Journals Articles Conferences News About CLP
Submit a paper Email Alert
Search
Search
Articles
Journals
News
Advanced Search
Top Searches
2D MaterialsTransformation opticsQuantum PhotonicsSmall lasersSemiconductor UV PhotonicsSupersymmetric microring laser arrays

Photonics Research, Volume. 13, Issue 5, 1365(2025)

Symmetric and asymmetric Hall effect-like splitting of optical Stokes skyrmions via a hybrid multi-zone filter

Tian Xia1, Jia Ma1, Zhenwei Xie1,2、*, and Xiaocong Yuan1,3、*
Author Affiliations
  • 1Nanophotonics Research Centre, Institute of Microscale Optoelectronics & State Key Laboratory of Radio Frequency Heterogeneous Integration, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China
  • 2e-mail: ayst31415926@szu.edu.cn
  • 3e-mail: xcyuan@szu.edu.cn
    • show less
    Full TextGet PDF
    Figures&Tables (11)
    Equations (14)
    References (40)
    Tools
    Paper Information
    Topics
    Figures & Tables(11)
    Design concept of the HESS.

    Fig. 1. Design concept of the HESS.

    Download full size
    View in Article
    Symmetric HESS. (a1)–(c1) Numerical distributions of S1, S2, and S3, respectively, for the left sections depicted in Figs. 5(a1)–5(f1). (d1) 3D vector field. (e1) 2D top view of the skyrmion. (a2)–(e2) Corresponding experimental results. (a3)–(e3) Numerical results for the right sections depicted in Figs. 5(a1)–5(f1). (a4)–(e4) Corresponding experimental results.

    Fig. 2. Symmetric HESS. (a1)–(c1) Numerical distributions of S1, S2, and S3, respectively, for the left sections depicted in Figs. 5(a1)–5(f1). (d1) 3D vector field. (e1) 2D top view of the skyrmion. (a2)–(e2) Corresponding experimental results. (a3)–(e3) Numerical results for the right sections depicted in Figs. 5(a1)–5(f1). (a4)–(e4) Corresponding experimental results.

    Download full size
    View in Article
    Asymmetric HESS. (a1)–(c1) Numerical distributions of S1, S2, and S3, respectively, for the left sections depicted in Figs. 6(a1)–6(f1). (d1) 3D vector field. (e1) 2D top view of the skyrmion. (a2)–(e2) Corresponding experimental results. (a3)–(e3) Numerical results for the right sections depicted in Figs. 6(a1)–6(f1). (a4)–(e4) Corresponding experimental results.

    Fig. 3. Asymmetric HESS. (a1)–(c1) Numerical distributions of S1, S2, and S3, respectively, for the left sections depicted in Figs. 6(a1)–6(f1). (d1) 3D vector field. (e1) 2D top view of the skyrmion. (a2)–(e2) Corresponding experimental results. (a3)–(e3) Numerical results for the right sections depicted in Figs. 6(a1)–6(f1). (a4)–(e4) Corresponding experimental results.

    Download full size
    View in Article
    Experimental arrangement of the HESS.

    Fig. 4. Experimental arrangement of the HESS.

    Download full size
    View in Article
    Symmetric splitting of intensity distributions. (a1)–(f1) Numerical and (a2)–(f2) captured profiles of the IXP, IYP, IL+45 P, IL-45 P, IRCP, and ILCP, respectively.

    Fig. 5. Symmetric splitting of intensity distributions. (a1)–(f1) Numerical and (a2)–(f2) captured profiles of the IXP, IYP, IL+45 P, IL-45 P, IRCP, and ILCP, respectively.

    Download full size
    View in Article
    Asymmetric splitting of intensity distributions. (a1)–(f1) Numerical and (a2)–(f2) captured profiles of the IXP, IYP, IL+45 P, IL-45 P, IRCP, and ILCP, respectively.

    Fig. 6. Asymmetric splitting of intensity distributions. (a1)–(f1) Numerical and (a2)–(f2) captured profiles of the IXP, IYP, IL+45 P, IL-45 P, IRCP, and ILCP, respectively.

