[1] [1] BEERC， REICHSTEINM， TOMELLERIE， et al. Terrestrial gross carbon dioxide uptake： Global distribution and covariation with climate［J］. Science， 2010， 329（5993）： 834-838. DOI： 10.1126/science.1184984

[2] [2] FANGJingyun， KEJinhu， TANGZhiyao， et al. Implications and estimations of four terrestrial productivity parameters［J］. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica， 2001， 25（4）： 414-419.

[3] [3] PIAOShilong， HEYue， WANGXuhui， et al. Carbon sequestration estimation of terrestrial ecosystem in China： Method， progress and prospect［J］. Scientia Sinica （Terrae）， 2022， 52（6）： 1010-1020.

[4] [4] YUGuirui， ZHANGLeiming， SUNXiaomin， et al. Research progress on carbon flux observation of terrestrial ecosystems in Asia［J］. Science in China， Ser D， 2004， 34（S2）： 15-29.

[5] [5] BALDOCCHID D. Assessing the eddy covariance technique for evaluating carbon dioxide exchange rates of ecosystems： Past， present and future［J］. Global Change Biology， 2003， 9（4）： 479-492. DOI： 10.1046/j.1365-2486.2003.00629.x

[6] [6] RUNNINGS W， NEMANIR R， HEINSCHF A， et al. A continuous satellite-derived measure of global terrestrial primary production［J］. BioScience， 2004， 54（6）： 547. DOI： 10.1641/0006-3568（2004）054［0547：ACSMOG］2.0.CO2

[7] [7] XIAOX M， HOLLINGERD， ABERJ， et al. Satellite-based modeling of gross primary production in an evergreen needleleaf forest［J］. Remote Sensing of Environment， 2004， 89（4）： 519-534. DOI： 10.1016/j.rse.2003.11.008

[8] [8] YUANW P， LIUS G， ZHOUG S， et al. Deriving a light use efficiency model from eddy covariance flux data for predicting daily gross primary production across biomes［J］. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology， 2007， 143（3/4）： 189-207. DOI： 10.1016/j.agrformet.2006.12.001

[9] [9] BONANG B， LAWRENCEP J， OLESONK W， et al. Improving canopy processes in the Community Land Model version 4 （CLM4） using global flux fields empirically inferred from FLUXNET data［J］. Journal of Geophysical Research， 2011， 116（G2）： G02014. DOI： 10.1029/2010jg001593

[10] [10] CHENJ M， LIUJ， CIHLARJ， et al. Daily canopy photosynthesis model through temporal and spatial scaling for remote sensing applications［J］. Ecological Modelling， 1999， 124（2/3）： 99-119. DOI： 10.1016/S0304-3800（99）00156-8

[11] [11] WANGY L， TIANX J， DUANM Z， et al. Optimal design of surface CO2 observation network to constrain China’s land carbon sink［J］. Science Bulletin， 2023， 68（15）： 1678-1686. DOI： 10.1016/j.scib.2023.07.010

[12] [12] ALTONP， BODINP. A comparative study of a multilayer and a productivity （light-use） efficiency land-surface model over different temporal scales［J］. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology，2010，150（2）：182-195. DOI：10.1016/j.agrformet. 2009.10.001

[13] [13] LUOK W，WANGX L，DE JONGM，et al.Drought triggers and sustains overnight fires in North America［J］.Nature，2024，627（8003）：321-327. DOI：10.1038/s41586-024-07028-5

[14] [14] ZHAOJ， YUEC， WANGJ M， et al. Forest fire size amplifies postfire land surface warming［J］. Nature， 2024， 633（8031）： 828-834. DOI： 10.1038/s41586-024-07918-8

[15] [15] SUNWeiwei， YANGGang， CHENChao， et al. Development status and literature analysis of China’s earth observation remote sensing satellites［J］. Journal of Remote Sensing， 2020， 24（5）： 479-510.

