Chinese Journal of Lasers, Volume. 51, Issue 11, 1101016(2024)

Development of Airborne LiDAR Bathymetric Technology and Application

Yan He1,2,3、*, Bangyi Tao4, Jiayong Yu5, Guangxiu Xu6, and Yifan Huang1,2,3
Author Affiliations
  • 1Shanghai Institute of Optics and Fine Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201800, China
  • 2Laboratory of Space Laser Information Transmission and Detection Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201800, China
  • 3Center of Materials Science and Optoelectronics Engineering, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
  • 4The Second Institute of Oceanography, Ministry of Natural Resources, Hangzhou 310012, Zhejiang , China
  • 5Anhui Jianzhu University, Hefei 230601, Anhui , China
  • 6Naval Research Institute, Tianjin 300061, China
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(39)
    Schematic diagram of airborne laser bathymetric system[1]
    Flow chart of airborne laser bathymetric system[1]
    Schematic diagram of scanning receiving field of view and photo of CZMIL SuperNova
    Scan pattern diagram and photo of HawkEye-5
    Detection pattern and model diagram of RAMMS[13]
    Diagram of Mapper5000 model and sea-land topographic elevation model of Chilianyu island
    iGreena photo and echo signals of different targets in coastal zone[22]
    Photo of Mapper4000U mounted on drone and profile of measured 3D point clouds[26]
    Flowchart of classification algorithm[28]
    Characteristic of infrared laser waveform[32]
    Results of land and sea waveform classification[20]
    Classification results of different sea-land waveform classification methods [38]
    Comparison of underwater topography before and after treatment[48]
    Distribution of depth deviation before and after correction[56]
    Distribution of depth deviation before and after correction[60]
    Results of sea surface extraction[66]
    Point cloud distribution and probability density function of Weihai bay and Ganquan island before and after correction for difference in slant distance[68]
    System block diagram and airborne flight results of Microaltimeter[89]
    Airborne flight measurements of Leafcutter[91]
    Underwater topographic data acquired by CATS[92]
    Underwater echoes of shallow sea obtained by HRQLS-1 system[91]
    Acquisition of shallow underwater echoes by MABEL system[95]
    Photon distribution of underwater echoes in northwest Australia obtained by ICESat-2[96]
    Photon distribution of underwater echoes in Qiandao lake obtained by photon-counting laser bathymetric system[98]
    Multi-wavelength echo signals of water with different turbidities[99]. (a) Relative clear; (b) relative turbid
    Oculus system model and measurement of dual-wavelength echo waveform of water body[100]
    Block diagram of dual-wavelength ocean LiDAR system[101]
    Signal to noise ratio of dual-wavelength echo signal obtained in different regions varies with depth[101]
    Schematic of multi-wavelength polarimetric LiDAR system[102]
    Vertical profile distribution of subsurface phytoplankton layer in coastal water along LiDAR flight track[102]
    Spectral detection experiments of different ores underwater[103]
    Elevation rendering of sea and land[76]
    Wave propagation process[109]
    Surface elevation map of broken wave[110]
    Vertical distribution of water optical parameters and mass concentration of chlorophyll a[115]
    Classification results of LiDAR substrate[116]
    • Table 1. Main technical indexes of representative airborne LiDAR bathymetric systems

      View table

      Table 1. Main technical indexes of representative airborne LiDAR bathymetric systems

      Technical indexAirborne LiDAR bathymetric systems
      HawkEye-5CZMIL SuperNovaRAMMSMapper-10K
      Laser wavelength515 nm and 1064 nm532 nm and 1064 nm532 nm532 nm and 1064 nm
      Shallow channel measurement rate200 kHz210 kHz
      Shallow channel maximum depth

      3.2/Kd (substrate

      reflectance ≥15%)

      2.9/Kd (substrate

      reflectance ≥15%)

      Shallow channel depth accuracy

      0.252+0.0075z2 m

      (reliability of 95%)

      0.252+0.0075z2

      (reliability of 95%)

      0.252+0.0075z2

      (reliability of 95%)

      Shallow channel

      horizontal accuracy

      IHO special order

      (0.40+0.075z) m

      (reliability of 95%)

      IHO special order

      Deep channel

      measurement rate

      40 kHz30 kHz25 kHz10 kHz

      Deep channel

      maximum depth

      4/Kd (substrate

      reflectance ≥15%)

      4.4/Kd (substrate

      reflectance ≥15%)

      4/Kd

      4.5/Kd (substrate

      reflectance ≥15%)

      Deep channel

      depth accuracy

      0.32+0.013z2 m

      (reliability of 95%)

      0.32+0.013z2 m

      (reliability of 95%)

