Chinese Journal of Lasers, Volume. 49, Issue 9, 0906002(2022)

Design and Simulation Analysis of Laguerre Gaussian Mode Demultiplexing Hybrid Based on Multi-Plane Light Conversion

Daifang Guo1, Peng Zhang1,2,3、*, Xiyu Gong1, Yunlong Fan1, and Shoufeng Tong1,3
Author Affiliations
  • 1School of Optoelectronic Engineering, Changchun University of Technology, Changchun 130022, Jilin, China
  • 2School of Electronic Information Engineering, Changchun University of Technology, Changchun 130022, Jilin, China
  • 3National and Local Joint Engineering Centre of Space Optoelectronic Technology, Changchun University of Technology, Changchun 130022, Jilin, China
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(28)
    Schematic of multiplane light conversion
    Flow chart of wavefront matching algorithm[13]
    Schematic of mode demultiplexing mixing input-output port of sinusoidal LG mode
    Intensity distribution diagrams of mode demultiplexing hybrid. (a) Intensity distribution after passing through the first phase plate; (b) intensity distribution after passing through the second phase plate; (c) intensity distribution after passing through the third phase plate; (d) intensity distribution after passing through the fourth phase plate
    Phase mask. (a) Phase mask of the first phase plate; (b) phase mask of the second phase plate; (c) phase mask of the third phase plate; (d) phase mask of the fourth phase plate
    Light intensity distributions at the input end of signal light and local oscillator light. (a) Light intensity distribution of LG10; (b) light intensity distribution of LG20; (c) light intensity distribution of LO
    Light intensity distributions at the output end of signal light and local oscillator light. (a) Light intensity distribution of LG10 output terminal; (b) light intensity distribution of LG20 output terminal; (c) light intensity distribution of LO output terminal
    Amplitude distributions of light spots at the output end of signal light and local oscillator light. (a) Amplitude distributions of light spots at the output end of LG10 and LO (first column); (b) amplitude distributions of light spots at the output end of LG20 and LO (second column)
    Phase distributions of light spots at the output end of signal light and local oscillator light. (a) Phase distribution of light spots at the output end of LG10 and LO (first column); (b) phase distribution of light spots at the output end of LG20 and LO (second column)
    Coupling matrix of normalized ideal field and output field
    Relationship curve between insertion loss (IL) or mode dependent loss (MDL) and the number of phase plates. (a) Relationship curve between IL and the number of phase plates; (b) relationship curve between MDL and the number of phase plates
    Variations of coupling coefficient, ΔLi, IL, MDL with wavelength. (a) Relationship curve between coupling coefficient and wavelength; (b) relationship curve between ΔLi and wavelength; (c) relationship curve between IL and wavelength; (d) relationship curve between MDL and wavelength
    Variation of coupling coefficient, ΔLi, IL, and MDL with pixel size. (a) Relationship curves between coupling coefficient and pixel size; (b) relationship curves between ΔLi and pixel size; (c) relationship curve between IL and pixel size; (d) relationship curve between MDL and pixel size
    Schematic of mode demultiplexing mixing input-output port of OAM mode
    Intensity distributions of mode demultiplexing hybrid. (a) Light intensity distribution after passing through the first phase plate; (b) light intensity distribution after passing through the second phase plate; (c) light intensity distribution after passing through the third phase plate; (d) light intensity distribution after passing through the fourth phase plate
    Phase mask diagrams. (a) Phase mask of the first phase plate; (b) phase mask of the second phase plate; (c) phase mask of the third phase plate; (d) phase mask of the fourth phase plate
    Light intensity distributions of signal light and local oscillator light input terminals. (a) Light intensity distribution of OAM1; (b) light intensity distribution of OAM2; (c) light intensity distribution of LO
    Light intensity distributions of signal light and local oscillator light output terminals. (a) Light intensity distributions of OAM1 output terminal; (b) light intensity distribution of OAM2 output terminal; (c) light intensity distribution of LO output terminal
    Amplitude distributions of signal light and local oscillator light output terminals. (a) Amplitude distributions of OAM1 and LO (first column) output terminals; (b) amplitude distributions of OAM2 and LO (second column) output terminals
    Phase distributions of signal light and local oscillator light output terminals. (a) Phase distributions of OAM1 and LO (first column) output terminals; (b) phase distributions of OAM2 and LO (second column) output terminals
    Coupling matrix of normalized ideal field and output field
    • Table 1. Simulation parameters of input and output spots