[16] [16] TATEMA J， GOETZS J， HAYS I. Fifty years of earth observation satellites： Views from above have lead to countless advances on the ground in both scientific knowledge and daily life［J］.American Scientist，2008，96（5）：390-398. DOI： 10. 1511/2008.74.390

[17] [17] ANAVA， FRIEDLINGSTEINP， BEERC， et al. Spatiotemporal patterns of terrestrial gross primary production： A review［J］.Reviews of Geophysics，2015，53（3）：785-818. DOI： 10.1002/2015RG000483

[18] [18] RYU Y， BALDOCCHID D， KOBAYASHIH， et al. Integration of MODIS land and atmosphere products with a coupled-process model to estimate gross primary productivity and evapotranspiration from 1 km to global scales［J］. Global Biogeochemical Cycles，2011，25（4）：004053. DOI：10.1029/2011gb 004053

[19] [19] GOWARDS N， TUCKERC J， DYED G. North American vegetation patterns observed with the NOAA-7 advanced very high resolution radiometer［J］.Vegetatio， 1985， 64（1）： 3-14. DOI： 10.1007/BF00033449

[20] [20] BADGLEYG，FIELDC B，BERRYJ A. Canopy near-infrared reflectance and terrestrial photosynthesis［J］. Science Advances，2017，3（3）：e1602244. DOI：10.1126/sciadv.1602244

[21] [21] GITELSONA A， VERMAS B， VIÑAA， et al. Novel technique for remote estimation of CO2 flux in maize［J］. Geophysical Research Letters， 2003， 30（9）： 2002GL016543. DOI： 10.1029/2002gl016543

[22] [22] SUNY， FUR， DICKINSONR， et al. Drought onset mechanisms revealed by satellite solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence： Insights from two contrasting extreme events［J］. Journal of Geophysical Research： Biogeosciences， 2015， 120（11）： 2427-2440. DOI： 10.1002/2015jg003150

[23] [23] MOHAMMEDG H， COLOMBOR， MIDDLETONE M， et al. Remote sensing of Solar-Induced chlorophyll Fluorescence （SIF） in vegetation： 50 years of progress［J］. Remote Sensing of Environment， 2019， 231： 111177. DOI： 10.1016/j.rse.2019.04.030

[24] [24] FRANKENBERGC， FISHERJ B， WORDENJ， et al. New global observations of the terrestrial carbon cycle from GOSAT： Patterns of plant fluorescence with gross primary productivity［J］.2011，38（17）：L17706. DOI： 10.1029/2011GL048738

[25] [25] JOINERJ， GUANTERL， LINDSTROTR， et al. Global monitoring of terrestrial chlorophyll fluorescence from moderate-spectral-resolution near-infrared satellite measurements： Methodology， simulations， and application to GOME-2［J］. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques， 2013， 6（10）： 2803-2823. DOI： 10.5194/amt-6-2803-2013

[26] [26] KÖEHLERP， FRANKENBERGC， MAGNEYT S， et al. Global retrievals of solar induced chlorophyll fluorescence with TROPOMI： First results and inter-sensor comparison to OCO-2［J］. Geophysical Research Letters， 2018， 45（19）： 10456-10463. DOI： 10.1029/2018GL079031

[27] [27] DUS S， LIUL Y， LIUX J， et al. Retrieval of global terrestrial solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence from TanSat satellite［J］. Science Bulletin， 2018， 63（22）： 1502-1512. DOI： 10.1016/j.scib.2018.10.003

[28] [28] WIGNERONJ P， CIAISP， LIX J， et al. Global carbon balance of the forest： Satellite-based L-VOD results over the last decade［J］. Frontiers in Remote Sensing， 2024， 5： 1338618. DOI： 10.3389/frsen.2024.1338618

[29] [29] WILDB，TEUBNERI，MOESINGERL，et al.VODCA2-GPP-a new， global， long-term （1988–2020） gross primary production dataset from microwave remote sensing［J］. Earth System Science Data，2022，14（3）：1063-1085. DOI：10.5194/essd-14-1063-2022

[30] [30] LIUH H， LIUY， CHENY， et al. Dynamics of global dryland vegetation were more sensitive to soil moisture： Evidence from multiple vegetation indices［J］. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology，2023，331：109327. DOI：10.1016/j.agrformet. 2023.109327

