Advanced Photonics, Volume. 6, Issue 5, 056005(2024)
Diffraction casting
Fig. 1. Schematic diagram of DC. The selection of a logic operation is performed using reconfigurable illumination without any modification to the DOEs.
Fig. 2. Forward and backward processes of DC. The reconfigurable illumination, the DOEs, and the scaling factor are optimized through the training process.
Fig. 3. Optimization results. (a) Binary amplitude patterns on a DMD for the reconfigurable illumination and (b) phase distributions on the DOEs. Scale bar is 1 mm.
Fig. 4. Examples of the DC process with the optimized illumination and the DOEs shown in
Fig. 5. Computational errors associated with the varying number of DOEs.
Fig. 6. Computational errors associated with the varying number of DOEs for single logic operations.
Fig. 8. Computational errors associated with the varying number of DOEs for single logic operations. (a)
Fig. 9. Computational errors associated with the varying physical volume of DC.
Fig. 10. Computational errors under different positions of the input layer.
Fig. 11. Relationship between computational errors and energy efficiencies when varying the scaling factor.
Fig. 12. Relationship between computational errors and energy efficiencies with the varying buffer width (BW [pixels]).
Fig. 13. Relationships between computational errors and alignment errors along the
Fig. 14. Candidates for the experimental setups of DC using (a) transmissive phase modulation with DOEs and (b) reflective phase modulation with SLMs.
|
Get Citation
Copy Citation Text
Ryosuke Mashiko, Makoto Naruse, Ryoichi Horisaki, "Diffraction casting," Adv. Photon. 6, 056005 (2024)
Category: Research Articles
Received: May. 12, 2024
Accepted: Sep. 3, 2024
Posted: Sep. 4, 2024
Published Online: Oct. 9, 2024
The Author Email: Horisaki Ryoichi (horisaki@g.ecc.u-tokyo.ac.jp)