[1] A. Ejlli, S. M. Vermeulen, E. Schwartz et al. Probing dark matter with polarimetry techniques. Phys. Rev. D, 107, 083035(2023).

[2] S. Song, J. Kim, T. Moon et al. Polarization-sensitive intensity diffraction tomography. Light Sci. Appl., 12, 124(2023).

[3] A. Lininger, G. Palermo, A. Guglielmelli et al. Chirality in light–matter interaction. Adv. Mater., 35, 2107325(2023).

[4] C. He, H. He, J. Chang et al. Polarisation optics for biomedical and clinical applications: a review. Light Sci. Appl., 10, 194(2021).

[5] N. Tueni, J. Vizet, M. Genet et al. Microstructural deformation observed by Mueller polarimetry during traction assay on myocardium samples. Sci. Rep., 10, 20531(2020).

[6] W. Dzwolak. Chirality and chiroptical properties of amyloid fibrils. Chirality, 26, 580(2014).

[7] Z.-J. Cheng, Y. Yang, H.-Y. Huang et al. Single-shot quantitative birefringence microscopy for imaging birefringence parameters. Opt. Lett., 44, 3018(2019).

[8] V. Giovannetti, S. Lloyd, L. Maccone et al. “Sub-Rayleigh-diffraction-bound quantum imaging. Phys. Rev. A Atomic Molecular Opt. Phys., 79, 013827(2009).

[9] F. Wolfgramm, C. Vitelli, F. A. Beduini et al. Entanglement-enhanced probing of a delicate material system. Nat. Photonics, 7, 28(2013).

[10] N. Li, C. Hu, X.-M. Lu. Information-theoretic perspective on performance assessment and fundamental limit of quantum imaging [Invited]. Chin. Opt. Lett., 22, 060009(2024).

[11] G. Brida, M. Genovese, I. Ruo Berchera. Experimental realization of sub-shot-noise quantum imaging. Nat. Photonics, 4, 227(2010).

[12] T. Ono, R. Okamoto, S. Takeuchi. An entanglement-enhanced microscope. Nat. Commun., 4, 2426(2013).

[13] P. S. Blakey, H. Liu, G. Papangelakis et al. Quantum and non-local effects offer over 40 dB noise resilience advantage towards quantum lidar. Nat. Commun., 13, 5633(2022).

[14] G. B. Lemos, V. Borish, G. D. Cole et al. Quantum imaging with undetected photons. Nature, 512, 409(2014).

[15] C. L. Degen, F. Reinhard, P. Cappellaro. Quantum sensing. Rev. Mod. Phys., 89, 035002(2017).

[16] S. Pirandola, B. R. Bardhan, T. Gehring et al. Advances in photonic quantum sensing. Nat. Photonics, 12, 724(2018).

[17] M. Gilaberte Basset, F. Setzpfandt, F. Steinlechner et al. Perspectives for applications of quantum imaging. Laser Photonics Rev., 13, 1900097(2019).

[18] C. Moodley, A. Forbes. Advances in quantum imaging with machine intelligence. Laser Photonics Rev., 18, 2300939(2024).

[19] J. Liu, X. Su. Quantum-enhanced microscopic imaging technology [Invited]. Chin. Opt. Lett., 22, 060010(2024).

[20] Y. Shih. Ghost imaging—its physics and application [Invited]. Chin. Opt. Lett., 22, 060011(2024).

[21] P. Li, X. Chen, X. Qiu et al. Ghost imaging, development, and recent advances [Invited]. Chin. Opt. Lett., 22, 112701(2024).

[22] H. Defienne, W. P. Bowen, M. Chekhova et al. Advances in quantum imaging. Nat. Photonics, 18, 1024(2024).

[23] K. C. Toussaint, G. Di Giuseppe, K. J. Bycenski et al. Quantum ellipsometry using correlated-photon beams. Phys. Rev. A Atomic, Molecular, Opt. Phys., 70, 023801(2004).

[24] A. Z. Goldberg. Quantum theory of polarimetry: from quantum operations to Mueller matrices. Phys. Rev. Res., 2, 023038(2020).

[25] S. Magnitskiy, D. Agapov, A. Chirkin. Quantum ghost polarimetry with entangled photons. Opt. Lett., 47, 754(2022).