[31] [31] WANGS H， ZHANGY G， JUW M， et al. Tracking the seasonal and inter-annual variations of global gross primary production during last four decades using satellite near-infrared reflectance data［J］. Science of The Total Environment， 2021， 755： 142569. DOI： 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142569

[32] [32] LIX， XIAOJ F. A global， 0.05-degree product of solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence derived from OCO-2， MODIS， and reanalysis data［J］. Remote Sensing， 2019， 11（5）： 517. DOI： 10.3390/rs11050517

[33] [33] LIX， XIAOJ F， HEB B. Chlorophyll fluorescence observed by OCO-2 is strongly related to gross primary productivity estimated from flux towers in temperate forests［J］. Remote Sensing of Environment，2018，204： 659-671. DOI：10.1016/j.rse.2017.09.034

[34] [34] YANGF H， ICHIIK， WHITEM A， et al. Developing a continental-scale measure of gross primary production by combining MODIS and AmeriFlux data through Support Vector Machine approach［J］. Remote Sensing of Environment， 2007， 110（1）： 109-122. DOI： 10.1016/j.rse.2007.02.016

[35] [35] JUNGM， REICHSTEINM， MARGOLISH A， et al. Global patterns of land-atmosphere fluxes of carbon dioxide， latent heat， and sensible heat derived from eddy covariance， satellite， and meteorological observations［J］. Journal of Geophysical Research，2011，116：G00J07. DOI：10.1029/2010jg 001566

[36] [36] JOINERJ， YOSHIDAY， ZHANGY， et al. Estimation of terrestrial global Gross Primary Production （GPP） with satellite data-driven models and eddy covariance flux data［J］. Remote Sensing，2018，10（9）：1346. DOI： 10.3390/rs10091346

[37] [37] WEIS H， YIC X， FANGW， et al. A global study of GPP focusing on light-use efficiency in a random forest regression model［J］.Ecosphere，2017，8（5）：e01724. DOI：10.1002/ecs 2.1724

[38] [38] JUNGM，SCHWALMC，MIGLIAVACCAM，et al.Scaling carbon fluxes from eddy covariance sites to globe：Synthesis and evaluation of the FLUXCOM approach［J］.Biogeosciences，2020，17（5）：1343-1365. DOI：10.5194/bg-17-1343-2020

[39] [39] NELSONJ A， WALTHERS， GANSF， et al. X-base： The first terrestrial carbon and water flux products from an extended data-driven scaling framework， fluxcom-X［J］.BiogeoSciences，2024，21：5079-5115. DOI：10.5194/bg-21-5079- 2024

[40] [40] JOINERJ， GUANTERL， LINDSTROTR， et al. Global monitoring of terrestrial chlorophyll fluorescence from moderate-spectral-resolution near-infrared satellite measurements： Methodology， simulations， and application to GOME-2［J］. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques， 2013， 6（10）： 2803-2823. DOI： 10.5194/amt-6-2803-2013

[41] [41] FARQUHARG D， VON CAEMMERERS， BERRYJ A. A biochemical model of photosynthetic CO2 assimilation in leaves of C3 species［J］.Planta，1980，149（1）：78-90. DOI：10. 1007/BF00386231

[42] [42] LIUY B， XIAOJ F， JUW M， et al. Satellite-derived LAI products exhibit large discrepancies and can lead to substantial uncertainty in simulated carbon and water fluxes［J］. Remote Sensing of Environment，2018，206： 174-188. DOI：10.1016/j.rse.2017.12.024

[43] [43] LENGJ， CHENJ M， LIW， et al. Global datasets of hourly carbon and water fluxes simulated using a satellite-based process model with dynamic parameterizations［J］. Earth System Science Data， 2024， 16（3）： 1283-1300.

