[1] [1] Denstedt J, Gabrigna B F C. Thulium fiber laser lithotripsy: Is it living up to the hype?[J]. Asian Journal of Urology, 2023, 10(3): 289-297.

[2] [2] Ventimiglia, Eugenio, Steeve Doizi, et al. Effect of temporal pulse shapeon urinary sto-nephantom retropulsion rate and ablation efficiency using Holmium: YAG and superpulse Thulium fibre lasers[J]. BJU International, 2020, 126(1): 159-167.

[3] [3] Andreeva Viktoria, Vinarov Andrey, Yaroslavsky Ilya, et al. Preclinical comparison of sup-erpulse thulium fiber laser and a holmium: YAG laser for lithotripsy[J]. World journal of urology, 2020, 38(2): 497-503.

[4] [4] Hardy L A, Vinnichenko V, Fried N M. High power holmium: YAG versus thulium fiber laser treatment of kidney stones in dusting mode: ablation rate and fragment size studies[J]. Lasers in surgery and medicine, 2019, 51(6): 522-530.

[5] [5] Traxer Olivier, Keller Etienne Xavier. Thulium fiber laser: the new player for kidney stone treatment? A comparison with Holmium: YAG laser[J]. World journal of urology, 2020, 38(8): 1883-1894.

[6] [6] Panthier, Doizi, Lapouge, et al. Comparison of the ablation rates, fissures and fragments produced with 150 m and 272 m laser fibers with superpulsed thulium fiber laser: an in vitro study[J]. World journal of urology, 2021, 39(6): 1683-1691.

[7] [7] Jones, Beisland, Ulvik, et al. Current status of thulium fibre laser lithotripsy: an uptodate review[J]. BJU International, 2021, 128(5): 531538.

[8] [8] Ulvikyvind, sy Mathias Srstrand, Julieb-Jones Patrick, et al. Thulium Fibre Laser versus Holmium: YAG for Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy: Outcomes from a Prospective Randomised Clinical Trial[J]. European urology, 2022, 82(1): 73-79.

[10] [10] Ahmad Para Sajad, Saleem Wani Mohammad, Hamid Arif, et al. Incidence of Ureteric-strictures Following Ureteroscopic Laser Lithotripsy: Holmium: YAG Versus Thulium Fiber Laser[J]. Urology research & practice, 2023, 49(3): 198-204.

[11] [11] Fried N M, Irby P B. Advances in laser technology and fibreoptic delivery systems- in lithotripsy[J]. Nature Reviews Urology, 2018, 15(9): 563-573.

[12] [12] Lekarev Vladimir, Dymov Alim, Vinarov Andrey, et al. Mechanism of Lithotripsy by Superpulse Thulium Fiber Laser and Its Clinical Efficiency[J]. Applied Sciencesb-asel, 2020, 10(21): 7480.

[14] [14] Zhang J J, Xuan J R, Yu H G, et al. Study of cavitation bubble dynamics during H-o: YAG laser lithotripsy by high-speed camera[J]. S. N., 2016, 9689: 96891-96891+7.

[15] [15] Keller EX, de Coninck V, Audouin M, et al. Fragments and dust after Holmium laser lit-hotripsy with or without “Moses technology”: How are they different?[J]. Biophotonics, 2019, 12(4): e201800227.

[17] [17] Chiron P H, Berthe L L, Coninck V D. Comparison of vapor bubbles induced by an h-olmium: YAG Laser and a SuperPusled Thulium Fiber Laser.[J]. Journal of Endourology, 2018, 32: 40-45.

[18] [18] Wang Z, Zhang Y, Zhang J, et al. Recent advances on the mechanisms of kidney stone formation (Review).[J]. International Journal of Molecular Medicine, 2021, 48(2): 149.