[26] V. R. Besaga, L. Zhang, A. Vega et al. Nonlocal quantum differentiation between polarization objects using entanglement. APL Photonics, 9, 041301(2024).

[27] Y. Zhang, Z. He, X. Tong et al. Quantum imaging of biological organisms through spatial and polarization entanglement. Sci. Adv., 10, 1495(2024).

[28] A. Z. Goldberg, J. R. Hervas, A. S. Sanz et al. Robust quantum metrology with random Majorana constellations. Quantum Sci. Technol., 10, 015053(2024).

[29] S.-J. Yoon, J.-S. Lee, C. Rockstuhl et al. Experimental quantum polarimetry using heralded single photons. Metrologia, 57, 045008(2020).

[30] S. Restuccia, G. M. Gibson, L. Cronin et al. Measuring optical activity with unpolarized light: ghost polarimetry. Phys. Rev. A, 106, 062601(2022).

[31] A. Pedram, V. R. Besaga, F. Setzpfandt et al. Nonlocality enhanced precision in quantum polarimetry via entangled photons. Adv. Quantum Technol., 7, 2400059(2024).

[32] Y. Israel, S. Rosen, Y. Silberberg. Supersensitive polarization microscopy using NOON states of light. Phys. Rev. Lett., 112, 103604(2014).

[33] L. Shi, E. J. Galvez, R. R. Alfano. Photon entanglement through brain tissue. Sci. Rep., 6, 37714(2016).

[34] E. Galvez, B. Sharma, F. Williams et al. Decoherence of photon entanglement by transmission through brain tissue with Alzheimer’s disease. Biomed Opt. Exp., 13, 6621(2022).

[35] M. Pryce, J. Ward. Angular correlation effects with annihilation radiation. Nature, 160, 435(1947).

[36] D. C. Burnham, D. L. Weinberg. Observation of simultaneity in parametric production of optical photon pairs. Phys. Rev. Lett., 25, 84(1970).

[37] D. Magde, H. Mahr. Study in ammonium dihydrogen phosphate of spontaneous parametric interaction tunable from 4400 to 16 000 Å. Phys. Rev. Lett., 18, 905(1967).

[38] D. Bohm. Quantum Theory(1989).

[39] M. Born, E. Wolf. Principles of Optics: Electromagnetic Theory of Propagation, Interference and Diffraction of Light(2013).

[40] L. Mandel, E. Wolf. Optical Coherence and Quantum Optics(1995).

[41] P. Usachev, J. Söderholm, G. Björk et al. Experimental verification of differences between classical and quantum polarization properties. Opt. Commun., 193, 161(2001).

[42] G. Björk, J. Söderholm, L. L. Sánchez-Soto et al. Quantum degrees of polarization. Opt. Commun., 283, 4440(2010).

[43] R. M. Azzam. Stokes-vector and Mueller-matrix polarimetry. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A, 33, 1396(2016).

[44] A. Z. Goldberg. Quantum theory of polarimetry: from quantum operations to Mueller matrices. Phys. Rev. Res., 2, 023038(2020).

[45] A. Pedram, V. R. Besaga, L. Gassab et al. Quantum estimation of the stokes vector rotation for a general polarimetric transformation. New J. Phys., 26, 093033(2024).

[46] V. R. Besaga, I. V. Lopushenko, O. Sieryi et al. Bridging classical and quantum approaches in optical polarimetry: predicting polarization-entangled photon behavior in scattering environments(2024).

[47] A. Luis. Degree of polarization in quantum optics. Phys. Rev. A, 66, 013806(2002).

[48] A. F. Abouraddy, A. V. Sergienko, B. E. Saleh et al. Quantum entanglement and the two-photon Stokes parameters. Opt. Commun., 201, 93(2002).

[49] J. Söderholm, G. Björk, A. B. Klimov et al. Quantum polarization characterization and tomography. New J. Phys., 14, 115014(2012).

[50] S. Restuccia, G. M. Gibson, L. Cronin et al. Measuring optical activity with unpolarized light: ghost polarimetry. Phys. Rev. A, 106, 062601(2022).

[51] R. Camphausen, Á. Cuevas, L. Duempelmann et al. A quantum-enhanced wide-field phase imager. Sci. Adv., 7, 2155(2021).