[44] [44] LIB L， RYU Y， JIANGC Y， et al. BESSv2.0： A satellite-based and coupled-process model for quantifying long-term global land-atmosphere fluxes［J］. Remote Sensing of Environment，2023，295：113696. DOI：10.1016/j.rse.2023.113696

[45] [45] MONTEITHJ L. Solar radiation and productivity in tropical ecosystems［J］. Journal of Applied Ecology，1972，9（3）：747. DOI： 10.2307/2401901

[46] [46] PEIY Y， DONGJ W， ZHANGY， et al. Performance of four state-of-the-art GPP products （VPM， MOD17， BESS and PML） for grasslands in drought years［J］. Ecological Informatics，2020，56：101052. DOI：10.1016/j.ecoinf.2020.101052

[47] [47] YUANW P， ZHENGY， PIAOS L， et al. Increased atmospheric vapor pressure deficit reduces global vegetation growth［J］. Science Advances，2019，5（8）：eaax1396. DOI：10.1126/sciadv.aax1396

[48] [48] HUANGX J， ZHENGY， ZHANGH， et al. High spatial resolution vegetation gross primary production product： Algorithm and validation［J］. Science of Remote Sensing， 2022， 5： 100049. DOI： 10.1016/j.srs.2022.100049

[49] [49] ZHANGY， XIAOX M， WUX C， et al. A global moderate resolution dataset of gross primary production of vegetation for 2000~2016［J］.Scientific Data，2017，4：170165. DOI：10. 1038/sdata.2017.165

[50] [50] JONESL A， KIMBALLJ S， REICHLER H， et al. The SMAP level 4 carbon product for monitoring ecosystem land–atmosphere CO2 exchange［J］. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing， 2017， 55（11）： 6517-6532. DOI： 10.1109/TGRS.2017.2729343

[51] [51] ZHENGY，SHENR Q，WANGY W，et al.Improved estimate of global gross primary production for reproducing its long-term variation，1982-2017［J］.Earth System Science Data，2020，12（4）：2725-2746. DOI：10.5194/essd-12-2725-2020

[52] [52] LINS R， HUANGX J， WANGC Q， et al. A 30-m gross primary production dataset from 2016 to 2020 in China［J］. Scientific Data， 2024， 11： 1065. DOI： 10.1038/s41597-024-03893-x

[53] [53] JOINERJ， YOSHIDAY. Global MODIS and FLUXNET-derived Daily Gross Primary Production，V2， ORNL DAAC， Oak Ridge，Tennessee，USA［DB］.Earth Data［data set］，2021，10.

[54] [54] PINGJ Y， CUIE Q， DUY， et al. Enhanced causal effect of ecosystem photosynthesis on respiration during heatwaves［J］. Science Advances，2023，9（43）： eadi6395. DOI： 10.1126/sciadv.adi6395

[55] [55] PIAOShilong， ZHANGXinping， CHENAnping， et al. Effects of extreme climate events on carbon cycle of terrestrial ecosystem［J］. Scientia Sinica （Terrae）， 2019， 49（9）： 1321-1334.

[56] [56] SIPPELS， REICHSTEINM， MAX L， et al. Drought， heat， and the carbon cycle： A review［J］. Current Climate Change Reports，2018，4（3）：266-286. DOI：10.1007/s40641-018-0103-4

[57] [57] YUANX， WANGY M， JIP， et al. A global transition to flash droughts under climate change［J］. Science， 2023， 380（6641）： 187-191. DOI： 10.1126/science.abn6301

[58] [58] SUNGMINO， PARKS K. Global ecosystem responses to flash droughts are modulated by background climate and vegetation conditions［J］. Communications Earth & Environment， 2024， 5： 88. DOI： 10.1038/s43247-024-01247-4

[59] [59] YAOT T， LIUS X， HUS， et al. Response of vegetation ecosystems to flash drought with solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence over the Hai River Basin， China during 2001–2019［J］. Journal of Environmental Management， 2022， 313： 114947. DOI： 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114947

[60] [60] BASTOSA， CIAISP， FRIEDLINGSTEINP， et al. Direct and seasonal legacy effects of the 2018 heat wave and drought on European ecosystem productivity［J］. Science Advances， 2020， 6（24）： eaba2724. DOI： 10.1126/sciadv.aba2724

