Extended Cumulative Structural Feature Matching Method for Multimodal Remote Sensing Images

Xunwei Xie

doi:10.3788/LOP230915

Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, Volume. 61, Issue 4, 0428002(2024)

Extended Cumulative Structural Feature Matching Method for Multimodal Remote Sensing Images

Xunwei Xie^*

Key Laboratory of Avionic Information System Technology, 10th Research Institute of China Electronics Technology Group Corporation, Chengdu 610036, Sichaun, China

show less

Abstract Get PDF(in Chinese)

Figures & Tables(9)

Fig. 1. Flowchart of the proposed method

Download full size

Fig. 2. Comparison of the detailed structure of $F_{C S}$ with different scales. (a) Original image; (b) $F_{C S}$ with small scale 1; (c) $F_{C S}$ with small scale 2; (d) $F_{C S}$ with middle scale; (e) $F_{C S}$ with large scale; (f) $F_{C S}$ with multiple scales

Download full size

Fig. 3. Partial experimental data. (a) Optical-optical; (b) infrared-optical; (c) map-optical; (d) depth-optical; (e) SAR-optical; (f) day-night

Download full size

Fig. 4. Visualization of matching effects of different methods on image pairs shown in Fig. 3. (a) Optical-optical; (b) infrared-optical; (c) map-optical; (d) depth-optical; (e) SAR-optical; (f) day-night

Download full size

Table 1. Comparison of average number of correct matching and ratio of correct matching

View table

Table 1. Comparison of average number of correct matching and ratio of correct matching

	Average number of correct matching							Average ratio of correct matching /%
Method	（a）	（b）	（c）	（d）	（e）	（f）	total	（a）	（b）	（c）	（d）	（e）	（f）	total
LHOPC	177.6	44.9	51.5	109.1	23.3	42.6	74.9	17.6	8.6	9.7	9.6	5.2	4.8	9.3
RIFT	195.8	70.3	74.7	95.1	82.7	37.1	92.6	17.6	8.6	10.1	6.5	7.1	2.6	8.8
HAPCG	35.3	73.7	44.3	30.4	27.3	18.4	38.2	22.5	42.2	25.1	22.8	16.4	12.7	23.6
CSF	243.5	49.0	68.2	120.0	59.0	76.7	102.7	25.3	12.6	9.9	10.3	10.8	8.1	12.8
ECSF	222.0	70.9	60.9	111.3	59.0	44.4	94.8	41.5	17.0	16.8	16.3	13.0	11.5	19.4

Table 2. Comparison of number of success matching cases and average success ratio of matching

View table

Table 2. Comparison of number of success matching cases and average success ratio of matching

	Number of the success cases							Average ratio of correct matching /%
Method	（a）	（b）	（c）	（d）	（e）	（f）	total	（a）	（b）	（c）	（d）	（e）	（f）	total
LHOPC	10	10	10	7	10	8	55	100	100	100	70	100	80	91.7
RIFT	10	9	10	9	10	10	58	100	90	100	90	100	100	96.7
HAPCG	10	10	9	9	10	8	56	100	100	90	90	100	80	93.3
CSF	10	10	10	8	10	9	57	100	100	100	80	100	90	95
ECSF	10	10	10	7	10	8	55	100	100	100	70	100	80	91.7

Table 3. Comparison of mean of root mean square residuals of correct matching
View table
Table 3. Comparison of mean of root mean square residuals of correct matching
LHOPC RIFT HAPCG CSF ECSF
1.679 1.899 1.876 1.783 1.771

Table 4. Comparison of average running time
View table
Table 4. Comparison of average running time
LHOPC RIFT HAPCG CSF ECSF
6.53 26.14 5.99 6.29 7.23

Table 5. Comparative experimental results on the effectiveness of extended strategies

View table

Table 5. Comparative experimental results on the effectiveness of extended strategies

Strategy	Average number of total matching	Average number of correct matching	Average ratio of correct matching /%
CSF	679.9	102.7	12.8
ECSF（strategy 1）	630.9	88.2	11.9
ECSF（strategy 1，2）	628.2	104.2	14.5
ECSF（strategy 1，2，3）	410.0	94.8	19.4
ECSF（strategy 2，3）	418.3	101.5	20.6

Tools

Get Citation

Copy Citation Text

Xunwei Xie. Extended Cumulative Structural Feature Matching Method for Multimodal Remote Sensing Images[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2024, 61(4): 0428002

Download Citation

EndNote(RIS)BibTex Plain Text

Set citation alerts for article

Save article for my favorites

Paper Information

Category: Remote Sensing and Sensors

Received: Mar. 22, 2023

Accepted: May. 29, 2023

Published Online: Feb. 26, 2024

The Author Email: Xunwei Xie (564471234@qq.com)

DOI:10.3788/LOP230915

CSTR:32186.14.LOP230915

Topics

laser devices and laser physics

Lasers and Laser Optics

Laser physics

laser manufacturing

Instrumentation, Measurement and Metrology

Table 1. Comparison of average number of correct matching and ratio of correct matching

Table 1. Comparison of average number of correct matching and ratio of correct matching

Table 2. Comparison of number of success matching cases and average success ratio of matching

Table 2. Comparison of number of success matching cases and average success ratio of matching

Table 3. Comparison of mean of root mean square residuals of correct matching

Table 3. Comparison of mean of root mean square residuals of correct matching

Table 4. Comparison of average running time

Table 4. Comparison of average running time

Table 5. Comparative experimental results on the effectiveness of extended strategies

Table 5. Comparative experimental results on the effectiveness of extended strategies