[52] E. Losero, I. Ruo-Berchera, A. Meda et al. Unbiased estimation of an optical loss at the ultimate quantum limit with twin-beams. Sci. Rep., 8, 7431(2018).

[53] V. Cimini, E. Polino, F. Belliardo et al. Experimental metrology beyond the standard quantum limit for a wide resources range. NPJ Quantum Inf., 9, 20(2023).

[54] M. Gandola, E. Manuzzato, M. Perenzoni et al. A 100 × 100 CMOS SPAD array with in-pixel correlation techniques for fast quantum ghost imaging applications. ESSCIRC 2023-IEEE 49th European Solid State Circuits Conference (ESSCIRC)(2023).

[55] H. Defienne, M. Reichert, J. W. Fleischer. General model of photon-pair detection with an image sensor. Phys. Rev. Lett., 120, 203604(2018).

[56] A. Hannonen, B. J. Hoenders, W. Elsässer et al. Ghost polarimetry using Stokes correlations. JOSA A, 37, 714(2020).

[57] A. Vega, T. Pertsch, F. Setzpfandt et al. Metasurface-assisted quantum ghost discrimination of polarization objects. Phys. Rev. Appl, 16, 064032(2021).

[58] A. F. Abouraddy, J. Toussaint, C. Kimani et al. Entangled-photon ellipsometry. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B, 19, 656(2002).

[59] M.-Y. Xie, S.-J. Niu, Z. Ge et al. Entanglement-assisted polarimeter for phase retardance measurement. Chin. Opt. Lett., 23, 072701(2025).

[60] M. Mohseni, A. T. Rezakhani, D. A. Lidar. Quantum-process tomography: resource analysis of different strategies. Phys. Rev. A Atomic Molecular Opt. Phys., 77, 032322(2008).

[61] D. F. V. James, P. G. Kwiat, W. J. Munro et al. Measurement of qubits. Phys. Rev. A, 64, 052312(2001).

[62] A. P. Alodjants, S. M. Arakelian. Quantum phase measurements and non-classical polarization states of light. J. Mod. Opt., 46, 475(1999).

[63] A. F. Abouraddy, K. C. Toussaint, A. V. Sergienko et al. Ellipsometric measurements by use of photon pairs generated by spontaneous parametric downconversion. Opt. Lett., 26, 1717(2001).

[64] S. Magnitskiy, D. Agapov, A. Chirkin. Ghost polarimetry with unpolarized pseudo-thermal light. Opt. Lett., 45, 3641(2020).

[65] S. A. Magnitskiy, D. P. Agapov, I. A. Belovolov et al. Ghost polarimetry in classical and quantum light. Moscow Univ. Phys. Bull., 76, 424(2022).

[66] M.-Y. Xie, S.-J. Niu, Z.-Q.-Z. Han et al. Quantum-enhanced imaging for characterizing anisotropic material. NPJ Quantum Inf., 11, 57(2025).

[67] A. Belsley, J. C. F. Matthews. Estimating the concentration of chiral media with bright squeezed light. Appl. Phys. Lett., 121, 184001(2022).

[68] N. A. Peters, J. T. Barreiro, M. E. Goggin et al. Remote state preparation: arbitrary remote control of photon polarization. Phys. Rev. Lett., 94, 150502(2005).

[69] L. Zhang, V. R. Besaga, P. Rühl et al. Probing polarization response of monolayer cell cultures with entangled photon pairs. J. Biophot., e202400018(2024).

[70] V. R. Besaga, F. Ott, T. Meyer-Zedler et al. Application of polarization-entangled photon pairs for studying the density of microorganisms. Proc. SPIE, 12993, 129930A(2024).

[71] C. Altuzarra, A. Lyons, G. Yuan et al. Imaging of polarization-sensitive metasurfaces with quantum entanglement. Phys. Rev. A, 99, 020101(2019).

[72] M. Kaur, M. Singh. Quantum imaging of a polarisation sensitive phase pattern with hyper-entangled photons. Sci. Rep., 11, 23636(2021).

[73] M. Samad, M. Shimizu, Y. Hijikata. Demonstration of quantum polarized microscopy using an entangled-photon source. Photonics, 12, 127(2025).