[61] [61] XUH T， CHENH W， CHEND L， et al. Global patterns and drivers of post-fire vegetation productivity recovery［J］. Nature Geoscience， 2024， 17（9）： 874-881. DOI： 10.1038/s41561-024-01520-3

[62] [62] DUŠEKJ， ČÍŽKOVÁH， CZERNÝR， et al. Influence of summer flood on the net ecosystem exchange of CO2 in a temperate sedge-grass marsh［J］. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology，2009，149（9）：1524-1530. DOI：10.1016/j.agrformet. 2009.04.007

[63] [63] SHENM G， WANGS P， JIANGN， et al. Plant phenology changes and drivers on the Qinghai–Tibetan Plateau［J］. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment， 2022， 3（10）： 633-651. DOI： 10.1038/s43017-022-00317-5

[64] [64] WANGL， TIANF， HUANGK， et al. Asymmetric patterns and temporal changes in phenology‐based seasonal gross carbon uptake of global terrestrial ecosystems［J］. Global Ecology and Biogeography， 2020， 29（6）： 1020-1033.

[65] [65] WANGS H， JUW M， PEÑUELASJ， et al. Urban-rural gradients reveal joint control of elevated CO2 and temperature on extended photosynthetic seasons［J］. Nature Ecology & Evolution， 2019， 3（7）： 1076-1085. DOI： 10.1038/s41559-019-0931-1

[66] [66] ZHONGZ Q， HEB， WANGY P， et al. Disentangling the effects of vapor pressure deficit on northern terrestrial vegetation productivity［J］.Science Advances，2023，9（32）：eadf 3166. DOI： 10.1126/sciadv.adf3166

[67] [67] WANGL X， JIAOW Z， MACBEANN， et al. Dryland productivity under a changing climate［J］. Nature Climate Change，2022，12（11）：981-994. DOI： 10.1038/s41558-022-01499-y

[68] [68] JIAOW Z， WANGL X， MCCABEM F. Multi-sensor remote sensing for drought characterization： Current status， opportunities and a roadmap for the future［J］. Remote Sensing of Environment，2021，256：112313. DOI：10.1016/j.rse. 2021.112313

[69] [69] YUZ，WANGJ X， LIUS R， et al. Global gross primary productivity and water use efficiency changes under drought stress［J］.Environmental Research Letters，2017，12（1）：014016. DOI： 10.1088/1748-9326/aa5258

[70] [70] LAIOLOP， GABELLANIS， CAMPOL， et al. Impact of different satellite soil moisture products on the predictions of a continuous distributed hydrological model［J］. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation， 2016， 48： 131-145. DOI： 10.1016/j.jag.2015.06.002

[71] [71] LÓPEZ LÓPEZP， SUTANUDJAJAE H， SCHELLEKENSJ， et al. Calibration of a large-scale hydrological model using satellite-based soil moisture and evapotranspiration products［J］. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences， 2017， 21（6）： 3125-3144. DOI： 10.5194/hess-21-3125-2017

[72] [72] LIB L， RYU Y， JIANGC Y， et al. BESSv2.0： A satellite-based and coupled-process model for quantifying long-term global land-atmosphere fluxes［J］. Remote Sensing of Environment，2023，295：113696. DOI：10.1016/j.rse.2023.113696

[73] [73] ZHANGY Q， KONGD D， GANR， et al. Coupled estimation of 500 m and 8 day resolution global evapotranspiration and gross primary production in 2002–2017［J］. Remote Sensing of Environment，2019，222：165-182. DOI：10.1016/j.rse. 2018.12.031

[74] [74] XINQ C， BROICHM， SUYKERA E， et al. Multi-scale evaluation of light use efficiency in MODIS gross primary productivity for croplands in the Midwestern United States［J］. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology， 2015， 201： 111-119. DOI： 10.1016/j.agrformet.2014.11.004

[75] [75] DONGJ， FUY Y， WANGJ J， et al. Early-season mapping of winter wheat in China based on Landsat and Sentinel images［J］. Earth System Science Data， 2020， 12（4）： 3081-3095. DOI： 10.5194/essd-12-3081-2020

