Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis, Volume. 34, Issue 4, 1075(2014)
Comparison of Performances in Retrieving Impervious Surface between Hyperspectral (Hyperion) and Multispectral (TM/ETM+) Images
[1] [1] Ridd M K. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 1995, 16(12): 2165.
[2] [2] Wu C, Murray A T. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2003, 84: 493.
[3] [3] Yang F, Matsushita B, Fukushima T. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 2010, 65(7): 479.
[4] [4] Lu D, Moran E, Hetrick S. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 2011, 66(7): 298.
[8] [8] NASA. Landsat 7 Science Data Users Handbook [2012-08-05]. http://landsathandbook.gsfc.nasa.gov.
[10] [10] Chavez P S, jr. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 1996, 62 (9): 1025.
[11] [11] Weng Q, Hu X, Lu D. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 2008, 29(11): 3209.
[13] [13] Pu R, Bell S, Meyer C, et al. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 2012, 115: 234.
Get Citation
Copy Citation Text
TANG Fei, XU Han-qiu. Comparison of Performances in Retrieving Impervious Surface between Hyperspectral (Hyperion) and Multispectral (TM/ETM+) Images[J]. Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis, 2014, 34(4): 1075
Received: Jul. 1, 2013
Accepted: --
Published Online: Apr. 9, 2014
The Author Email: TANG Fei (tang-chu-jun@163.com)