[74] A. Z. Goldberg, A. B. Klimov, G. Leuchs et al. Rotation sensing at the ultimate limit. J. Phys. Photonics, 3, 022008(2021).

[75] A. Z. Goldberg, L. L. Sánchez-Soto, H. Ferretti. Intrinsic sensitivity limits for multiparameter quantum metrology. Phys. Rev. Lett., 127, 110501(2021).

[76] A. Pedram, Ö. E. Müstecaplıoğlu, I. K. Kominis. Using quantum states of light to probe the retinal network. Phys. Rev. Res., 4, 033060(2022).

[77] L. Gassab, A. Pedram, Ö. E. Müstecaplıoğlu. Conditions on detecting three-photon entanglement in psychophysical experiments. Eur. Phys. J. Plus, 139, 379(2024).

[78] J. Cao, M. Zhou, R. Zhang et al. Robust optical quantum imaging framework with entangled photons in oceanic turbulent environments. IEEE Trans. Commun., 1(2025).

[79] E. Brambila, R. Gómez, R. Fazili et al. Ultrabright polarization-entangled photon pair source for frequency-multiplexed quantum communication in free-space. Opt Exp., 31, 16107(2023).

[80] R. Pollmann, F. Roeder, V. Quiring et al. Integrated, bright broadband, two-colour parametric down-conversion source. Opt Exp., 32, 23945(2024).

[81] V. Venkataraman, J. Ghosh. Bright source of narrowband polarization-entangled photons from a thick type-II ppKTP crystal. Opt Exp., 32, 3470(2024).

[82] K. Park, J. Lee, D.-G. Im et al. Ultrabright fiber-coupled ploarization-entangled photon source with spectral brightness surpassing 2.0 MHz/mW/nm(2024).

[83] N. Schwaller, G. Park, R. Okamoto et al. Optimizing the coupling efficiency of spontaneous parametric down-conversion photon pairs into single-mode fibers. Phys. Rev. A, 106, 043719(2022).

[84] L. Coccia, A. Santamato, G. Vallone et al. Optimal focusing conditions for bright spontaneous parametric down-conversion sources. Phys. Rev. A, 107, 063712(2023).

[85] A. Dousse, J. Suffczyński, A. Beveratos et al. Ultrabright source of entangled photon pairs. Nature, 466, 217(2010).

[86] C. Schimpf, M. Reindl, F. Basso Basset et al. Quantum dots as potential sources of strongly entangled photons: perspectives and challenges for applications in quantum networks. Appl. Phys. Lett., 118, 100502(2021).

[87] A. N. Craddock, Y. Wang, F. Giraldo et al. High-rate subgigahertz-linewidth bichromatic entanglement source for quantum networking. Phys. Rev. Appl., 21, 034012(2024).

[88] K. Choi, J.-W. Lee, J. Shin et al. Real-time noise-free inline self-interference incoherent digital holography with temporal geometric phase multiplexing. Photonics Res., 11, 906(2023).

[89] J. B. Altepeter, P. Matteo, D. F. V. James, Ř. Jaroslav, P. G. Kwiat. Qubit quantum state tomography. Quantum State Estimation, 113(2004).

[90] S. Ahmed, C. Sánchez Muñoz, F. Nori et al. Classification and reconstruction of optical quantum states with deep neural networks. Phys. Rev. Res., 3, 033278(2021).

[91] E. Toninelli, B. Ndagano, A. Vallés et al. Concepts in quantum state tomography and classical implementation with intense light: a tutorial. Adv. Opt. Photonics, 11, 67(2019).

[92] S. Lung, K. Wang, N. R. Pedersen et al. Robust classical and quantum polarimetry with a single nanostructured metagrating. ACS Photonics, 11, 1060(2024).

[93] J. F. De Boer, C. K. Hitzenberger, Y. Yasuno. Polarization sensitive optical coherence tomography–a review. Biomedical Optics Express, 8, 1838(2017).

[94] P. Yepiz-Graciano, Z. Ibarra-Borja, R. Ramírez Alarcón et al. Quantum optical coherence microscopy for bioimaging applications. Phys. Rev. Appl, 18, 034060(2022).

[95] M. R. Brown, M. Allgaier, V. Thiel et al. Interferometric imaging using shared quantum entanglement. Phys. Rev. Lett., 131, 210801(2023).

