Acta Optica Sinica, Volume. 38, Issue 8, 0815024(2018)

Surface Crack Segmentation Based on Multi-Scale Wavelet Transform and Structured Forest

Sen Wang*, Xing Wu*, Yinhui Zhang, and Qing Chen
Author Affiliations
  • Faculty of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, Yunnan 650500, China
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(13)
    Flowchart of SFW method
    Flowchart of modulus maxima edge detection method with wavelet semi-reconfiguration
    13 feature channels of wall crack
    Feature vectors and structured labels
    Qualitative comparisons of wavelets with traditional detection methods. (a) Original image; (b) GT; (c) hrbio1.1-1; (d) rbior1.1-2; (e) sym2-1; (f) coif1-1; (g) dyadic-2; (h) dmey-1; (i) Prewitt; (j) Sobel; (k) Robert; (l) Canny; (m) Log
    ROC curves and RPFM bars of six wavelets and six other methods. (a) ROC curves; (b) RPFM bars
    Quantitative comparisons of SFW classifier in train and validation. (a) nSample; (b) nCell; (c) normRad; (d) chSmooth; (e) simSmooth; (f) imWidth; (g) gtWidth; (h) fracFtrs; (i) maxDepth; (j) minChild; (k) sharpen; (l) nTree
    Qualitative comparisons of different methods. (a) Original image 1; (b) GT1; (c) hrbio1.1-1; (d) rbior1.1-2; (e) dyadic-2; (f) sym2-1; (g) coif1-1; (h) dmey-1; (i) original image 2; (j) GT2; (k) SFW-M (hrbio1.1-1); (l) SFW-1; (m) SFD-M; (n) SFD-1; (o) FCN-8s; (p) MDW Ncut
    ROC curve and RPFM bars of 11 methods. (a) ROC curves; (b) RPFM bars
    Quantitative comparisons of 5 methods. (a) Original image; (b) GT; (c) SFW; (d) FCN-8s; (e) SFD; (f) Canny; (g) original image; (h) GT; (i) SFW; (j) FCN-8s; (k) SFD; (l) Canny
    ROC curves of two types of images with five methods. (a) First type; (b) second type
    • Table 1. Average comparisons of 11 methods with 5 quantitative methods

      View table

      Table 1. Average comparisons of 11 methods with 5 quantitative methods

      MethodRPFMAETime /s
      hrbio1.10.78620.61520.64770.10040.5107
      rbio1.10.78090.61370.64560.11740.5547
      dyadic0.76340.60800.63800.10901.2804
      sym20.77950.61330.64500.12000.5231
      coif10.77410.61150.64270.10240.6539
      dmey-10.75430.60510.63410.15130.8794
      SFW-10.76190.60470.63720.24830.1220
      SFD- M0.77520.61160.64290.04870.3636
      SFD-10.76050.60670.63640.04970.0841
      FCN-8s0.77070.61080.64150.02141.3646
      M Ncut0.72280.59400.61950.10342.0019
    • Table 2. Quantitative comparisons of five methods

      View table

      Table 2. Quantitative comparisons of five methods

      Image typeParameterSFWFCN-8sSFDCanny
      Crack images ofthe unevenillumination surfaceR0.85050.80090.79610.7813
      P0.63060.61630.61490.6104
      F0.67070.65090.64900.6429
      MAE0.01350.00440.01630.0093
      Time /s0.75310.27370.28140.1165
      Crack imagesof the contaminatedsurfaceR0.83170.66100.81800.7347
      P0.62550.56980.62150.5957
      F0.66340.58850.65800.6229
      MAE0.00930.00560.00890.0094
      Time / s0.75310.27370.28140.1165
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Sen Wang, Xing Wu, Yinhui Zhang, Qing Chen. Surface Crack Segmentation Based on Multi-Scale Wavelet Transform and Structured Forest[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2018, 38(8): 0815024

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category: Machine Vision

    Received: Jan. 9, 2018

    Accepted: May. 2, 2018

    Published Online: Sep. 6, 2018

    The Author Email:

    DOI:10.3788/AOS201838.0815024

    Topics