[76] [76] DONGJ，LUH B，WANGY W，et al.Estimating winter wheat yield based on a light use efficiency model and wheat variety data［J］. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing，2020，160：18-32. DOI：10.1016/j.isprsjprs. 2019.12.005

[77] [77] AVNERYS， MAUZERALLD L， LIUJ F， et al. Global crop yield reductions due to surface ozone exposure： 1. Year 2000 crop production losses and economic damage［J］. Atmospheric Environment，2011，45（13）：2284-2296. DOI：10. 1016/j.atmosenv.2010.11.045

[78] [78] SHAZ Y， BAIY F， LIR R， et al. The global carbon sink potential of terrestrial vegetation can be increased substantially by optimal land management［J］. Communications Earth & Environment，2022，3：8. DOI：10.1038/s43247-021-00333-1

[79] [79] LIANGW， FUB J， WANGS， et al. Quantification of the ecosystem carrying capacity on China’s Loess Plateau［J］. Ecological Indicators， 2019， 101： 192-202. DOI： 10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.01.020

[80] [80] YANH M， XUEZ C， NIUZ E. Ecological restoration policy should pay more attention to the high productivity grasslands［J］. Ecological Indicators， 2021， 129： 107938. DOI： 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107938

[81] [81] ZHUQ A， CHENH， PENGC H， et al. An early warning signal for grassland degradation on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau［J］. Nature Communications， 2023， 14： 6406. DOI： 10.1038/s41467-023-42099-4

[82] [82] WANGJungbang， YANGYihan， ZUOChan， et al. Impacts of human activities and climate change on gross primary productivity of the terrestrial ecosystems in China［J］.Acta Ecolo-gica Sinica，2021，41（18）：7085-7099.

[83] [83] MIXiangcheng， FENGGang， ZHANGJian， et al. Review on biodiversity science in China［J］. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences， 2021， 36（4）： 384-398.

[84] [84] LEVISS. Modeling vegetation and land use in models of the Earth System［J］. WIREs Climate Change， 2010， 1（6）： 840-856. DOI： 10.1002/wcc.83

[85] [85] STOCKERB D， ZSCHEISCHLERJ， KEENANT F， et al. Drought impacts on terrestrial primary production underestimated by satellite monitoring［J］. Nature Geoscience， 2019， 12（4）： 264-270. DOI： 10.1038/s41561-019-0318-6

[86] [86] LINS R， HUZ M， WANGY P， et al. Underestimated interannual variability of terrestrial vegetation production by terrestrial ecosystem models［J］. Global Biogeochemical Cycles， 2023，37（4）：e2023GB007696. DOI：10.1029/2023GB007696

[87] [87] KOLBY SMITHW， REEDS C， CLEVELANDC C， et al. Large divergence of satellite and Earth system model estimates of global terrestrial CO2 fertilization［J］. Nature Climate Change， 2015， 6（3）： 306-310. DOI： 10.1038/nclimate2879

[88] [88] LINShangrong， LIJing， LIUQinhuo. Overview on estimation accuracy of gross primary productivity with remote sensing methods［J］. Journal of Remote Sensing， 2018， 22（2）： 234-252.

[89] [89] YUANW P， CAIW W， XIAJ Z， et al. Global comparison of light use efficiency models for simulating terrestrial vegetation gross primary production based on the LaThuile database［J］. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology， 2014， 192： 108-120. DOI： 10.1016/j.agrformet.2014.03.007

[90] [90] LINS R， LIJ， LIUQ H， et al. Improved global estimations of gross primary productivity of natural vegetation types by incorporating plant functional type［J］. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation， 2021， 100： 102328. DOI： 10.1016/j.jag.2021.102328

[91] [91] LINS R，HUANGX J，WANGC Q，et al. A 30-m gross primary production dataset from 2016 to 2020 in China［J］.Scientific Data，2024，11：1065.DOI：10.1038/s41597-024-03893-x

[92] [92] LIX Q， PENGQ Y， ZHENGY， et al. Incorporating environmental variables into spatiotemporal fusion model to reconstruct high-quality vegetation index data［J］. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing， 2024， 62： 4401812.

