Chinese Journal of Lasers, Volume. 52, Issue 17, 1704001(2025)
Accurate Camera Pose Estimation for Model Scale Scaling Interference
Fig. 2. Pose errors in the synthetic data experiments. (a)‒(d) Rotation matrix error at different noise standard deviations;
Fig. 3. Errors in pose and scaling factors under noise standard deviation σ=5 pixel. (a) Rotation matrix error; (b) translation vector error; (c) error in scaling factor s1; (d) error in scaling factor s2
Fig. 4. Qualitative results of some data on the KeypointNet dataset. (a) 3D point cloud of a bottle after scaling; (d) 3D point cloud of a car after scaling; (b)(e) visualized qualitative results of our method; (c)(f) visualized qualitative results of APnP method
Fig. 5. Four images from the ETH3D Benchmark dataset, where the first two are outdoor scenes and the last two are indoor scenes
Fig. 6. Comparison of pose errors and CPU running time in real data experiments. (a)‒(d) Rotation matrix error under actual scenarios of Courtyard, Facade, Delivery area, and Statue; (e)‒(h) translation vector error under actual scenarios of Courtyard, Facade, Delivery area, and Statue; (i)‒(l) CPU running time under actual scenarios of Courtyard, Facade, Delivery area, and Statue
Fig. 7. Histograms of pose errors of each method under extreme scaling factors. (a) Rotation matrix error under the actual scenario Courtyard; (b) rotation matrix error under the actual scenario Delivery area; (c) translation vector error under the actual scenario Courtyard; (d) translation vector error under the actual scenario Delivery area
|
|
|
|
|
Get Citation
Copy Citation Text
Xiaoyan Zhou, Futao Lu, Qida Yu, Bo Ni, Guili Xu. Accurate Camera Pose Estimation for Model Scale Scaling Interference[J]. Chinese Journal of Lasers, 2025, 52(17): 1704001
Category: Measurement and metrology
Received: Feb. 24, 2025
Accepted: Apr. 24, 2025
Published Online: Sep. 17, 2025
The Author Email: Qida Yu (003550@nuist.edu.cn)
CSTR:32183.14.CJL250554