4D Block-Matching Polarization Image Denoising Algorithm Based on Polarization Constraints

Changji Dong; Hedong Liu; Xiaobo Li; Zhenzhou Cheng; Tiegen Liu; Jingsheng Zhai; Ruitao Zhang; Haofeng Hu

doi:10.3788/LOP232642

Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, Volume. 61, Issue 16, 1611017(2024)

4D Block-Matching Polarization Image Denoising Algorithm Based on Polarization Constraints

Changji Dong¹, Hedong Liu^2、*, Xiaobo Li³, Zhenzhou Cheng³, Tiegen Liu², Jingsheng Zhai³, Ruitao Zhang⁴, and Haofeng Hu^2,3、**

Author Affiliations

¹Joint Research Centre for Industrialization of Marine Economic Technology, School of Marine Science and Technology, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China

²School of Precision Instrument and Opto-Electronics Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China

³School of Marine Science and Technology, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China

⁴Deepinfar Ocean Technology Incorporated, Tianjin 300072, China

show less

Abstract Get PDF(in Chinese)

Figures & Tables(9)

Fig. 1. Flow chart of polarization constrained 4D block-matching polarization image denoising algorithm

Download full size

Fig. 2. Schematic diagrams of polarization image acquisition algorithm. (a) DoFP polarization imager and micro-polarizer array; (b) schematic diagram of acquisition device

Download full size

Fig. 3. Polarimetric image denoising results. (a) Metal coin; (b) plastic doll

Download full size

Fig. 4. PSNR under different noise standard deviations. (a) $S_{0}$ image; (b) DoLP image; (c) AoP image

Download full size

Fig. 5. Denoising performance on real noisy image with different parameters $(L_{1}, L_{2})$

Download full size

Table 1. Average PSNR of different algorithms in terms of $S_{0}$ , DoLP, and AoP
View table
Table 1. Average PSNR of different algorithms in terms of $S_{0}$ , DoLP, and AoP
Algorithm S₀ DoLP AoP
Input 31.27 18.80 11.41
Mean 34.50 29.77 15.81
Median 34.16 29.13 15.34
Wavelet 35.21 28.82 16.07
KSVD 35.65 30.01 15.98
BM3D 37.00 32.17 17.28
Proposed algorithm 40.17 33.74 18.04

Table 2. Average SSIM of different algorithms in terms of $S_{0}$ , DoLP, and AoP
View table
Table 2. Average SSIM of different algorithms in terms of $S_{0}$ , DoLP, and AoP
Algorithm S₀ DoLP AoP
Input 0.706 0.479 0.187
Mean 0.897 0.824 0.228
Median 0.893 0.844 0.202
Wavelet 0.901 0.850 0.245
KSVD 0.943 0.898 0.373
BM3D 0.982 0.929 0.416
Proposed algorithm 0.993 0.951 0.459

Table 3. PSNR/SSIM performances and execution times of PBM4D with different $L_{1}$
View table
Table 3. PSNR/SSIM performances and execution times of PBM4D with different $L_{1}$
Indicator 8 16 32 64
PSNR /dB 25.4 26.5 27.7 27.8
SSIM 0.39 0.50 0.74 0.75
Time /s 7 14 63 420

Table 4. PSNR/SSIM performances and execution times of PBM4D with different $L_{2}$
View table
Table 4. PSNR/SSIM performances and execution times of PBM4D with different $L_{2}$
Indicator 8 16 32
PSNR /dB 27.7 27.8 27.8
SSIM 0.74 0.76 0.77
Time /s 63 109 419

Tools

Get Citation

Copy Citation Text

Changji Dong, Hedong Liu, Xiaobo Li, Zhenzhou Cheng, Tiegen Liu, Jingsheng Zhai, Ruitao Zhang, Haofeng Hu. 4D Block-Matching Polarization Image Denoising Algorithm Based on Polarization Constraints[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2024, 61(16): 1611017

Download Citation

EndNote(RIS)BibTex Plain Text

Set citation alerts for article

Save article for my favorites

Paper Information

Category: Imaging Systems

Received: Dec. 11, 2023

Accepted: Mar. 12, 2024

Published Online: Aug. 8, 2024

The Author Email: Hedong Liu (herb@tju.edu.cn), Haofeng Hu (haofeng_hu@tju.edu.cn)

DOI:10.3788/LOP232642

CSTR:32186.14.LOP232642

Topics

laser devices and laser physics

Lasers and Laser Optics

Laser physics

laser manufacturing

Instrumentation, Measurement and Metrology

Table 1. Average PSNR of different algorithms in terms of S0, DoLP, and AoP

Table 1. Average PSNR of different algorithms in terms of S0, DoLP, and AoP

Table 2. Average SSIM of different algorithms in terms of S0, DoLP, and AoP

Table 2. Average SSIM of different algorithms in terms of S0, DoLP, and AoP

Table 3. PSNR/SSIM performances and execution times of PBM4D with different L1

Table 3. PSNR/SSIM performances and execution times of PBM4D with different L1

Table 4. PSNR/SSIM performances and execution times of PBM4D with different L2

Table 4. PSNR/SSIM performances and execution times of PBM4D with different L2

Table 1. Average PSNR of different algorithms in terms of $S_{0}$ , DoLP, and AoP

Table 1. Average PSNR of different algorithms in terms of $S_{0}$ , DoLP, and AoP

Table 2. Average SSIM of different algorithms in terms of $S_{0}$ , DoLP, and AoP

Table 2. Average SSIM of different algorithms in terms of $S_{0}$ , DoLP, and AoP

Table 3. PSNR/SSIM performances and execution times of PBM4D with different $L_{1}$

Table 3. PSNR/SSIM performances and execution times of PBM4D with different $L_{1}$

Table 4. PSNR/SSIM performances and execution times of PBM4D with different $L_{2}$

Table 4. PSNR/SSIM performances and execution times of PBM4D with different $L_{2}$