    Download full size
    View in Article
    Magnified images of symmetric splitting in intensity distributions. (a1)–(f1) Numerical profiles of the left sections depicted in Figs. 5(a1)–5(f1), respectively. (a2)–(f2) Corresponding experimental results. (a3)–(f3) Numerical results for the right sections depicted in Figs. 5(a1)–5(f1). (a4)–(f4) Corresponding experimental results.

    Fig. 7. Magnified images of symmetric splitting in intensity distributions. (a1)–(f1) Numerical profiles of the left sections depicted in Figs. 5(a1)–5(f1), respectively. (a2)–(f2) Corresponding experimental results. (a3)–(f3) Numerical results for the right sections depicted in Figs. 5(a1)–5(f1). (a4)–(f4) Corresponding experimental results.

    Download full size
    View in Article
    Magnified images of asymmetric splitting in intensity distributions. (a1)–(f1) Numerical profiles of the left sections depicted in Figs. 6(a1)–6(f1), respectively. (a2)–(f2) Corresponding experimental results. (a3)–(f3) Numerical results for the right sections depicted in Figs. 6(a1)–6(f1). (a4)–(f4) Corresponding experimental results.

    Fig. 8. Magnified images of asymmetric splitting in intensity distributions. (a1)–(f1) Numerical profiles of the left sections depicted in Figs. 6(a1)–6(f1), respectively. (a2)–(f2) Corresponding experimental results. (a3)–(f3) Numerical results for the right sections depicted in Figs. 6(a1)–6(f1). (a4)–(f4) Corresponding experimental results.

    Download full size
    View in Article
    (a1)–(a4) and (b1)–(b4) Stokes vectors and polarization distribution of azimuthally polarized light with a topological charge of +1 and −1 after propagating 200 mm before splitting, respectively. (c1)–(c4) and (d1)–(d4) Stokes vectors and polarization distribution after symmetric and asymmetric splitting, respectively.

    Fig. 9. (a1)–(a4) and (b1)–(b4) Stokes vectors and polarization distribution of azimuthally polarized light with a topological charge of +1 and −1 after propagating 200 mm before splitting, respectively. (c1)–(c4) and (d1)–(d4) Stokes vectors and polarization distribution after symmetric and asymmetric splitting, respectively.

    Download full size
    View in Article
    (a)–(d) Polarization ellipses distribution calculated based on the Stokes parameters in Figs. 2(a1)–2(c1), 2(a2)–2(c2), 2(a3)–2(c3), and 2(a4)–2(c4), respectively.

    Fig. 10. (a)–(d) Polarization ellipses distribution calculated based on the Stokes parameters in Figs. 2(a1)–2(c1), 2(a2)–2(c2), 2(a3)–2(c3), and 2(a4)–2(c4), respectively.

    Download full size
    View in Article
    (a)–(d) Polarization ellipses distribution calculated based on the Stokes parameters in Figs. 3(a1)–3(c1), 3(a2)–3(c2), 3(a3)–3(c3), and 3(a4)–3(c4), respectively.

    Fig. 11. (a)–(d) Polarization ellipses distribution calculated based on the Stokes parameters in Figs. 3(a1)–3(c1), 3(a2)–3(c2), 3(a3)–3(c3), and 3(a4)–3(c4), respectively.

    Download full size
    View in Article
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Tian Xia, Jia Ma, Zhenwei Xie, Xiaocong Yuan, "Symmetric and asymmetric Hall effect-like splitting of optical Stokes skyrmions via a hybrid multi-zone filter," Photonics Res. 13, 1365 (2025)

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Set citation alerts for article
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category: Physical Optics

    Received: Sep. 10, 2024

    Accepted: Nov. 13, 2024

    Published Online: Apr. 30, 2025

    The Author Email: Zhenwei Xie (ayst31415926@szu.edu.cn), Xiaocong Yuan (xcyuan@szu.edu.cn)

    DOI:10.1364/PRJ.541783

    CSTR:32188.14.PRJ.541783

    Topics

    laser devices and laser physics
    Lasers and Laser Optics
    Laser physics
    laser manufacturing
    Instrumentation, Measurement and Metrology