Chinese Journal of Lasers, Volume. 51, Issue 12, 1202101(2024)
Effects of Beam Quality on Laser Welding Efficiency and Yield of Aluminum Alloy
Fig. 2. Influence of welding speed and M2 on weld surface morphology and weld morphology. Surface morphology: (a) M2=1.18, v=228 mm/s; (c) M2=1.18, v=255 mm/s; (e) M2=1.25, v=228 mm/s; (g) M2=1.25, v=262 mm/s; (i) M2=2.39, v=175 mm/s; (k) M2=2.39, v=215 mm/s; (m) M2=6.6, v=77 mm/s; (o) M2=6.6, v=84 mm/s; (q) M2=6.74, v=60 mm/s; (s) M2=6.74, v=120 mm/s; (u) M2= 11.6, v=40 mm/s; (w) M2=11.6, v=67 mm/s. Melting depth and width: (b) M2=1.18, v=228 mm/s; (d) M2=1.18, v=255 mm/s; (f) M2=1.25, v=228 mm/s; (h) M2=1.25, v=262 mm/s; (j) M2=2.39, v=175 mm/s; (l) M2=2.39, v=215 mm/s; (n) M2=6.6, v=77 mm/s; (p) M2=6.6, v=84 mm/s; (r) M2=6.74, v=60 mm/s; (t) M2=6.74, v=120 mm/s; (v) M2=11.6, v=40 mm/s; (x) M2=11.6, v=67 mm/s
Fig. 4. Influence of M2 on laser welding efficiency and CPK value. (a) Welding speed; (b) CPK value
Fig. 5. Influence of M2 on energy distribution characteristic in laser welding of aluminum. XOY plane: (a) M2=1.18; (d) M2=1.25; (g) M2=2.39; (j) M2=6.60; (m) M2=6.74; (p) M2=11.6. XOZ plane: (b) M2=1.18; (e) M2=1.25; (h) M2=2.39; (k) M2=6.60; (n) M2=6.74; (q) M2=11.6. YOZ plane: (c) M2=1.18; (f) M2=1.25; (i) M2=2.39; (l) M2=6.60; (o) M2=6.74; (r) M2=11.6
Fig. 6. Influence of M2 on extreme difference in energy density and occupied space line density. (a) Extreme difference;(b) occupied space line density
|
|
|
Get Citation
Copy Citation Text
Shuai Zhang, Tongzheng Liu, Zhihong Xu, Xiaoguang Dai, Zhaohui Zhu, Ming Gao, Shaofeng Guo. Effects of Beam Quality on Laser Welding Efficiency and Yield of Aluminum Alloy[J]. Chinese Journal of Lasers, 2024, 51(12): 1202101
Category: Laser Forming Manufacturing
Received: Jun. 12, 2023
Accepted: Sep. 5, 2023
Published Online: Jan. 26, 2024
The Author Email: Gao Ming (mgao@mail.hust.edu.cn)
CSTR:32183.14.CJL230909