Photonics Research, Volume. 12, Issue 11, 2474(2024)

Two-photon 3D printed fiber-optic Fabry–Perot probe for triaxial contact force detection of guidewire tips

Ruixue Yin1,2、†, Yuhang Yang1、†, Linsong Hou3, Heming Wei3、*, Hongbo Zhang1, and Wenjun Zhang4
Author Affiliations
  • 1Shanghai Key Laboratory of Intelligent Sensing and Detection, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai 200237, China
  • 2National Center for Translational Medicine (Shanghai) SHU Branch, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China
  • 3Key Laboratory of Specialty Fiber Optics and Optical Access Networks, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China
  • 4Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7N5A9, Canada
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(12)
    (a) Concept diagram of a triaxial force sensor integrated into a medical guidewire for contact force monitoring. (b) Cross-sectional view of the designed triaxial force sensor integrated into the guidewire tip. (c) Sensor and guidewire integration process. (d) Force-induced deformation of circular diaphragm and schematic diagram of optical interference in a single FPI microcavity.
    Three-axis force decoupling model. (a) Sensor indication when the directional force Fz acts. (b) Sensor indication when the radial force Fx acts. (c) Space force resolution indication. (d) Microluminal and microcolumn position indication.
    (a) Deformation results of the sensor film when axial force (F=0.5 N) is applied to the sensor tip with different film thicknesses. (b) Deformation results of the sensor film when axial force (F=0.5 N) is applied to the sensor tip of micropillars with different diameters. (c) Displacements of various points along the central axis of the diaphragm’s lower surface under different forces. (d) Relationship between diaphragm center displacement and force.
    (a) Diaphragm displacement against applied force Fz. (b) Diaphragm displacement against applied force Fn. (c) Waveform offset plot. (d) Peak wavelength versus applied force.
    (a) Schematic diagram of the principle of two-photon 3D printing. (b) SEM image of the actual TPP of the designed sensor. (c) Steps for integrating the designed sensor and guidewire.
    Force measurement system schematic.
    (a) Spectral changes in the four interference cavities when the sensor is subjected to axial stress. (b) Relationship between the spectral displacement and force of the four interference cavities when an axial force is applied. (c) Spectral changes of the four interference cavities when the sensor is acted upon by a 45° spatial force. (d) Relationship between the spectral displacement and the force of the four interference cavities when a 45° spatial force is applied. (e) Verification of the spectral shift characteristics of a single cavity length of the sensor when force is applied and released. (f) Repeat test results.
    (a) Relationship between the wavelength shifts of each interference cavity under the action of axial force Fz. (b) Relationship between the wavelength shifts of each interference cavity under the action of radial force Fx.
    • Table 1. Detailed Parameters of the Components of the Sensor

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 1. Detailed Parameters of the Components of the Sensor

      ComponentYoung’s ModulusPoisson RatioMaterial
      Guidewire shaft core194 GPa0.29304 stainless-steel
      Optical fiber72 GPa0.17Silica
      Hemispherical guidewire tip3.3 GPa0.35Epoxy resin
      Fabry–Perot interference force sensing structure [38]1.05 GPa0.33Photoresist
    • Table 2. Sensor Force Measurement Error Statistics

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 2. Sensor Force Measurement Error Statistics

      Standard Working Curve Estimated Force (N)Actual Measured Force and Error (N)
      00.01628±0.00672
      0.054130.05421±0.00858
      0.10360.0931±0.00649
      0.153370.1372±0.01665
      0.202070.18043±0.0286
      0.25020.22769±0.0184
      0.29940.27993±0.0139
      0.352130.32529±0.01419
      0.401130.38045±0.01781
      0.45170.45403±0.00345
      0.501270.51884±0.01109
    • Table 3. Sensor Performance

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 3. Sensor Performance

      PropertyParameter Size
      Sensor diameterØ 0.89 mm (0.035 in.)
      Working range of each channel00.5  N(050  g)
      Sensitivity of each channel85.115797±3.68917  nm/N
      Resolution0.2355 mN
      Linearity98.34%
    • Table 4. Comparison of Force Sensors for Minimally Invasive Surgeries

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 4. Comparison of Force Sensors for Minimally Invasive Surgeries

      Sensing PrincipleDimensionSensitivityDetection LimitSizeReference
      Piezoresistive type3D1.34×103(ΔR/R)μm5 mN360 μm[40]
      3D1.0×102(ΔR/R)μm25 gf360 μm[41]
      3D0.02  N10.35 N3.5 mm[42]
      Magnetic type3D13.3 V/N0.12 N5 mm[18]
      Fiber type: FBG3D392.17 pm/N5 N5 mm[43]
      3D383.79 pm/N5 N10 mm[20]
      3D418.955 pm/N0.8 N4 mm[19]
      Fiber type: FPI1D23.37 nm/N1000 Pa4 mm[44]
      3D85.16 nm/N0.5 N890 μmThis work
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Ruixue Yin, Yuhang Yang, Linsong Hou, Heming Wei, Hongbo Zhang, Wenjun Zhang, "Two-photon 3D printed fiber-optic Fabry–Perot probe for triaxial contact force detection of guidewire tips," Photonics Res. 12, 2474 (2024)

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category: Fiber Optics and Optical Communications

    Received: Apr. 11, 2024

    Accepted: Jul. 31, 2024

    Published Online: Oct. 17, 2024

    The Author Email: Heming Wei (hmwei@shu.edu.cn)

    DOI:10.1364/PRJ.525651

    Topics