Acta Optica Sinica, Volume. 45, Issue 18, 1801004(2025)

Research Progress and Development Trends on Hyperspectral Lidar Remote Sensing Technology (Invited)

Yihua Hu1,2,3, Yuhao Xia1,2,3、*, Shilong Xu1,2,3、**, Xinyuan Zhang1,2,3, Wanying Ding1,2,3, Shengjie Ma1,2,3, Fei Wang1,2,3, Xiao Dong1,2,3, Jiajie Fang1,2,3, and Fei Han1,2,3
Author Affiliations
  • 1Advanced Laser Technology Laboratory of Anhui Province, College of Electronic Engineering, National University of Defense Technology, Hefei 230037, Anhui , China
  • 2Information Security Research Center, Hefei Comprehensive National Science Center, Hefei 230037, Anhui , China
  • 3Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Electronic Restriction, National University of Defense Technology, Hefei 230037, Anhui , China
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(13)
    Representative HSL architectures. (a) Pre-emission spectral division; (b) post-reception spectral division
    Schematic and photographs of current HSL systems developed by different research institutions. (a) FGI’s portable 8-channel HSL[21]; (b) CAS’s HSL based on liquid crystal tunable filter (LCTF)[30]; (c) CAS’s ground-based 32-channel HSL[31]; (d) Wuhan University’s ground-based 32-channel HSL[32]; (e) Wuhan University’s airborne 56-channel HSL[28]; (f) Heriot-Watt University’s multi-spectral lidar based on acousto-optic tunable filter (AOTF)[33]; (g) Anhui University of Architecture’s 101-channel HSL[1]
    Multichannel waveforms of HSL and technical route of hyperspectral waveform decomposition. (a) Multichannel waveforms of HSL[41]; (b) technical route of hyperspectral waveform decomposition
    Three single-wavelength waveform decomposition methods. (a) Direct decomposition[48]; (b) deconvolution waveform decomposition[49]; (c) RJMCMC[33]
    Comparison of prevailing multi/hyperspectral waveform decomposition methods with single-wavelength waveform decomposition methods. (a) Multi waveform decomposition[50]; (b) hyperspectral waveform decomposition[28]
    Impact and correction of distance effect[27]. (a) Distance effect; (b) distance effect correction
    Impact and correction of incident angle effect[31]. (a) Incident angle effect; (b) incident angle effect correction
    Impact and correction of sub-footprint effect. (a) Sub-footprint effect mechanism[68]; (b)‒(c) sub-footprint effect correction[70]
    HSL point cloud imaging technology. (a) Color restoration[74]; (b) imaging of ancient architecture[8]; (c) eliminating ‘highlight’ effect[75]
    Application of HSL point cloud classification. (a) Wood, leaf, and fruit separation[1]; (b) multi-target classification[80]; (c) land cover classification[5]
    Various applications of spectral information from HSL. (a) Detection of plant nitrogen and chlorophyll content distribution[89-90]; (b) pest and disease detection[20]; (c) coal and rock identification and classification[9,91]
    • Table 1. Comparison of typical HSL systems in various research institutions

      View table

      Table 1. Comparison of typical HSL systems in various research institutions

      Research institutionWavelength /nmNumber of channelsSpectral resolution /nmSpectral splittingDetectionrange /mApplication
      FGI[21]450‒10008~50 per channelGrating~20Mineral exploration, rock classification
      Wuhan University[32]450‒9103212Grating<50Monitoring vegetation physiological and biochemical parameters
      Wuhan University[28]

      400‒900

      (airborne)

      56<10Grating≥500Airborne applications
      CAS AIR[31,34]450‒9143210Grating<25Constructing vegetation indices, monitoring vegetation growth status and ecological parameters
      CAS AIR[30]550‒7201710LCTF

      <10

      (1.5)

      Heriot-Watt University[33,35]Visible to near-infrared4‒32<10AOTF wavelengthscanning45Vegetation monitoring
      Anhui Jianzhu University[1]550‒10501015

      AOTF wavelength

      scanning

      <50Coal rock classification, ancient architecture modeling, vegetation
    • Table 2. Research progress of hyperspectral waveform decomposition methods

      View table

      Table 2. Research progress of hyperspectral waveform decomposition methods

      MethodPulse width /nsNumber of spectral channelsSampling rate /GHzTrue neighbor distance /cmMeasured neighbordistance /cmImprovement effect
      MSWD23(556, 670, 780 nm)1.82019.58RNDE decreased from (0.0566‒0.2833) to (0.0100‒0.0610)
      MIWD440(436‒804 nm)24344.58Background noise reduced by over 3 times, SNR increased by nearly 10 dB, ranging accuracy improved by over 2 times
      RREM4

      66

      (600‒925 nm)

      555.32Improve the range resolution from 60 to 5 cm at most for a 4-ns width laser pulse
      MCMCD4

      66

      (600‒925 nm)

      54544.83Decomposition accuracy improved by 20.1%, target ranging accuracy error reduced from 0.1253 to 0.0037

      Rclonte\

      Rclont-M

      1.7

      32

      (409‒912 nm)

      52825.63/25.83Average RNDE for measuring adjacent targets ranges from 0.026 to 0.085, effectively restoring spectral information
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Yihua Hu, Yuhao Xia, Shilong Xu, Xinyuan Zhang, Wanying Ding, Shengjie Ma, Fei Wang, Xiao Dong, Jiajie Fang, Fei Han. Research Progress and Development Trends on Hyperspectral Lidar Remote Sensing Technology (Invited)[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2025, 45(18): 1801004

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category: Atmospheric Optics and Oceanic Optics

    Received: Jan. 22, 2025

    Accepted: Jul. 23, 2025

    Published Online: Sep. 19, 2025

    The Author Email: Yuhao Xia (skl_hyh@163.com), Shilong Xu (xushi1988@yeah.net)

    DOI:10.3788/AOS250537

    CSTR:32393.14.AOS250537

    Topics