Fig. 1. Three dispersion compensation schemes. (a) Pre-, (b) post-, and (c) symmetrical-compensations

Fig. 2. Transmission results of the three compensation schemes without consideration of IFWM. (a) Pulse shape and (b) spectrum

Fig. 3. Transmission results of the three compensation schemes with consideration of IFWM. (a) Pulse shape and (b) spectrum

Fig. 4. Performance comparison of pre-, post-, and symmetrical-compensations at 80 Gb/s. Variation of (a) ΔPaver and (b) the relative peak intensity of the ghost pulse with transmission distance

Fig. 5. Performance comparison of pre-, post-, and symmetrical-compensations at 40 Gb/s. Variation of (a) ΔPaver and (b) the relative peak intensity of the ghost pulse with transmission distance

Fig. 6. Performance comparison of pre-, post-, and symmetrical-compensations at 20 Gb/s. Variation of (a) ΔPaver and (b) the relative peak intensity of the ghost pulse with transmission distance