Photonics Research, Volume. 12, Issue 9, 1937(2024)

Phase space framework enables a variable-scale diffraction model for coherent imaging and display

Zhi Li1,2, Xuhao Luo3, Jing Wang2, Xin Yuan4, Dongdong Teng1,5、*, Qiang Song2,6、*, and Huigao Duan2,7、*
Author Affiliations
  • 1School of Physics, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China
  • 2Greater Bay Area Institute for Innovation, Hunan University, Guangzhou 511300, China
  • 3School of Physics Science and Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
  • 4School of Engineering, Westlake University, Hangzhou 310030, China
  • 5e-mail: tengdd@mail.sysu.edu.cn
  • 6e-mail: songqiangshanghai@foxmail.com
  • 7e-mail: duanhg@hnu.edu.cn
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(15)
    Modulation process of the SFTM and demonstration of variable-scale holography. (a) Schematic diagram of the transformation process of the SFTM in phase space for m>1. A typical PSD with a spatial extent Lo and a bandwidth Bo is sheared in the f-direction through chirp modulation and then undergoes coordinate transposition through simple Fourier transform. The PSD performs an inverse Fourier transform after shearing again and then magnifies it with a magnifier. After the last chirp modulation, the PSD becomes the Fresnel form of its original state. (b) Demonstration of full-color holography without pre-processing using SFTM based CGHs.
    (a) Allowed m-z space of the SFTM for λ=0.532 μm, N0=N/2=1000, and δxo=8 μm. The solid dots represent the data set used for the monochromatic CGH experiment. Plots (b) and (c) show the comparisons of y=0 slices of the analytic and SFTM based numerical results at z=200 mm and z=800 mm, respectively.
    Experimental results of SFTM algorithms under various circumstances. Comparison of the SFTM to (a) ASM and (b) SFT illustrates that within a considerable diffraction distance, the SFTM has almost the same effect within the applicable range of ASM and SFT. (c) The scaling ability of the SFTM is presented under different m and z. All m–z values have been marked with orange solid dots in Fig. 2(a). (d) Implementation of the SFTM’s long-distance and extreme magnification capability by projecting a 20× shark towards a distance of 1800 mm.
    Comparison of SFT (Fraunhofer) and the SFTM in full-color holography. (a) Chromatic aberration comparison using the SFT (Fraunhofer) based algorithm and SFTM based algorithm under vertical illumination in diffractive optical elements. (b) and (c) present the numerical reconstruction results for the two methods, while (c) and (e) are the respective optical reconstruction results.
    Implementation of variable-scale tomography. (a) Schematic of the SFTM based tomographic. The pixel sizes on three different image planes at different depths can be manipulated by SFTM algorithms as the SBP is conserved. (b) Three tomography images of 3×, 6×, and 10× pentagrams at depths of z=200 mm, 400 mm, and 700 mm were projected, respectively. (c), (d) The results of the two-layer full-color tomography experiment. The 1.5× rainbow flower locates at z=150 mm, and the 2.0× cube locates at z=300 mm.
    Full-color SFTM based metasurface holography design. (a) Schematic of full-color metasurface holography. (b) A TiO2 meta-atom with three independent tunable structure parameters D1, D2,θ. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of the TiO2 holographic metasurface in (c) oblique-view and (d) top-view are presented. (e) Simulation and (f) experiment results for letters “H,” “N,” and “U.”
    Schematic diagram of the PSD transformation process for the (a) ASM, (b) SFT, and (c) PSF convolution method in phase space.
    The constraint relationship between m and z in cases (a) λ=0.450 μm, (b) λ=0.532 μm, and (c) λ=0.633 μm, respectively.
    Flowchart of the three-stage IFTA.
    Algorithm flowchart of three-plane tomography.
    (a) Algorithm flowchart of full-color metasurface holography. The (b) phase shift and (c) transmittance of the green light obtained by sweep operations are shown.
    Experimental setup with SLM.
    Experimental setup for metasurface holography.
    • Table 1. Comparison of Our Model against the Canon Methods

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 1. Comparison of Our Model against the Canon Methods

      ModelOriginFast Inverse AlgorithmWorking DistancePre-processingScaling Factor
      RSIWave opticsNoArbitraryNot needed1
      ASMWave opticsYesNear fieldNot needed1
      SFTWave opticsYesFar fieldRequiredProportion of λz
      FMWave opticsYesUltra-far fieldRequiredProportion of λz
      Our modelPhase space opticsYesArbitraryNot neededVariable
    • Table 2. Sampling CSTs for the SFTM

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 2. Sampling CSTs for the SFTM

      CSTExpression
      CST 1m1+λz/Lo(δxo)2(λ/2)2
      CST 2m1λz/Lo(δxo)2(λ/2)2
      CST 31λz/(δxo)2N0m1+λz/(δxo)2N0
      CST 4{mλz/(δxo)2N,SFSRmλz/(δxo)2N,SSR
      CST 5{1/m1λz/(δxo)2N,m1m1/1+λz/(δxo)2N,0<m1
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Zhi Li, Xuhao Luo, Jing Wang, Xin Yuan, Dongdong Teng, Qiang Song, Huigao Duan, "Phase space framework enables a variable-scale diffraction model for coherent imaging and display," Photonics Res. 12, 1937 (2024)

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category: Holography, Gratings, and Diffraction

    Received: Mar. 15, 2024

    Accepted: Jul. 8, 2024

    Published Online: Aug. 28, 2024

    The Author Email: Dongdong Teng (tengdd@mail.sysu.edu.cn), Qiang Song (songqiangshanghai@foxmail.com), Huigao Duan (duanhg@hnu.edu.cn)

    DOI:10.1364/PRJ.523568

    Topics