      View table

      Table 1. Simulation parameters of input and output spots

      ParameterContent
      SignalLG10, LG20
      Wavelength /nm1550
      Plane count4
      Signal diameter /μm360
      LO diameter /μm500
      Output spot diameter /μm120
      Output spot distance /μm255
    • Table 2. Phase difference between simulation and ideal results of signal light and local oscillator light output terminals

      View table

      Table 2. Phase difference between simulation and ideal results of signal light and local oscillator light output terminals

      Output endΔθ1i /(°)Δθ2i /(°)Δθ3i /(°)Δθ4i /(°)
      Port 14.27481.62153.11973.2488
      Port 24.2591-10.02842.78724.0659
      Port 33.62522.77943.00963.2708
      Port 4-3.43949.25335.1587-1.2643
    • Table 3. A comparison of coupling coefficient, ΔLi, IL, and MDL in the wavelength range of 1500-1600 nm

      View table

      Table 3. A comparison of coupling coefficient, ΔLi, IL, and MDL in the wavelength range of 1500-1600 nm

      ParameterLP[20]LG(this paper)
      Coupling coefficient0.8960-0.9025 (LG10)
      0.9247-0.9033 (LG20)
      0.9077-0.9138 (LO)
      ΔLi /dB

      1.25-1.75 (signal)

      2.3-3 (LO)

      1.5237-1.6430 (LG10)
      1.0673-1.1512 (LG20)
      2.0597-2.2224 (LO)
      IL /dB-2--1-0.7137--0.6664
      MDL /dB-2--1-3.2643--3.2098
    • Table 4. A comparison of coupling coefficient, ΔLi,IL, and MDL for a pixel range of 3.2-19.2 μm

      View table

      Table 4. A comparison of coupling coefficient, ΔLi,IL, and MDL for a pixel range of 3.2-19.2 μm

      ParameterLP[20]LG(this paper)
      Coupling coefficient0.8979-0.8834 (LG10)
      0.9113-0.9033 (LG20)
      0.9264-0.9114 (LO)
      ΔLi /dB

      0.75-2 (signal)

      2.3-3 (LO)

      2.0638-2.4121 (LG10)
      1.2023-1.0820 (LG20)
      2.4121-2.0638 (LO)
      IL /dB-2--1-0.8097--0.7020
      MDL /dB-1.75--1-3.2353--3.0906
    • Table 5. Simulation parameters of input and output spots

      View table

      Table 5. Simulation parameters of input and output spots

      ParameterContent
      SignalOAM1, OAM2
      Wavelength /nm1550
      Plane count4
      Signal diameter /μm360
      LO diameter /μm500
      Output spot diameter /μm120
      Output spot distance /μm255
    • Table 6. Phase difference between signal light and local oscillator light output terminals

      View table

      Table 6. Phase difference between signal light and local oscillator light output terminals

      OutputΔθ1i /(°)Δθ2i /(°)Δθ3i /(°)Δθ4i /(°)
      Port 15.1525-0.3341-0.80725.8899
      Port 24.18621.56630.74152.6961
      Port 34.84560.5369-1.06686.3869
      Port 40.35108.97461.01062.1095
    • Table 7. A comparison of coupling coefficient, maximum crosstalk, IL and MDL

      View table

      Table 7. A comparison of coupling coefficient, maximum crosstalk, IL and MDL

      ModeLP[20]HG[21]LG [this paper]OAM [this paper]
      Coupling coefficient0.874 (LP01)≥0.760.8983 (LG10)0.8854 (OAM1)
      0.889 (LP11o)0.9269 (LG20)0.8908 (OAM2)
      0.869 (LP11e)
      0.916 (LO)0.9098 (LO)0.8983 (LO)
      Maximum crosstalk0.050.19080.0127
      IL/dB-1.08-2.3-0.7020.9995
      MDL/dB-1.25-1.7-3.23520.1504
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Daifang Guo, Peng Zhang, Xiyu Gong, Yunlong Fan, Shoufeng Tong. Design and Simulation Analysis of Laguerre Gaussian Mode Demultiplexing Hybrid Based on Multi-Plane Light Conversion[J]. Chinese Journal of Lasers, 2022, 49(9): 0906002

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category: fiber optics and optical communications

    Received: Aug. 31, 2021

    Accepted: Oct. 18, 2021

    Published Online: Apr. 22, 2022

    The Author Email: Peng Zhang (zhangpeng@cust.edu.cn)

    DOI:10.3788/CJL202149.0906002

    Topics