume. 55, Issue 4, 041010(2018)

Hyperspectral Image Classification Method Based on Adaptive Manifold Filtering

Jianshang Liao1、*, Liguo Wang1, and Siyuan Hao1
Author Affiliations
  • 1 College of Information and Communication Engineering, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin, Heilongjiang 150001, China
  • 1 School of Communication and Electronic Engineering, Qingdao University of Technology, Qingdao, Shandong 266520, China
  • 1 School of Rail Transit, Guangdong Communication Polytechnic, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510650, China
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(11)
    Original spectrum and filtering results of Indian Pines data sets. (a) 10th band; (b) 80th band; (c) 120th band; (d) 180th band
    Optimization for manifold filtering coefficient of Indian Pines data sets. (a) Spatial deviation coefficient σs; (b) range deviation coefficient σr
    Flow of AMF-SVM
    Classification of Indian Pines data sets. (a) Ground truth; (b) SVM, OA is 80.93%; (c) SVM-PCA, OA is 80.46%; (d) GBF-SVM, OA is 82.82%; (e) BF-SVM, OA is 88.99%; (f) GDF-SVM, OA is 91.08%; (g) EPF-B-g, OA is 92.99%; (h) EPF-G-g, OA is 92.83%; (i) IFRF, OA is 93.64%; (j) AMF-SVM, OA is 95.16%
    Classification for Pavia University. (a) Ground truth;(b) SVM, OA is 84.80%; (c) SVM-PCA, OA is 83.95%; (d) GBF-SVM, OA is 85.20%; (e) BF-SVM, OA is 89.03%; (f) GDF-SVM, OA is 94.20%; (g) EPF-B-g, OA is 91.29%; (h) EPF-G-g, OA is 91.68%; (i) IFRF, OA is 95.31%; (j) AMF-SVM, OA is 97.92%
    Charts of OA and Kappa coefficient with different training samples. (a) Indian Pines; (b) Pavia University
    OA and Kappa coefficient for different classification methods. (a) 1% training sample for Indian Pins; (b) 0.1% training sample for Pavia University
    Optimization for hyperspectral classification of adaptive manifold filtering. (a) Indian Pins; (b) Pavia University
    • Table 1. Classification data statistics of Indian Pines data sets

      View table

      Table 1. Classification data statistics of Indian Pines data sets

      GroundtruthSumsampleNo.TrainsampleNo. /%TestsampleNo. /%SVM /%SVM-PCA /%GBF-SVM /%BF-SVM /%GDF-SVM /%EPF-B-g /%EPF-G-g /%IFRF /%AMF-SVM /%
      Alfalfa5479383.5778.8988.8391.8691.1095.5894.7891.3492.24
      Corn-no till143479371.5071.0876.4684.2887.2591.5791.3991.2396.95
      Corn-min till83479370.6372.0270.3888.9391.6787.3487.5484.6497.90
      Corn23479344.1941.4851.6157.9866.2162.5761.3986.2287.16
      Grass/pasture49779389.9089.1288.9692.2993.6095.4894.8293.9693.58
      Grass/trees74779394.7994.6395.1596.7996.8699.7999.5098.1097.40
      Grass/pasture-mowed2679353.9153.2766.5062.4564.3154.1962.8088.1376.67
      Hay-windrowed48979397.1696.1899.5698.3397.47100.0100.099.5899.16
      Oats2079346.9947.5275.9457.4662.4222.6939.3489.4794.07
      Soybeans-no till96879369.2968.2867.8983.0584.4187.5986.2187.1492.83
      Soybeans-min till246879385.1284.4386.8891.7093.6897.7197.5195.9698.51
      Soybeans-clean till61479379.4078.4174.9087.7190.0395.6795.8895.2496.58
      Wheat21279395.9896.5397.0097.3897.5899.9599.6099.3498.38
      Woods129479397.6797.9798.1998.0898.5999.9499.8198.8499.01
      Bldg-Grass-Tree38079345.9443.5968.5164.4274.8660.1661.2691.1678.77
      Stone-steeltowers9579376.4276.1671.1676.4281.8293.3597.7383.3782.04
      OA /%---80.9380.4682.8288.9991.0892.9992.8393.6296.16
      Kappa---78.1277.5880.2887.4189.8191.9691.7892.1195.62
    • Table 2. Classification statistics of Pavia University data sets

      View table

      Table 2. Classification statistics of Pavia University data sets

      GroundtruthSumTrain /%Test /%SVM /%SVM-PCA /%GBF-SVM /%BF-SVM /%GDF-SVM /%EPF-B-g /%EPF-G-g /%IFRF /%AMF-SVM /%
      Asphalt664129887.8486.1988.7488.2394.9898.0797.4997.7098.68
      Meadows1864929895.8195.9996.1397.0398.3299.9899.9199.3499.79
      Gravel209929857.8748.7654.5165.0176.0772.6069.3986.6890.63
      Trees306429888.1785.0189.2191.9896.1991.8492.2692.7896.56
      Metalsheets134529898.3498.7298.8497.5498.3899.8599.9499.0299.40
      Soil502929854.3354.9656.2177.9188.3460.7460.3299.8697.59
      Bitumen133029864.6464.7965.8970.5082.8981.2786.3896.3795.12
      Bricks368229878.9779.4177.8880.1891.4398.4795.9573.1397.05
      Shadows94729889.3384.2990.6487.8293.3795.1393.2083.1094.49
      OA /%---84.8083.9685.2089.0394.2092.3291.9295.3198.17
      Kappa---79.4778.3180.0085.3492.2989.5789.0493.6797.57
    • Table 3. Hyperspectral classification data statistics of adaptive manifold filtering

      View table

      Table 3. Hyperspectral classification data statistics of adaptive manifold filtering

      Indexn012345678
      Tree height2345678910
      Tree node371531631272555111023
      Indian PinesOA /%95.6195.6795.9795.6195.8096.1596.0496.1696.13
      Kappa94.9895.0595.3994.9995.2095.6195.4795.6295.58
      PaviaOA /%98.0298.1998.1498.2098.0898.1798.4098.2998.17
      Kappa97.3797.6097.5397.6297.4597.5897.8897.7397.57
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Jianshang Liao, Liguo Wang, Siyuan Hao. Hyperspectral Image Classification Method Based on Adaptive Manifold Filtering[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2018, 55(4): 041010

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category: Image processing

    Received: Sep. 15, 2017

    Accepted: --

    Published Online: Sep. 11, 2018

    The Author Email: Jianshang Liao (liaojianshang@126.com)

    DOI:10.3788/LOP55.041010

    Topics