Acta Physica Sinica, Volume. 69, Issue 4, 040505-1(2020)

Structure, magnetic and transport properties of Fe3O4 near verwey transition

Xiang Liu and Wen-Bo Mi*
Author Affiliations
  • Tianjin Key Laboratory of Low Dimensional Materials Physics and Preparation Technology, School of Science, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300354, China
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(25)
    Temperature-dependent resistivity of Fe3O4 sample I with FeO∶Fe2O3 = 1∶1.025 and sample II with FeO∶Fe2O3 = 1∶1.08[1].
    Spinel unit cell: (a) Stacking pattern of sub-lattices; (b) crystal structure[24].
    Relationship between the unit cells referred to the structure with space group , P2/m, P2/c and Cc[35].
    Schematic diagram of (a) trimeron and (b) distribution of trimeron[23].
    TEM results of ((a)−(d)) Fe3O4(001) and ((e)−(h)) Fe3O4(111) films. White Miller index above (below) TV are marked with cubic (monoclinic) Fe3O4. Yellow Miller index in Fig. (g) indicates Al2O3. Brown and red spheres in Fig. (b) and Fig. (f) represent Fe and O[41,43].
    {110} APB defects in Fe3O4: (a) The ideal cubic Fe3O4 structure; (b) APB-I; (c) APB-II. The APB crystal translations are indicated by green vectors. Red, blue and gray spheres represent the oxygen atoms, tetrahedral Fe and octahedral Fe atoms[48].
    Symmetrically distinct crystallographic relationships between cubic and monoclinic phases of magnetite[49].
    (a) STM image of Fe3O4(100) surface at 78 K; (b) profile along the line marked in red of (a); (c) the monoclinic unit cell of Fe3O4; (d) two mirrored monoclinic cells with opposite monoclinic c axis at a twin boundary[51].
    Spin-polarized DOS of Fe3O4 twin boundaries (TBs): (a) Type I TB; (b) Type II TB; (c) Type III TB. EF is represented by the red dashed lines. The relaxed atomistic models are also given for reference. The DOS suggest that the magnetic coupling across the type I TB is ferromagnetic and those across the type II and III TBs are antiferromagnetic[52].
    Sketch map of the electronic ground state of Fe 3d electrons and magnetic couplings in Fe3O4[53].
    Temperature dependent Anisotropy constant K1 of Fe3O4[27].
    Models for electron localization on FeB sites of Fe3O4: (a) Verwey’s tetragonal model of Fe2+/Fe3+ charge order; (b) an Anderson tetrahedron of two Fe2+ and two Fe3+ ions; (c) bond-dimerization in the FeB4 tetrahedron, where the electrons are localized in two shortened FeB-FeB distances, shown as bold lines[53].
    DOS of Fe3O4 with the monoclinic structure projected onto the FeBd orbitals. Fermi level EF is set at 0 eV[54].
    Isovalue of the confidence factor. The best agreement is obtained for δ12 = 0.12 ± 0.025 electrons and δ34 = 0.10 ± 0.06 electrons, where the charge occupancies of Fe1 and Fe4 are 5.38, 5.62 and 5.40, 5.60, respectively[63].
    Temperature dependent resistivity of 150 and 660-nm thick Fe3O4 films in the temperature range of 60–350 K. The temperature dependent magnetization of 660-nm thick film at a magnetic field of 300 Oe[71].
    Magnetoresistance of 660 nm thick Fe3O4 films at (a) 70 K and (b) 115 K; (c) Temperature dependent magnetoresistance of 660-nm thick Fe3O4 film at the magnetic fields of 0.5, 1, 2, 4 T. The dotted lines are simulations using Mott’s formula[71].
    Temperature dependent (a) magnetization and (b) zero-field resistivity of Fe3O4 single crystal and films with the thickness of 200, 50 and 15 nm[73].
    Spin orientation of two ferromagnetic chains with antiferromagnetic coupling at an atomically sharp boundary at a magnetic field[77].
    AMR of the (a) 67 nm thick Fe3O4 film and (b) Fe3O4 single crystal at a magnetic field of 5 T[81].
    AMR of the epitaxial Fe3O4(100) film: (a) Temperature-dependent AMR at a 50 kOe magnetic field; AMR at (b) 110 K and (c) 80 K[85].
    (a) Schematic of the measurements; (b) relation between AMR and distribution of in-plane trimeron of Fe3O4(100) film at 80 K and 50 kOe; (c) relation between AMR and distribution of in-plane trimeron of Fe3O4(111) film at 110 K and 10 kOe. The trimeron is shown in the upper right corner[85].
    (a) Dielectric hysteresis loop of Pd/Fe3O4/Nd:SrTiO3 heterostructure[92]; (b) ionic structure of Fe octahedral sites with P2/c (left) and Cc (right) space groups. Orange and blue balls represent the Fe2+ and Fe3+ ions. Electric dipole moments caused by charge shifts are indicated by red arrows[93].
    (a) Ferroelectric polarization along the x and z axes; (b) strain dependent total energy[94].
    • Table 1.

      Magnetic exchange interaction across APBs in the epitaxial Fe3O4(001) films[46].

      外延Fe3O4(001)薄膜中APB处的磁交换相互作用[46]

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 1.

      Magnetic exchange interaction across APBs in the epitaxial Fe3O4(001) films[46].

      外延Fe3O4(001)薄膜中APB处的磁交换相互作用[46]

      交换相互作用类型和角度磁性和强度出现位置
      FeB-O-FeB超交换, 180°反铁磁, 强APB处
      FeA-O-FeA超交换, 约140°反铁磁, 强APB处
      FeB-O-FeA超交换, 约120°反铁磁, 强块体和APB处
      FeB-O-FeB超交换, 90°铁磁, 弱块体和APB处
      FeA-O-FeA超交换, 约70°反铁磁, 弱APB处
      FeB-FeB直接铁磁, 弱块体和APB处
      FeA-FeA直接反铁磁, 弱APB处
      FeB-FeA直接铁磁, 弱APB处
    • Table 2. Calculated charge separations (CS), orbital ordering (OO) and the total energy (Et) of Fe3O4 with unit cell in monoclinic P2/c and cubic phase[36].

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 2. Calculated charge separations (CS), orbital ordering (OO) and the total energy (Et) of Fe3O4 with unit cell in monoclinic P2/c and cubic phase[36].

      U/eV P2/c$Fd\overline 3 m$
      ↓gap/eVCS/eOO(P) Et/eV·(f.u.)–1↓gap/eVCS/eOO(P) Et/eV·(f.u.)–1
      0.0No0.00No(0.55)–0.15No0.00No(0.34)0.00
      4.0No0.11Yes(0.98)–0.15No0.10Yes(0.96)–0.22
      4.50.20.15Yes(0.98)–0.53No0.12Yes(0.96)–0.27
      5.00.420.17Yes(0.97)–0.750.110.16Yes(0.96)–0.35
      5.50.630.19Yes(0.96)–0.850.280.19Yes(0.91)–0.47
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Xiang Liu, Wen-Bo Mi. Structure, magnetic and transport properties of Fe3O4 near verwey transition [J]. Acta Physica Sinica, 2020, 69(4): 040505-1

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Received: Nov. 19, 2019

    Accepted: --

    Published Online: Nov. 17, 2020

    The Author Email:

    DOI:10.7498/aps.69.20191763

    Topics