Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, Volume. 61, Issue 24, 2415003(2024)

Disparity Estimation Method Based on an Improved ACV Model

Lunming Qin1、*, Bin Yu1, Haoyang Cui1, Houqin Bian1, and Xi Wang2
Author Affiliations
  • 1College of Electronics and Information Engineering, Shanghai University of Electric Power, Shanghai 201306, China
  • 2School of Electronic and Information Engineering, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(10)
    Overall network structure of MS-ACV
    Multi-scale feature fusion network structure
    Sceneflight disparity maps with Sobel loss added separately. (a) Fine line prediction; (b) columnar structure prediction; (c) tire prediction
    Sceneflight disparity maps separately incorporating multi-scale feature fusion network. (a) Bonsai prediction; (b) motorcycle prediction; (c) bicycle prediction
    Sceneflow disparity maps of the whole network. (a) Headphone cable prediction; (b) bonsai and fine line prediction; (c) barrel texture prediction
    KITTI disparity maps of the whole network. (a) Pedestrian prediction; (b) roadside lamppost prediction; (c) pedestrian prediction
    • Table 1. Only the ablation analysis of the attention branch trained on Sceneflow dataset

      View table

      Table 1. Only the ablation analysis of the attention branch trained on Sceneflow dataset

      MethodEPE /pixelD1 /%
      ACV0.7982.91
      ACV+Sobel0.6912.54
      ACV+multi_fea_fusion0.7862.87
      ACV+Sobel+multi_fea_fusion (MS-ACV)0.6872.54
    • Table 2. Only the ablation analysis of parallax branches trained on Sceneflow dataset

      View table

      Table 2. Only the ablation analysis of parallax branches trained on Sceneflow dataset

      MethodEPE /pixelD1 /%
      ACV0.7182.55
      ACV+Sobel0.6272.23
      ACV+multi_fea_fusion0.6642.29
      ACV+Sobel+multi_fea_fusion(MS-ACV)0.6052.14
    • Table 3. The ablation analysis of the entire network trained on Sceneflow dataset

      View table

      Table 3. The ablation analysis of the entire network trained on Sceneflow dataset

      MethodEPE /pixelD1 /%
      ACV0.4841.60
      ACV+Sobel0.4721.53
      ACV+multi_fea_fusion0.4791.57
      ACV+Sobel+multi_fea_fusion(MS-ACV)0.4671.51
    • Table 4. Comparative analysis of the entire network trained on KITTI dataset

      View table

      Table 4. Comparative analysis of the entire network trained on KITTI dataset

      MethodKITTI12KITTI15
      2-Noc /%2-All /%3-Noc /%3-All /%EPE Noc /pixelEPE All /pixelD1-bg /%D1-fg /%D1-All /%
      GC-Net2.713.461.772.300.60.72.216.162.87
      PSMNet2.443.011.491.890.50.61.864.622.32
      EdgeStereo2.322.881.461.830.40.51.843.302.08
      GWCNet2.162.711.321.700.50.51.743.932.11
      ACVNet1.832.351.131.470.40.51.373.071.65
      MS-ACV1.752.301.111.440.40.51.323.081.61
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Lunming Qin, Bin Yu, Haoyang Cui, Houqin Bian, Xi Wang. Disparity Estimation Method Based on an Improved ACV Model[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2024, 61(24): 2415003

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category: Machine Vision

    Received: Mar. 6, 2024

    Accepted: Apr. 25, 2024

    Published Online: Dec. 19, 2024

    The Author Email:

    DOI:10.3788/LOP240835

    CSTR:32186.14.LOP240835

    Topics