[93] [93] DONGJ Q， LIL H， LIY Z， et al. Inter-comparisons of mean， trend and interannual variability of global terrestrial gross primary production retrieved from remote sensing approach［J］. Science of The Total Environment， 2022， 822： 153343. DOI： 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153343

[94] [94] YANGR Q， WANGJ， ZENGN， et al. Divergent historical GPP trends among state-of-the-art multi-model simulations and satellite-based products［J］. Earth System Dynamics， 2022， 13（2）： 833-849. DOI： 10.5194/esd-13-833-2022

[95] [95] ZHANGZ Y， CESCATTIA， WANGY P， et al. Large diurnal compensatory effects mitigate the response of Amazonian forests to atmospheric warming and drying［J］.Science Advances，2023，9（21）：eabq4974. DOI：10.1126/sciadv.abq4974

[96] [96] WATTM S， BUDDENBAUMH， LEONARDOE M C， et al. Monitoring biochemical limitations to photosynthesis in N and P-limited radiata pine using plant functional traits quantified from hyperspectral imagery［J］. Remote Sensing of Environment，2020，248：112003. DOI：10.1016/j.rse.2020.112003

[97] [97] FANGJ C， CHENB Z， WANGF， et al. Nitrogen， phosphorus， and potassium co-limitation in terrestrial ecosystems： A global meta-analysis［J］. Plants，People， Planet， 2024， 6（6）： 1329-1340. DOI： 10.1002/ppp3.10524

[98] [98] SUNY H， PENGD， GUANX B， et al. Impacts of the data quality of remote sensing vegetation index on gross primary productivity estimation［J］.GIScience & Remote Sensing， 2023，60（1）：2275421. DOI：10.1080/15481603.2023. 2275421

[99] [99] ROBINSONN P， ALLREDB W， SMITHW K， et al. Terrestrial primary production for the conterminous United States derived from Landsat 30 m and MODIS 250 m［J］. Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation， 2018， 4（3）： 264-280. DOI： 10.1002/rse2.74

[100] [100] JEONGS， RYU Y， LIX， et al. GEOSIF： A continental-scale sub-daily reconstructed solar-induced fluorescence derived from OCO-3 and GK-2A over Eastern Asia and Oceania［J］. Remote Sensing of Environment， 2024， 311： 114284. DOI： 10.1016/j.rse.2024.114284

[101] [101] ZHANGZ Y， GUANTERL， PORCAR-CASTELLA， et al. Global modeling diurnal gross primary production from OCO-3 solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence［J］. Remote Sensing of Environment， 2023， 285： 113383. DOI： 10.1016/j.rse.2022.113383

[102] [102] LINS R， HAOD L， ZHENGY， et al. Multi-site assessment of the potential of fine resolution red-edge vegetation indices for estimating gross primary production［J］. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation， 2022， 113： 102978. DOI：10.1016/j.jag.2022.102978

[103] [103] DIERSSENH M， GIERACHM， GUILDL S， et al. Synergies between NASA’s hyperspectral aquatic missions PACE， GLIMR， and SBG： Opportunities for new science and applications［J］. Journal of Geophysical Research： Biogeosciences， 2023，128（10）：e2023JG007574. DOI：10.1029/2023jg007574

[104] [104] WINKLERA J， MYNENIR B， HANNARTA， et al. Slowdown of the greening trend in natural vegetation with further rise in atmospheric CO2［J］. Biogeosciences， 2021， 18（17）： 4985-5010. DOI： 10.5194/bg-18-4985-2021

[105] [105] CORTÉSJ， MAHECHAM D， REICHSTEINM， et al. Where are global vegetation greening and browning trends significant？［J］. Geophysical Research Letters， 2021， 48（6）： e2020GL091496. DOI： 10.1029/2020gl091496

