Infrared and Laser Engineering, Volume. 54, Issue 1, 20240388(2025)

Analysis of typical process of urban wind field with coherent wind measurement lidar

Baohua DONG1,2, Xiaowei XIA3, Peng ZHUANG4, Chenbo XIE4,5, Yueling ZHOU4, Xiantao KONG3, and Hongyan LUO6、*
Author Affiliations
  • 1Jiangxi Provincial Climate Center, Nanchang 330000, China
  • 2Nanchang National Climate Observatory, Nanchang 330038, China
  • 3School of Mechanical Engineering, Chaohu University, Hefei 238000, China
  • 4Anhui Lanke Information Technology Co., Ltd, Hefei 230031, China
  • 5Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Optics, Anhui Institute of Optics and Fine Machinics, Chinese Acaemy of Sciences, Hefei 230031, China
  • 6Shenzhen National Climate Observatory, Shenzhen 518000, China
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(30)
    Schematic diagram of the Doppler effect
    Diagram of a coherent wind radar system
    Anqing National Basic Meteorological Station comparison site map
    (a) Box plot of wind speed errors at different heights; (b) Correlation curve of wind speed at different heights
    (a) Box plot of wind direction errors at different heights; (b) Correlation curve of wind direction at different heights
    (a) Wind speed profile comparison chart; (b) Wind direction profile comparison chart; (c) Wind speed error chart; (d) Wind direction error curve chart
    Statistical chart of continuous observation data and meteorological data of coherent wind lidar
    (a)-(d) Represent the wind direction and wind speed rose diagrams at 200 m height for January, February, March, and April 2024, respectively
    (a)-(d) Represent the wind direction and wind speed rose diagrams at 500 m height for January, February, March, and April 2024, respectively
    (a)-(d) Represent the wind direction and wind speed rose diagrams at 800 m height for January, February, March, and April 2024, respectively
    (a)-(d) Represent the wind direction and wind speed rose diagrams at 1010 m height for January, February, March, and April 2024, respectively
    (a)-(d) Represent the wind direction and wind speed rose diagrams at 1550 m height for January, February, March, and April 2024, respectively
    Location map of topography and coherent wind laser mine in Pingyin County
    Cloud cover, temperature, humidity and pressure statistics for 14 February 2024
    Wind farm data as of February 14, 2024. (a) Horizontal wind speed; (b) Horizontal wind direction; (c) Vertical wind speed
    Doppler coherent wind radar spectra
    Wind speed profiles at different heights. (a) 50 m; (b) 500 m; (c) 1490 m; (d) 2000 m; (e) 2510 m; (f) 2900 m
    Wind profiles at different heights. (a) 50 m; (b) 500 m; (c) 1490 m; (d) 2000 m; (e) 2510 m; (f) 2900 m
    Wind velocity profiles of vertical airflow at different heights. (a) 50 m; (b) 500 m; (c) 1490 m; (d) 2000 m; (e) 2510 m; (f) 2900 m
    Five sets of temperature variations at different hours on sunny days
    Scatter plot of horizontal wind speed at different heights on sunny days. (a) 200 m; (b) 500 m; (c) 1000 m; (d) 1500 m
    Scatter plot of wind direction at different altitudes on a sunny day. (a) 200 m; (b) 500 m; (c) 1000 m; (d) 1500 m
    Scatter plot of vertical airflow at different heights on a sunny day. (a) 200 m; (b) 500 m; (c) 1000 m; (d) 1500 m
    Near-surface meteorological data of Beijing
    Wind radar map of Beijing from June 21 to 23. (a) Horizontal wind speed; (b) Horizontal wind direction; (c) Vertical wind speed
    Wind direction profile at 9 a.m. and 9 p.m. on 21-23 June 2024
    • Table 1. Design parameter table for coherent wind radar

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 1. Design parameter table for coherent wind radar