      0.52+0.013z2 m

      (reliability of 95%)

      0.32+0.013z2 m

      (reliability of 95%)

      Deep channel horizontal accuracy

      (2.0+0.075z) m

      (reliability of 95%)

      (2.0+0.075z) m

      (reliability of 95%)

      IHO order 1IHO order 1
      Scanning angle

      ±14° (front/back) and

      ±20° (left/right), 0.72 times

      flight altitude (elliptical scanning)

      0.72 times flight altitude

      (circular scanning and angle

      between laser beam and

      vertical line is ±20°)

      Flight altitude

      0.53 times flight

      altitude (elliptical

      scanning)

      Point density @height of 400 m and speed of

      200 km/h

      2.5 point/m2 (deep channel),

      12.5 point/m2 (shallow channel),

      and 31.3 points/m2 (land)

      1.9 point/m2 (deep

      channel), 13.1 point/m2

      (shallow channel), and

      15.0 point/m2 (land)

      1.1 point/m20.8 point/m2
      Dimension

      480 mm×510 mm×640 mm

      (shallow and land sensor heads),

      435 mm×435 mm×600 mm (deep

      sensor head), 560 mm×540 mm×580 mm (shallow channel controller), and 560 mm×540 mm×

      580 mm (deep channel cooler)

      890 mm×600 mm×900 mm

      (sensor head) and

      590 mm×565 mm×1060 mm

      (control desk)

      610 mm×410 mm×

      446 mm (sensor

      head) and 380 mm×

      340 mm × 265 mm

      (water cooler)

      Weight218 kg270 kg14 kg100 kg
      Power consumption2800 W2380 W280 W1500 W
    • Table 2. Main technical indexes of unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)-borne LiDAR bathymetric systems

      View table

      Table 2. Main technical indexes of unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)-borne LiDAR bathymetric systems

      Technical

      index

      UAV-borne LiDAR bathymetric systems
      EdgeTDOT3VQ-840-GPhoton counting LiDARMapper-20kU
      Laser wavelength532 nm532 nm

      532 nm and

      near-infrared

      532 nm

      532 nm and

      1064 nm

      Measurement

      rate

      20 kHz60 kHz50‒200 kHz500 kHz20 kHz

      Maximum

      depth

      1.5 Secchi

      depth

      1.4 Secchi depth (reflectance

      of 1.0, absorption coefficient

      of 0.25), 1.25 times depth

      of Secchi disk (reflectance of

      0.5, absorption coefficient of

      0.25), and 1 times Secchi disk

      (reflectance of 0.2, absorption

      coefficient of 0.25)

      1.7, 1.8, 2.0, 2.2, and

      2.5 Secchi depth (measurement rate

      of 200, 100, 50, 5, and

      0.5 kHz, respectively)

      2 Secchi

      depth

      1.5 Secchi

      depth

      Flying altitude

      20 m (marine

      surveying

      and mapping)

      5‒150 m5‒150 m

      Scanning

      angle

      ±15° (line

      scanning)

      ±45°(line scanning)±20° (ellipse scanning)

      ±15°

      (circle

      scanning)

      ±20°

      (ellipse

      scanning)

      Point density

      @height of

      20 m and speed

      of 10 m/s

      200 point/m2150 point/m2

      687 point/m2 @

      measurement rate

      of 100 kHz

      200 point/m2137 point/m2

      Power

      consumption

      110 W75 W
      Dimension

      235 mm×

      184 mm×

      148 mm

      270 mm×230 mm×150 mm

      360 mm×285 mm×

      200 mm

      230 mm×

      170 mm×

      205 mm

      270 mm×

      188 mm×

      154 mm

      Weight5 kg2.7 kg12 kg5 kg6 kg
    • Table 3. Comparison of classification results of different wavelengths[103]

      View table

      Table 3. Comparison of classification results of different wavelengths[103]

      ParameterWavelength of MSL
      490 nm530 nm490 nm and 530 nm460‒560 nm
      Accuracy /%58.570.380.698.4
      Kappa coefficient0.5260.6610.7790.982
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Yan He, Bangyi Tao, Jiayong Yu, Guangxiu Xu, Yifan Huang. Development of Airborne LiDAR Bathymetric Technology and Application[J]. Chinese Journal of Lasers, 2024, 51(11): 1101016

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category: laser devices and laser physics

    Received: Jan. 2, 2024

    Accepted: Apr. 30, 2024

    Published Online: Jun. 3, 2024

    The Author Email: He Yan (heyan@siom.ac.cn)

    DOI:10.3788/CJL240437

    CSTR:32183.14.CJL240437

    Topics