[106] [106] CAOS， LIM Y， ZHUZ C， et al. Spatiotemporally consistent global dataset of the GIMMS Leaf Area Index （GIMMS LAI4g） from 1982 to 2020［J］. Earth System Science Data， 2023，15（11）：4877-4899. DOI：10.5194/essd-15-4877-2023

[107] [107] JEONGS， RYU Y， GENTINEP， et al. Persistent global greening over the last four decades using novel long-term vegetation index data with enhanced temporal consistency［J］. Remote Sensing of Environment，2024，311：114282. DOI：10. 1016/j.rse.2024.114282

[108] [108] LINS R， HUZ M， WANGY P， et al. Underestimated interannual variability of terrestrial vegetation production by terrestrial ecosystem models［J］. Global Biogeochemical Cycles， 2023，37（4）：e2023GB007696. DOI：10.1029/2023GB007696

[109] [109] DONGJ Q， LIL H， LIY Z， et al. Inter-comparisons of mean， trend and interannual variability of global terrestrial gross primary production retrieved from remote sensing approach［J］. Science of The Total Environment， 2022， 822： 153343. DOI： 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153343

[110] [110] WANGS， FUB J， WEIF L， et al. Drylands contribute disproportionately to observed global productivity increases［J］. Science Bulletin， 2023， 68（2）： 224-232. DOI： 10.1016/j.scib.2023.01.014

[111] [111] KANNENBERGS A，ANDEREGGW R L，BARNESM L，et al. Dominant role of soil moisture in mediating carbon and water fluxes in dryland ecosystems［J］. Nature Geoscience， 2024， 17（1）： 38-43. DOI： 10.1038/s41561-023-01351-8

[112] [112] WANGS， FUB J， WEIF L， et al. Drylands contribute disproportionately to observed global productivity increases［J］. Science Bulletin， 2023， 68（2）： 224-232. DOI： 10.1016/j.scib.2023.01.014

[113] [113] LIUL B， GUDMUNDSSONL， HAUSERM， et al. Soil moisture dominates dryness stress on ecosystem production globally［J］. Nature Communications， 2020， 11： 4892. DOI： 10.1038/s41467-020-18631-1

[114] [114] LUH B， QINZ C， LINS R， et al. Large influence of atmospheric vapor pressure deficit on ecosystem production efficiency［J］. Nature Communications， 2022， 13： 1653. DOI： 10.1038/s41467-022-29009-w

[115] [115] LEBAUERD S， TRESEDERK K. Nitrogen limitation of net primary productivity in terrestrial ecosystems is globally distributed［J］. Ecology， 2008， 89（2）： 371-379. DOI： 10.1890/06-2057.1

[116] [116] ZHANGH L， BAIJ， SUNR， et al. An improved light use efficiency model by considering canopy nitrogen concentrations and multiple environmental factors［J］. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology，2023，332：109359. DOI：10.1016/j.agrformet. 2023.109359

[117] [117] DUE Z， TERRERC， PELLEGRINIA F A， et al. Global patterns of terrestrial nitrogen and phosphorus limitation［J］. Nature Geoscience， 2020， 13（3）： 221-226. DOI： 10.1038/s41561-019-0530-4

[118] [118] HOUE Q， LUOY Q， KUANGY W， et al. Global meta-analysis shows pervasive phosphorus limitation of aboveground plant production in natural terrestrial ecosystems［J］. Nature Communications，2020，11：637. DOI：10.1038/s41467-020-14492-w

[119] [119] JIANGM K， CROUSK Y， CARRILLOY， et al. Microbial competition for phosphorus limits the CO2 response of a mature forest［J］. Nature， 2024， 630（8017）： 660-665. DOI： 10.1038/s41586-024-07491-0

[120] [120] CHENB Z， FANGJ C， PIAOS L， et al. A meta-analysis highlights globally widespread potassium limitation in terrestrial ecosystems［J］. New Phytologist， 2024， 241（1）： 154-165. DOI： 10.1111/nph.19294

[121] [121] WANGF， FANGJ C， YAOL， et al. Applications of land surface model to economic and environmental-friendly optimization of nitrogen fertilization and irrigation［J］.Heliyon，2024， 10（6）： e27549. DOI： 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27549