NUCLEAR TECHNIQUES, Volume. 46, Issue 11, 110505(2023)

Truncated pulse height estimator based on an improved UNet model

Lin TANG1,3, Shuang ZHOU1, Xianli LIAO1,2, Ze LIU1, and Bo LI1、*
Author Affiliations
  • 1College of Electronic Information and Electrical Engineering, Chengdu University, Chengdu 610106, China
  • 2School of Nuclear Technology and Automation Engineering, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China
  • 3School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 639798, Singapore
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(9)
    Output signal of a preamplifier
    Generation process of datasets
    Structural diagram of UNet-LSTM model
    Changes in loss values during the training of the UNet-LSTM model (color online)
    Simulated pulse sequence diagram
    Trapezoidal shaping result (color online)
    Photographs of experimental setup (a) Detector, (b) X-ray tube
    • Table 1. Comparison between the estimated and true values of the pulse height using neural network models

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 1. Comparison between the estimated and true values of the pulse height using neural network models

      序列

      Sequence

      脉冲

      Pulse

      是否截断

      Truncated or not

      脉冲高度Pulse amplitude

      Areal

      梯形成形值Trapezoidal shaping value ATrape

      相对误差Relative error

      δTrape / %

      模型估计值Model estimate

      AUNet

      相对误差Relative error

      δUNet / %

      S1

      Rt=25%)

      P1No0.961.014.980.933.01
      P2No0.320.306.100.311.08
      P3Yes0.590.4621.330.573.73
      P4No0.430.453.720.405.88

      S2

      Rt=50%)

      P5No0.710.732.380.710.38
      P6Yes0.500.491.820.523.67
      P7Yes0.460.471.880.443.27
      P8No0.730.764.210.713.15

      S3

      Rt=50%)

      P9Yes0.660.671.730.660.76
      P10No0.400.414.450.401.01
      P11Yes0.710.755.300.692.34
      P12No0.520.544.360.511.16

      S4

      Rt=25%)

      P13No0.710.721.950.721.27
      P14Yes0.510.521.540.521.97
      P15No0.600.612.130.623.35
      P16No0.790.824.250.801.39

      S5

      Rt=50%)

      P17No0.460.452.630.452.18
      P18Yes0.720.754.420.702.09
      P19Yes0.940.950.310.931.38
      P20No0.460.444.940.483.12
    • Table 2. Comparison of the pulse height estimation effects of neural network models on different samples

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 2. Comparison of the pulse height estimation effects of neural network models on different samples

      序号Number样品类型Sample type截断率Truncation rate / %平均相对误差Average relative error / %
      1

      粉末铁矿

      样品Powder iron ore sample

      252.21
      2502.46
      3752.42
      41002.75
      5

      粉末岩石

      样品Powder rock sample

      251.19
      6502.41
      7752.15
      81003.28
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Lin TANG, Shuang ZHOU, Xianli LIAO, Ze LIU, Bo LI. Truncated pulse height estimator based on an improved UNet model[J]. NUCLEAR TECHNIQUES, 2023, 46(11): 110505

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category: Research Articles

    Received: May. 31, 2023

    Accepted: --

    Published Online: Dec. 23, 2023

    The Author Email:

    DOI:10.11889/j.0253-3219.2023.hjs.46.110505

    Topics