Acta Optica Sinica (Online), Volume. 2, Issue 14, 1409005(2025)

Research Progress in Optical Bloch Surface Waves Sensors (Invited)

Mingkai Fan and Xiang Wu*
Author Affiliations
  • College of Future Information Technology, State Key Laboratory of Photovoltaic Science and Technology, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(17)
    Three conformations of 1DPCs. (a) Perfect infinite 1DPCs; (b) 1DPCs with internal defects; (c) 1DPCs with face defects
    Coupled excitation modes for BSW[41]. (a) Prism coupling; (b) grating coupling
    1DPCs energy band structure and BSW dispersion curves and optical field distribution. (a) MATLAB numerical calculation results of the energy band structure; (b) Rsoft simulation results of the energy band structure; (c)(d) light field distribution patterns at two points on the dispersion curve of BSW
    Schematic diagram of prism-coupled BSW for biosensing
    Early validation of BSW sensors. (a) Results of theoretical analysis by Villa team[55-56]; (b) comparison of the performance of BSW and SPR sensors[58]; (c) experimental validation by Giorgis team[57-58]
    Diverse applications of BSW in biosensing. (a) Peak shifts for different concentrations of biotin biotin[59]; (b) BSW-based sensors for protein aggregation detection[43]; (c) surface-label-free sensing scheme based on luminescent/fluorescent multilayer structures[60]; (d) BSW/BSSW biosensors coupled with porous silicon gratings[61]
    BSW on fiber optic platforms. (a) Novel 1D photonic bandgap sensor based on D-type fiber[62]; (b) novel fiber optic sensor based on omnidirectional reflective bands of BSW[63]; (c) novel method for excitation of BSW on tapered fibers[64]
    Optimization of BSW devices from the physical mechanism perspective. (a) BSW biosensor sensitivity versus grating constant[65]; (b) optimization of sensing performance of BSW biosensors using angular sensitivity[66]
    Biosensors for BSW based on novel materials. (a) 1DPCs structure introduced with atomic layer thickness of transition metal dihalide compounds (TMDC) materials for BSW sensors[67]; (b) LiNbO3 grating-coupled birefringent BSW sensors[68]
    Wavelength detection method. (a) Schematic diagram of detection device[31]; (b) detection spectral analysis[69]
    Angular detection method[73]. (a) Schematic diagram of detection device; (b)(c) detection spectral analysis
    Phase detection method[77]. (a) Schematic diagram of detection device; (b) phase offset at different concentrations of NaCl solution; (c) phase response at different excitation wavelengths; (d) sensitivity of phase response
    G-H shift detection method. (a) Schematic diagram of experimental setup[82]; (b)(c) G-H shift enhanced by BSW[80]
    Application of BSW in other fields (Ⅰ). (a) Fluorescence radiation enhancement[84]; (b) enhanced Raman scattering[85]; (c) optical focusing[86]; (d) plane lens[87]
    Application of BSW in other fields (Ⅱ). (a) Waveguide-on-a-chip devices[91]; (b) particle manipulation[92]; (c) nonlinear enhancement[94]; (d) high-Q lasers[95]
    Combination of metasurface and BSW. (a) Low-loss photonic integrated elements based on BSW[96]; (b) integrated diffraction gratings on the BSW platform[97]; (c) strongly coupled quasi-BICs based on BSW[98]; (d) strongly enhanced light‒matter interactions in monolayer WS2 based on BSW[100]
    • Table 1. Core performance metrics of sensors

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 1. Core performance metrics of sensors

      Performance metricDefinitionMathematical formulationPhysical interpretation
      Sensitivity (SChange in resonance parameter due to change in unit refractive index (angle Δθ or wavelength ΔλSλ=λnSθ=θnReflecting the responsiveness of the sensor to changes in refractive index46, correlates with the photonic bandgap design and the field localization strength
      Quality factor (QA measure of resonance peak sharpness, defined as the ratio of resonance wavelength to full width at half height (dFWHMQ=λresdFWHMHigh Q values indicate narrow resonance peaks, favoring high-resolution detection47-49, but possibly at the expense of sensitivity
      FOMA combination of sensitivity and resonance peak width, reflecting actual detection capabilityηFOM=SdFWHMWeighing sensitivity and resolution together, higher FOM indicates better sensing performance4750
      LODMinimum refractive index change or substance concentration detectable by the sensor

      ηLOD=3σS

      (3σ is standard deviation

      Subject to sensitivity, noise and signal-to-noise ratio, a lower LOD indicates a more sensitive sensor47-4851-54
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Mingkai Fan, Xiang Wu. Research Progress in Optical Bloch Surface Waves Sensors (Invited)[J]. Acta Optica Sinica (Online), 2025, 2(14): 1409005

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category: Micro-Nano Optics

    Received: Jan. 17, 2025

    Accepted: May. 20, 2025

    Published Online: Jul. 2, 2025

    The Author Email: Xiang Wu (wuxiang@fudan.edu.cn)

    DOI:10.3788/AOSOL250434

    CSTR:32394.14.AOSOL250434

    Topics