Journal of Inorganic Materials, Volume. 34, Issue 6, 573(2019)
Figures & Tables(22)
6. Non-radiative decay rate vs phonon energy of some Pr3+ doped crystals
8. Upper state level lifetime vs phonon energy of some Pr3+ doped crystals
15. Output power vs laser wavelength of Pr3+, Dy3+, Tb3+, Sm3+, Ho3+, Er3+, Eu3+ doped some common crystals
Table 1. Lasing wavelength
λ em, emission cross-sectionσ em andσ emτ for the 3P0→3H6 transition of Pr3+ doped YAP and other crystalsView tableView in ArticleTable 1. Lasing wavelength
λ em, emission cross-sectionσ em andσ emτ for the 3P0→3H6 transition of Pr3+ doped YAP and other crystalsTransitions Parameters LLF YLF GLF LaF3 BYF LMA ASL YAP SRA Absorption 3H4→3P2 labs/nm σabs /(×10-20, cm2) FWHMabs /nm 444 10.3 1.70 444 9.0 1.80 444 7.8 1.9 442 1.6 5 445 3.7 - 444 1.2 7.1 444 1.3 - 449 5.64 5.6 445 1.14 9.59 Emission 3P1→3H5 lem/nm σem /(×10-20, cm2) FWHMem /nm σemτf /(×10-20, cm2·μs) 522 3 ~2 113.7 522 3 ~2 107.1 522 3 1 130.8 537 0.7 ~3 35.7 522 0.4 ~4 17.9 530 0.25 4 8.6 542 2 - 76 533 8.8 1.9 168.6 525 1.35 9.8 41.5 3P0→3H6 lem/nm σem /(×10-20, cm2) FWHMem /nm σemτf /(×10-20, cm2·μs) 607 12 ~3 454.8 607 14 ~3 499.8 607 13 - 566.8 610 2.9 ~6.9 147.9 607 24.7 1.2 1062.1 625 3.7 11 127.7 620 2.9 - 110.2 621 25.01 1.56 479.2 622 3.52 6.53 108.3 3P0→3F2 lem/nm σem /(×10-20, cm2) FWHMem /nm σemτf /(×10-20, cm2·μs) 640 21 ~0.7 795.9 640 22 ~0.7 785.4 640 23 - 1003 635 1.2 ~1 61.2 639 12.1 0.6 520.3 647 2.3 6.6 79.4 643 8.5 - 323 662 4.71 1.28 90.2 644 10.37 5.07 319.0 3P0→3F4 lem/nm σem /(×10-20, cm2) FWHMem /nm σemτf /(×10-20, cm2·μs) 720 7 ~1 265.3 720 9 ~1 321.3 720 16 - 697.6 720 6.6 ~3 336.6 721 7.3 1.3 309.6 728 3.3 8.5 113.9 725 11 - 418 747 10.37 1.54 198.7 725 5.75 4.35 176.9 τf/μs 37.90 35.70 43.6 51 43 34.5 38 19.16 30.76 Ref. [23] [23] [23] [24] [25-26] [27] [28] This work
Table 2. Visible laser output of Pr3+ doped crystals
View tableView in ArticleTable 2. Visible laser output of Pr3+ doped crystals
Hosts λem/nm Polarizations Laser transitions ηslope/% Pout/mW Pthr/mW Pump source Year YLF 491 σ 3PJ→3H4 6 70 285 2w-OPSL 2014[ 44 ]523 π 3PJ→3H5 45 ~4200 >500 2×2w-OPSL 2016[ 17 ]546 π 3PJ→3H5 60 2000 120 2w-OPSL 2014[ 45 ]605 σ 3PJ→3H6 25 2100 ~1500 Blue-LD 2017[ 46 ]2017[ 46 ]640 σ 3PJ→3F2 50 4800 ~500 Blue-LD 698 σ 3PJ→3F3 36 1300 78 InGaN-LD 2016[ 47 ]721 π 3PJ→3F4 53 1000 16 2w-OPSL 2014[ 47 ]LLF 523 E//c 3P0→3H5 56 52.7 10 