Chinese Optics Letters, Volume. 22, Issue 6, 061201(2024)

Generic and flexible self-correction method for nonlinearity-induced phase error in three-dimensional imaging

Jianhua Wang1、*, Peng Xu1, and Yanxi Yang2
Author Affiliations
  • 1School of Information and Control Engineering, Qingdao University of Technology, Qingdao 266520, China
  • 2School of Automation and Information Engineering, Xi’an University of Technology, Xi’an 710048, China
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(9)
    Illustration of the additional wrapped phase translation and phase error correction. (a) Captured fringe. (b) Original wrapped phase ϕ. (c) Additional wrapped phase ϕA. (d) Cross sections in panels (b) and (c). (e) Generation of ϕS, ϕA-S, and ϕF.
    Two situations that induce a line of wrapped phase to fail to calculate S. (a) ϕA has one more phase jump than ϕ. (b) ϕ has one more phase jump than ϕA.
    3D reconstruction results of the fox mask. (a) Traditional 3-step PS method. (b) Proposed GSCN method. (c) Comparison of the cross sections of the reconstruction results. (d) Close-up of the cross sections.
    3D reconstruction results of the Venus statue. (a) Deformed fringe patterns. (b) Original wrapped phase ϕ. (c) Additional wrapped phase ϕA. (d) Comparison of a section of the wrapped phase ϕ and ϕA. (e) Generation of ϕS, ϕA-S, and ϕF. (f) 3-step PS method. (g) Proposed GSCN method. (h) Cross-section comparison of the reconstruction results. (i) Close-up of the cross section.
    3D reconstruction results of the dental cast. (a) Dental cast with stepped surfaces. (b) Captured fringe pattern. (c) Traditional 3-step PS method. (d) Proposed GSCN method. (e) Comparison of the cross sections of the reconstruction results. (f) Close-up of the cross sections.
    3D reconstruction results of the David statue and dental cast. (a) Deformed fringe patterns. (b) Fused wrapped phase. (c) Wrapped phase comparison. (d) 3-step PS method. (e) Proposed GSCN method. (f) Hilbert transform method. (g) Double 3-step PS method. (h) 12-step PS method. (i) Phase errors of the four methods.
    Reconstruction results of the Rui-Shou mask. (a) Real image. (b) Deformation fringe pattern. (c) Hilbert transform result of (a). (d) Intensity comparison. (e) Reconstruction result using the 12-step phase-shifting method. (f) Reconstruction result using the 3-step phase-shifting method. (g) Reconstruction result using the proposed method. (h) Reconstruction result using the Hilbert transform method.
    • Table 1. Phase Error Comparison of the Elephant Model (in rad)

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 1. Phase Error Comparison of the Elephant Model (in rad)

      Approach3-stepProposedDouble 3-stepHilbert
      RMSE0.15570.05590.04160.0645
      MAE0.41760.14130.07860.1216
      LE0.48330.29093.38363.3382
    • Table 2. Phase Error Comparison of the Rui-Shou Mask (in rad)

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 2. Phase Error Comparison of the Rui-Shou Mask (in rad)

      MethodMAELERMSE
      3-step0.41310.54080.1592
      Proposed0.11920.31420.0480
      Hilbert0.11613.26620.0642
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Jianhua Wang, Peng Xu, Yanxi Yang, "Generic and flexible self-correction method for nonlinearity-induced phase error in three-dimensional imaging," Chin. Opt. Lett. 22, 061201 (2024)

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category: Instrumentation, Measurement, and Optical Sensing

    Received: Dec. 19, 2023

    Accepted: Feb. 19, 2024

    Posted: Feb. 19, 2024

    Published Online: Jun. 20, 2024

    The Author Email: Jianhua Wang (wangjianhua@qut.edu.cn)

    DOI:10.3788/COL202422.061201

    CSTR:32184.14.COL202422.061201

    Topics