      Technical parametersValue
      Wavelength/nm1550
      Detection distance/m50-4000
      Spatial resolution/m30,45,60,90
      Temporal resolution/s10
      Wind speed measurement range/m·s−10-60
      Wind direction measurement range/(°)0-360
      Wind direction error/(°)≤8
      Horizontal wind speed error/m·s−1≤0.8
      Vertical airflow error/m·s−1≤0.3
      Blind spot/m≤50
      Operating temperature/℃−40-50
      Weight/kg≤45
    • Table 2. Comparison table of wind speed error and correlation at different heights

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 2. Comparison table of wind speed error and correlation at different heights

      Height/mNumber of samplesCorrelationMean errorMedian error25th percentile error75th percentile error
      注:*表示在0.05水平上显著相关
      320720.966*0.601−0.113−0.5160.333
      500720.975*0.5980.080−0.6260.497
      680720.980*0.528−0.156−0.6230.261
      860720.975*0.584−0.044−0.5910.441
      1040720.965*0.657−0.141−0.7590.498
      1220720.974*0.572−0.173−0.5480.246
      1400680.974*0.6630.145−0.6000.679
      1580680.987*0.5010.271−0.0340.576
      1760680.982*0.5510.124−0.2570.508
      1940640.981*0.5000.030−0.3580.418
      2120590.967*0.597−0.318−0.5160.541
      2300520.958*0.659−0.325−0.7590.432
      2480540.971*0.494−0.112−0.4810.324
      2660360.937*0.6250.075−0.4830.737
      2840330.871*0.774−0.263−0.6060.560
    • Table 3. Comparison table of wind direction error and correlation at different altitudes

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 3. Comparison table of wind direction error and correlation at different altitudes

      Height/mNumber of samplesCorrelationMean errorMedian error25th percentile error75th percentile error
      注:*表示在0.05水平上显著相关
      320720.972*7.405−2.24−6.3960.125
      500720.982*6.432−2.67−8.1581.086
      680720.986*5.062−1.13−5.6311.938
      860720.977*5.7570.912−4.1144.482
      1040720.982*6.2601.415−3.4134.724
      1220720.974*7.880−2.57−6.9873.457
      1400680.985*8.088−1.15−6.4846.791
      1580680.995*5.886−0.82−5.4502.634
      1760680.975*6.616−2.57−7.8342.756
      1940640.994*5.9870.280−4.4314.711
      2120590.961*7.7850.695−5.4025.670
      2300520.958*8.1830.941−2.8456.397
      2480540.929*7.9300.713−3.0567.649
      2660360.929*9.841−0.58−6.4597.489
      2840330.945*7.6060.267−6.8655.906
    • Table 4. Coherent wind radar and radiosonde data profile error table

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 4. Coherent wind radar and radiosonde data profile error table

      GroupTypeHeight/mCorrelationMean absolute errorStandard deviation
      1Wind speed50-25000.9600.41 m/s0.54 m/s
      Wind direction0.9667.08°7.45°
      2Wind speed50-23000.9240.27 m/s0.39 m/s
      Wind direction0.9813.54°4.13°
      3Wind speed50-26000.9420.333 m/s0.47 m/s
      Wind direction0.9655.36°4.52°
      4Wind speed50-25000.9860.92 m/s2.65 m/s
      Wind direction0.9275.36°6.07°
      5Wind speed50-24000.9740.91 m/s1.06 m/s
      Wind direction0.9306.49°8.87°
      6Wind speed50-30000.9880.37 m/s0.49 m/s
      Wind direction0.9967.04°8.05°
      MeanWind speed-0.9620.5350.93 m/s
      Wind direction0.9605.81°6.52°
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Baohua DONG, Xiaowei XIA, Peng ZHUANG, Chenbo XIE, Yueling ZHOU, Xiantao KONG, Hongyan LUO. Analysis of typical process of urban wind field with coherent wind measurement lidar[J]. Infrared and Laser Engineering, 2025, 54(1): 20240388

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category: 激光器与激光光学

    Received: Sep. 10, 2024

    Accepted: --

    Published Online: Feb. 12, 2025

    The Author Email: Hongyan LUO (lhycc008@163.com)

    DOI:10.3788/IRLA20240388

    Topics