2-OPSL 2007[ 48 ]607 E//c 3P0→3H6 31 34.5 26 2-OPSL 2007[ 48 ]640 E//c 3P0→3F2 56 52.7 39 2-OPSL 2007[ 48 ]722 E//c 3P0→3F4 46 50 31 2-OPSL 2007[ 48 ]BYF 495 E//X 3PJ→3H4 27 201 163 2w-OPSL 2014[ 44 ]607 E//Y 3PJ→3H6 12.6 99 264 Blue-LD 2014[ 49 ]639 E//Y 3PJ→3F2 6.4 60 146 Blue-LD 2014[ 49 ]KYF 554 - 3PJ→3H5 27 121 166 InGaN-LD 2013[ 50 ]610 - 3PJ→3H6 18 97 162 InGaN-LD 2013[ 50 ]645 - 3PJ→3F2 38 268 30 InGaN-LD 2013[ 50 ]YGF 523 E//a 3PJ→3H5 11 63 148 InGaN-LD 2015[ 21 ]538 E//b 3PJ→3H5 24 140 135 InGaN-LD 2015[ 21 ]604 E//a 3PJ→3H6 13 105 72 InGaN-LD 2015[ 21 ]638 E//a 3PJ→3F2 16 128 188 InGaN-LD 2015[ 21 ]700 E//a 3PJ→3F4 18 78 47 InGaN-LD 2015[ 21 ]724 E//b 3PJ→3F4 20 117 48 InGaN-LD 2015[ 21 ]CaF2 642 - 3PJ→3F2 7.5 22 305 InGaN-LD 2017[ 51 ]LaF3 537 π 3PJ→3H5 16 15 159 InGaN-LD 2012[ 24 ]612 π 3PJ→3H6 15 20 98 InGaN-LD 2012[ 24 ]635 c 3PJ→3F2 16 23 95 InGaN-LD 2012[ 24 ]720 π 3PJ→3F4 37 80 10 InGaN-LD 2012[ 24 ]ASL 620 π 3PJ→3H6 11 50 ~510 2w-OPSL 2018[ 52 ]2018[ 52 ]2018[ 52 ]643 π 3PJ→3F2 27 160 ~200 2w-OPSL 725 π 3PJ→3F4 37 318 ~280 2w-OPSL LMA 620 σ 3PJ→3H6 2 2.9 ~100 2w-OPSL 2012[ 27 ]648 σ 3PJ→3F2 4 10.1 ~90 2w-OPSL 2012[ 27 ]729 σ 3PJ→3F4 12 63.7 ~25 2w-OPSL 2012[ 27 ]YAP 547 E//c 3PJ→3H5 6.1 37 320 InGaN-LD 2013[ 53 ]662 E//c 3PJ→3F2 9 27.4 680 GaN-LD 2011[ 54 ]747 E//b 3PJ→3F4 45 490 300 2×InGaN-LD 2014[ 55 ]SRA 525 - 3PJ→3H5 - 36 ~1000 2w-OPSL 2013[ 56 ]623 σ 3PJ→3H6 11 114 ~200 4×InGaN-LD 2014[ 15 ]644 - 3PJ→3F2 37 1065 ~500 2w-OPSL 2013[ 56 ]724 σ 3PJ→3F4 50 564 15.5 4×InGaN-LD 2014[ 15 ]
Table 3. Spectroscopic parameters of Dy3+ doped YAP and other crystals
View tableView in ArticleTable 3. Spectroscopic parameters of Dy3+ doped YAP and other crystals
Hosts σabs/(×10-21, cm2) β/% σem/(×10-20, cm2) τf/μs Ref. YAG 1.6 50.96 1.50 376 [64] YAl(BO3)4 - 65.90 1.90 520 [65] LiLuF4 - 65.40 1.02 582 [66] Lu2SiO4 - 61.0 0.74 509 [67] KY3F10 - 59.8 0.83 440 [66] Li2Gd4(MoO4)7 σ: 2.5 π: 4.4 σ:72.0 π: 71.9 σ: 1.45 π: 1.34 139 [68] YAP a:0.743 b:0.690 c:0.870 a:88.5 b:88.7 c:87.8 a:0.298 b:0.450 c:0.452 185 This work
Table 4. Laser output of Dy3+ doped some common laser crystal
View tableView in ArticleTable 4. Laser output of Dy3+ doped some common laser crystal