[96] J. Leach, B. Jack, J. Romero et al. Quantum correlations in optical angle–orbital angular momentum variables. Science, 329, 662(2010).

[97] Y. Shen, C. Rosales-Guzmán. Nonseparable states of light: from quantum to classical. Laser Photonics Rev., 16, 2100533(2022).

[98] S. Mamani, L. Shi, T. Ahmed et al. Transmission of classically entangled beams through mouse brain tissue. J. Biophotonics, 11, e201800096(2018).

[99] S. Mamani, L. Shi, D. Nolan et al. Majorana vortex photons a form of entangled photons propagation through brain tissue. J. Biophotonics, 12, e201900036(2019).

[100] S. Mamani-Reyes, L. Shi, D. A. Nolan et al. Generalized special functions are Majorana-like photons. Proc. SPIE, 11234, 112340L(2020).

[101] I. Meglinski, I. Lopushenko, A. Sdobnov et al. Phase preservation of orbital angular momentum of light in multiple scattering environment. Light Sci. Appl., 13, 214(2024).

[102] Y. Shen, Q. Zhang, P. Shi et al. Optical skyrmions and other topological quasiparticles of light. Nat. Photonics, 18, 15(2024).

[103] A. Forbes, M. De Oliveira, M. R. Dennis. Structured light. Nat. Photonics, 15, 253(2021).

[104] C. He, Y. Shen, A. Forbes. Towards higher-dimensional structured light. Light Sci. Appl., 11, 205(2022).

[105] P. G. Kwiat, K. Mattle, H. Weinfurter et al. New high-intensity source of polarization-entangled photon pairs. Phys. Rev. Lett., 75, 4337(1995).

[106] P. G. Kwiat, E. Waks, A. G. White et al. Ultrabright source of polarization-entangled photons. Phys. Rev. A, 60, R773(1999).

[107] R. Horn, T. Jennewein. Auto-balancing and robust interferometer designs for polarization entangled photon sources. Opt Exp., 27, 17369(2019).

[108] B.-S. Shi, A. Tomita. Generation of a pulsed polarization entangled photon pair using a Sagnac interferometer. Phys. Rev. A, 69, 013803(2004).

[109] C.-K. Hong, Z.-Y. Ou, L. Mandel. Measurement of subpicosecond time intervals between two photons by interference. Phys. Rev. Lett., 59, 2044(1987).

[110] F. Shafiei, P. Srinivasan, Z. Ou. Generation of three-photon entangled state by quantum interference between a coherent state and parametric down-conversion. Phys. Rev. A Atomic Molecular Opt. Phys., 70, 043803(2004).

[111] H. F. Hofmann, T. Ono. High-photon-number path entanglement in the interference of spontaneously down-converted photon pairs with coherent laser light. Phys. Rev. A Atomic Molecular Opt. Phys., 76, 031806(2007).

[112] I. Afek, O. Ambar, Y. Silberberg. High-NOON states by mixing quantum and classical light. Science, 328, 879(2010).

[113] L. Zhang, K. W. C. Chan. Efficient methods for generating multi-mode NOON states. Opt. Commun., 452, 258(2019).

[114] D. Stoler. Equivalence classes of minimum uncertainty packets. Phys. Rev. D, 1, 3217(1970).

[115] E. Lu. New coherent states of the electromagnetic field. Lettere al Nuovo Cimento (1971-1985), 2, 1241(1971).

[116] H. P. Yuen. Two-photon coherent states of the radiation field. Phys. Rev. A, 13, 2226(1976).

[117] U. L. Andersen, T. Gehring, C. Marquardt et al. 30 years of squeezed light generation. Phys. Scr., 91, 053001(2016).

[118] R. Schnabel. Squeezed states of light and their applications in laser interferometers. Phys. Rep., 684, 1(2017).

[119] C. Couteau. Spontaneous parametric down-conversion. Contemp. Phys., 59, 291(2018).

[120] C. Zhang, Y. F. Huang, B. H. Liu et al. Spontaneous parametric down-conversion sources for multiphoton experiments. Adv. Quantum Technol., 4, 2000132(2021).

[121] X. Chen, Z. Fu, Q. Gong et al. Quantum entanglement on photonic chips: a review. Adv. Photonics, 3, 064002(2021).