Matter and Radiation at Extremes, Volume. 10, Issue 1, 017801(2025)

Macroscopic perspective on phase transition behavior of natural single-crystal graphite under different pressure environments

Xiaoshuang Yin1、*, Songyang Li2, Lijuan Wang1, Peiyuan Liu1, Zhihai Cheng2, Huiyang Gou1, and Liuxiang Yang1
Author Affiliations
  • 1Center for High Pressure Science and Technology Advanced Research, Beijing 100193, China
  • 2Key Laboratory of Quantum State Construction and Manipulation (Ministry of Education), Department of Physics, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(7)
    (a) Optical image of SCG, with the upper left insert showing an SEM image of SCG after laser cutting. (b) Raman spectrum of laser-cut SCG with a 532 nm excitation laser under ambient conditions.
    (a) Optical photographs of SCG surface morphology under different pressures in Ar. (b) and (c) 2D FrequencyG distribution imaging maps and 2D FWHMG distribution imaging maps of SCG under different pressures in Ar, respectively. Images were acquired at 1.5, 6.5, 18.0, 19.3, 21.3, and 28.3 GPa.
    (a) and (b) Distribution diagrams of FrequencyG and FWHMG, respectively, under different pressures in Ar. The solid line represents the Gaussian fit to the statistical distribution. (c) Raman spectra of folding area (red solid lines) and planar area (blue solid lines) of SCG under different pressures. The upper right insert is an optical image of SCG at 19.3 GPa, and the red and blue dashed boxes are enlarged images of the Raman spectrum acquisition positions of the folding and planar areas, respectively.
    (a) Optical photographs of SCG surface morphology acquired at 2.1, 11.0, 18.8, and 25.8 GPa in He. (b) Optical photographs of changes in SCG morphology with time at the pressure of 18.8 GPa, taken at 1 s, 3 s, 6 min, 17 min, and 10 h. (d) Optical photographs of SCG surface morphology acquired at 4., 12.0, 16.1, and 20.5 GPa in cBN. (d) Optical photographs of changes in SCG morphology with time at the pressure of 16.1 GPa, taken at 1 s, 5 min, 17 min, 27 min, and 10 h.
    (a) and (b) 2D FrequencyG and 2D FWHMG distribution imaging maps of SCG surface acquired at 2.1, 11.0, 18.8, and 25.8 GPa in He. (c) and (d) Statistical diagrams of FrequencyG and FWHMG distributions, respectively, under different pressures in He.
    (a) and (b) 2D FrequencyG and 2D FWHMG distribution imaging maps of SCG surface acquired at 4.2, 12.0, 16.1, and 20.5 GPa in cBN. (c) and (d) Statistical diagrams of FrequencyG and FWHMG distributions, respectively, under different pressures in cBN.
    (a)–(c) SEM images of pristine SCG, SCG recovered from Ar (28.3 GPa), and SCG recovered from He (25.8 GPa), respectively. The yellow dotted boxes and arrows show the AFM scanning areas and directions. (d)–(f) 2D AFM images corresponding to the positions indicated by the yellow dotted boxes in (a)–(c), respectively. The bottom left inserts how the size distributions of striped segmented regions. (g)–(i) 3D AFM images corresponding to the positions indicated by the yellow dotted boxes in (a)–(c), respectively.
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Xiaoshuang Yin, Songyang Li, Lijuan Wang, Peiyuan Liu, Zhihai Cheng, Huiyang Gou, Liuxiang Yang. Macroscopic perspective on phase transition behavior of natural single-crystal graphite under different pressure environments[J]. Matter and Radiation at Extremes, 2025, 10(1): 017801

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category:

    Received: Aug. 22, 2024

    Accepted: Sep. 25, 2024

    Published Online: Feb. 21, 2025

    The Author Email:

    DOI:10.1063/5.0234582

    Topics