Crystals λem/nm Polarizations Laser transitions ηslope/% Pout/mW Pthr/mW Type Year Dy,Tb : LLF 574 σ 4F9/2→6H13/2 13 55 320 CW 2014[ 72 ]Dy,Eu : YLF 574 σ 4F9/2→6H13/2 10 47 244 CW 2016[ 17 ]2016[ 17 ]2016[ 17 ]Dy : LLF 578 σ 4F9/2→6H13/2 4 17 188 Self-pulsed 661 π 4F9/2→6H11/2 2 4 143 Self-pulsed Dy : YAG 583 - 4F9/2→6H13/2 12 150 - Self-pulsed 2012[ 64 ]Dy : ZnWO4 575 E//b 4F9/2→6H13/2 13 110 550 CW 2017[ 71 ]
Table 5. Spectroscopic parameters of Tb3+ doped YAP and other crystals
View tableView in ArticleTable 5. Spectroscopic parameters of Tb3+ doped YAP and other crystals
Host labs/nm σabs/(×10-22, cm2) lem/nm σem/(×10-22, cm2) τf/ms Ref. LLF 488.8 3.0 585 ~11 4.8 [76] TPP 485 1.3 587 1.0 3.4 [75] TLP 487 2.2 588 1.0 3.7 [75] TAB 483 3.6 592 1.0 0.8 [75] PZABP - - 582 0.7 0.42 [77] LBTAF - - 585 0.58 1.27 [78] YAP E//a 486 3.3 590 1.72 1.72 This work E//b 484 5.2 591 2.73 E//c 484 4.1 588 2.65
Table 6. Laser output of Tb3+ doped some common laser crystal
View tableView in ArticleTable 6. Laser output of Tb3+ doped some common laser crystal
Crystals λem/nm Polarizations Laser transitions ηslope/% Pout/mW Pthr/mW Pump source Year Tb : YLF 542 σ 5D4→7F5 55 158 8 2w-OPSL 2016[ 81 ]587 π 5D4→7F4 22 71 32 2w-OPSL Tb : LLF 542 σ 5D4→7F5 52 1130 32 2w-OPSL 587 π 5D4→7F4 14 82 107 2w-OPSL Tb : KYF 545 σ 5D4→7F5 34 793 25 2w-OPSL 584 π 5D4→7F4 5 18 38 2w-OPSL Tb : BLuF 546 σ 5D4→7F5 46 270 18 2w-OPSL Tb : CaF2 541 - 5D4→7F5 48 103 ~34 2w-OPSL 2017[ 82 ]
Table 7. Spectroscopic parameters of Sm3+ doped YAP and other crystals
View tableView in ArticleTable 7. Spectroscopic parameters of Sm3+ doped YAP and other crystals
Sample labs/nm σabs/(×10-20, cm2) FWHMabs /nm lem/nm σem/(×10-21, cm2) FWHMem/nm τf/ms Ref. Sm : SrAl12O19 400(σ) 8.5(σ) - 593(σ) 1.2(σ) - 3.4 [88] Sm : LiLuF4 401(σ) 1.04(σ) 2.3(σ) 606(π) 1.3(π) 7.5(σ) 4.8 [87-88] 401(π) 1.51(π) 3.1(π) 9.5(π) Sm : LiYF4 401(σ) 0.72(σ) 3(σ) 597(σ) 0.679(σ) 7.5(σ) 4.8 [86] 401(π) 1.37(π) 2(π) 605(π) 1.039(π) 9.5(π) Sm : YAP 409(E//a) 0.25(E//a) 8.4(E//a) 604(E//a) 0.47(E//a) 6.29(E//a) 0.59 This work 409(E//b) 0.67(E//b) 10.2(E//b) 604(E//b) 1.01(E//b) 6.32(E//b) 409(E//c) 0.86(E//c) 9.4(E//c) 610(E//c) 0.96(E//c) 3.26(E//c)
Tools
Get Citation
Copy Citation Text
Na LI, Bin LIU, Jiao-Jiao SHI, Yan-Yan XUE, Heng-Yu ZHAO, Zhang-Li SHI, Wen-Tao HOU, Xiao-Dong XU, Jun Xu.
Paper Information
Category: REVIEW
Received: Sep. 3, 2018
Accepted: --
Published Online: Sep. 24, 2021
The Author Email: Xiao-Dong XU (xdxu79@jsnu.edu.cn), Jun Xu (xujun@mail.shcnc.ac.cn)
© Copyright 2018-2021 | Chinese Laser Press.
All Rights Reserved 沪ICP备15018463号-20